French Open Stars Slam Prize Money Gap Despite Record Revenue

Leading tennis stars including Jannik Sinner, Aryna Sabalenka, and Coco Gauff have voiced strong disappointment over French Open prize money distribution, despite a 10% increase to €61.7 million. Players argue their revenue share has dropped to 14.3%, far below the 22% they requested, while tournament revenue is expected to exceed €400 million. The statement highlights a growing gap between player earnings and tournament revenues, along with unresolved issues on player welfare and governance. Novak Djokovic was notably absent from the latest communication, though the group remains united in demanding fair financial distribution and representation.

Key Points: French Open 2026: Players Protest Prize Money Share

  • Top players criticize French Open prize money distribution
  • Total prize pool raised to €61.7 million, but player share drops to 14.3%
  • Tournament revenue expected to exceed €400 million in 2026
  • Players demand 22% revenue share to match ATP and WTA tours
  • Concerns raised over lack of player consultation and welfare investment
3 min read

French Open 2026: Top tennis stars unhappy with prize money distribution

Jannik Sinner, Aryna Sabalenka, Coco Gauff criticize French Open prize money, saying player share drops to 14.3% despite record €400m revenue.

"Prize money as a percentage of revenue will likely still be less than 15%, far short of the 22% that players have requested. - Players' statement"

New Delhi, May 4

Leading tennis stars, including Jannik Sinner, Aryna Sabalenka, and Coco Gauff, have expressed serious concerns about how prize money is distributed at the French Open. They voiced their deep disappointment amid an ongoing dispute with the Grand Slam organisers.

This criticism comes even after the organisers announced a 10% increase in prize money, raising the total amount for Roland Garros 2026 to 61.7 million euros ($72.1 million). However, the players argue that this increase does not represent their contribution to the sport's rising revenues. They stated, "Roland Garros generated €395m in revenue in 2025, a 14% year-on-year increase, yet prize money rose by only 5.4%, reducing players' share of revenue to 14.3%," they said in a statement.

"With estimated revenues of more than €400m for this year's tournament, prize money as a percentage of revenue will likely still be less than 15%, far short of the 22% that players have requested to bring the grand slams into line with the ATP and WTA tours. As Roland Garros looks to post record revenues, players are therefore receiving a declining share of the value they help create.

"More critically, the announcement does nothing to address the structural issues that players have consistently and reasonably raised over the past year. There has been no engagement on player welfare and no progress towards establishing a formal mechanism for player consultation within grand-slam decision-making.

"The grand slams remain resistant to change. The absence of player consultation and the continued lack of investment in player welfare reflect a system that does not adequately represent the interests of those who are central to the sport's success."

The tournament, which starts on May 24 in Paris, will give 2.8 million euros to the singles champions and 1.4 million euros to the runners-up. Semifinalists will earn 750,000 euros, while first-round losers will receive 87,000 euros. Doubles champions will take home 600,000 euros, and mixed doubles winners will earn 122,000 euros.

Despite these amounts, the players emphasised that "the underlying figures tell a very different story." They pointed to a growing gap between tournament revenues and player earnings.

They also warned that with expected revenues surpassing 400 million euros ($468,426,000) this year, "prize money as a percentage of revenue will likely remain below 15%, which is far short of the 22% that players have requested to align the Grand Slams with the ATP and WTA Combined 1000 events."

The statement also raised broader concerns beyond prize money, touching on governance and player welfare. The group said they are united in their desire for meaningful progress regarding fair financial distribution and the governance of the sport. They noted the lack of response to proposals about pensions, long-term health, and representation, stating that no progress has been made on "fair and transparent player representation within Grand Slam decision-making."

This statement was issued on behalf of the original group of signatories who had contacted Grand Slam organisers last year, although Novak Djokovic was not among those who signed this latest communication.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Priya S
While I understand the players' frustration, I feel the organizers have a point too. They increased prize money by 10% this year, which is not nothing. Also, the French Open spends a lot on infrastructure and fan experience. But yes, if revenues are growing so much, players should get more. Maybe a compromise at 18-19% would be fair to both sides.
R
Rohit P
It's not just about prize money, but also about player welfare and representation. The statement mentioned pensions and health concerns. These are serious issues for players who spend their entire careers building this sport. The Grand Slams need to listen, not just throw money. 🎾
N
Nikhil C
The disparity is stark—first-round losers get €87,000 while champions get €2.8 million. That's a huge gap. Lower-ranked players struggle to make ends meet. If the French Open really cares about the sport, they should distribute prize money more evenly across rounds, not just at the top. This is a structural issue that needs fixing.
M
Michael C
From a US perspective, I'm shocked that the French Open is resisting change while making record profits. The players are right to demand 22% like the tours. But I disagree with some comments—the top stars already earn millions from endorsements. It's the lower-ranked players who need this money the most. Focus on them!
V
Vikram M
One thing I notice—Novak Djokovic didn't sign this latest statement. Shows that even among players, there are different views. But overall,

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50