Former CJI BR Gavai Highlights Independent Bar's Role in Protecting Constitutional Democracy in Sri Lanka

Former Chief Justice of India BR Gavai emphasized the critical role of an independent Bar in protecting constitutional democracy and citizens' rights during an address to the Bar Association of Sri Lanka. He highlighted that the Bar and Bench are complementary institutions that together uphold accountability in a democracy. Justice Gavai referenced India's freedom movement and landmark constitutional developments, including the Kesavananda Bharati case and the Emergency period, to illustrate the Bar's historical significance. He concluded that constitutional democracies require an independent, vigilant, and engaged Bar to address modern challenges like digital governance and transnational crime.

Key Points: BR Gavai: Independent Bar Key to Constitutional Democracy

  • Independent Bar is a constitutional necessity
  • Bar and Bench uphold accountability
  • Lawyers have shaped societies beyond courtrooms
  • Basic structure doctrine evolved from Kesavananda Bharati case
  • Emergency period saw Bar defend judicial independence
3 min read

Former CJI BR Gavai says Independent Bar essential to protect constitutional democracy in Sri Lanka address

Former CJI BR Gavai says independent Bar is vital for democracy, citing India's freedom movement, Kesavananda Bharati case, and Emergency period in Sri Lanka address.

"Silence is convenient - Justice BR Gavai"

New Delhi, May 10

Former Chief Justice of India BR Gavai has said that an independent Bar plays a vital role in protecting constitutional democracy and citizens' rights, stressing that lawyers must have the courage to defend institutional integrity "when silence is convenient."

Addressing the Bar Association of Sri Lanka on the topic "Role of the Independent Bar in protecting the constitution and the citizens," Justice Gavai said the Bar and the Bench are complementary institutions and together uphold accountability in a democracy.

He observed that the independence of the Bar is not merely a professional privilege but a constitutional necessity, as it ensures citizens get fearless legal representation and enables the state to be held accountable through constitutional challenges.

Praising the history of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, the former Chief Justice said the institution has earned public trust by consistently standing for justice, constitutionalism and citizens' rights. He noted that the Association had shown the courage to take principled stands during difficult constitutional moments in Sri Lanka.

Justice Gavai said that throughout history, lawyers have shaped societies beyond courtrooms. Referring to India's freedom movement, he highlighted the contributions of lawyer-leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, B. R. Ambedkar, Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel in shaping constitutional and social change.

The former CJI also referred to landmark constitutional developments in India, including the Supreme Court's judgment in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, where arguments by noted jurist Nani Palkhivala led to the evolution of the basic structure doctrine limiting Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.

Recalling the Emergency period, Justice Gavai mentioned the dissent by Justice HR Khanna in the ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla case and said Bar Associations across the country had defended judicial independence by protesting against his supersession.

He further noted that lawyers in India have expanded access to justice through public interest litigation. Referring to cases brought by MC Mehta and DK Basu, Justice Gavai said lawyers have actively shaped constitutional rights relating to environmental protection and safeguards against custodial abuse.

The former Chief Justice also referred to the Supreme Court's 2024 judgment on the demolition of properties of accused persons, where the Court held that the executive cannot act as "prosecutor, judge and executioner" simultaneously. He said punitive action without due process is incompatible with constitutional governance.

Concluding his address, Justice Gavai said constitutional democracies across the world require an "independent, vigilant and engaged Bar," particularly at a time when legal systems are facing challenges arising from digital governance, migration, environmental degradation and transnational crime.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I appreciate the reference to Justice HR Khanna's dissent during the Emergency. That was a dark time for India, and lawyers who spoke up were heroic. But let's be honest - today, some lawyers are more interested in TV debates than defending constitutional values. We need more substance, less drama in the legal profession.
V
Vikram M
I'm a bit skeptical about these grand speeches abroad. While Justice Gavai makes valid points about constitutional democracy, what about the reality in India? We see politicians targeting judges, and the independence of the judiciary is under pressure. Talk is cheap - we need action from the Bar and Bench here at home. 🇮🇳
A
Ananya R
I feel proud when Indian leaders speak on global platforms about the rule of law. The Kesavananda Bharati case and the basic structure doctrine are our gifts to constitutional jurisprudence. But we must also remember that true independence means lawyers defending all citizens equally, not just the powerful. Hope Sri Lanka learns from both our successes and failures.
R
Rohit P
Justice Gavai's speech is excellent, but I wonder how many of us in India even know about these constitutional principles. The common citizen is more worried about rising prices and unemployment than about the "basic structure doctrine". The Bar needs to connect with people's everyday struggles, not just elite legal debates. 🤔
S
Siddharth J
The point about the 2024 Supreme Court judgment on property demolitions is crucial. It's becoming too common for executive authorities to bulldoze homes without due process - that's the antithesis of constitutional governance. An independent Bar must take up such cases and protect the vulnerable, not just argue high-profile corporate matters. Well said

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50