NewKerala.com

Iran Demands Firm Guarantees to End War, President Tells EU Council Chief

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated Iran's readiness to conclude hostilities, contingent on receiving firm guarantees against future aggression. He made these remarks in a phone call with European Council President Antonio Costa, criticizing the EU for failing to denounce the military actions. Pezeshkian argued that Iran was compelled to target US installations in neighboring countries due to their failure to prevent attacks from their territory. In response, Costa assured that the EU did not support the aggression and emphasized the urgent need for de-escalation.

Key Points: Iran Seeks Guarantees to End Hostilities, President Tells EU

  • Iran ready to end hostilities with conditions
  • Requires firm guarantees against future strikes
  • Criticizes EU for not condemning aggression
  • EU stresses need for de-escalation
2 min read

"Firm guarantees" required to end war: Iranian President tells European Council President in phone call

Iranian President outlines ceasefire conditions, demanding firm guarantees against future aggression in call with European Council President Antonio Costa.

"necessary resolve to end this war if the required conditions are met - President Masoud Pezeshkian"

Tehran, April 1

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has expressed Tehran's readiness to conclude the current hostilities against what he termed "US-Israeli aggression," provided the Islamic Republic receives "firm guarantees" against future domestic strikes, according to state broadcaster Press TV.

During a telephonic discussion on Tuesday with European Council President Antonio Costa, Pezeshkian maintained that the primary resolution for "normalising the situation" necessitated an immediate cessation of attacks by the opposing forces.

He emphasised that Iran has "never sought tension or war at any stage," but remains committed to defending its sovereignty.

Outlining the requirements for a ceasefire, the Iranian leader stated that the nation possesses the "necessary resolve to end this war if the required conditions are met," specifically highlighting the need for "necessary guarantees to prevent a recurrence of aggression."

Addressing the regional dynamics of the conflict, Pezeshkian noted that while Iran respects its neighbours' sovereignty, it felt compelled to target US military installations within those borders.

According to Press TV, he argued that these "nations have not fulfilled their international responsibility to prevent the use of their territory for attacks against Iran."

The President further directed criticism towards the European Union for failing to denounce the ongoing military actions.

He characterised the offensive as a "flagrant violation of the rule of law" and a direct "assault on all the principles and rules" traditionally upheld by the EU.

Urging a shift in European diplomacy, Pezeshkian suggested that "instead of adopting a destructive approach against Iran," the bloc should align its "policies and stances based on international law."

Press TV reported his call for a move towards "constructive and professional interaction" rather than continued confrontation.

In response, Antonio Costa reportedly assured that EU member states "never supported the aggression against Iran," viewing such actions as a breach of "international laws and regulations."

He stressed the urgency of de-escalating regional tensions to mitigate further "negative political and economic repercussions."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The EU's role is crucial here. Costa saying they "never supported the aggression" is a good step, but actions speak louder. The world doesn't need another prolonged conflict. The economic repercussions for global trade, including India, could be severe. Let's hope for de-escalation. 🙏
R
Rohit P
Interesting to see Iran positioning itself as seeking peace after being the aggressor. The statement about targeting US bases in neighboring countries because they "failed their international responsibility" is a dangerous precedent. What about the sovereignty of those nations? The narrative feels one-sided.
S
Sarah B
As an Indian, our primary concern is the stability of the region and the safety of our diaspora there, plus energy security. This back-and-forth between major powers always puts smaller nations in a difficult spot. India should continue its balanced diplomatic approach.
V
Vikram M
The phrase "necessary resolve to end this war" is key. It shows a door is open for negotiation. In our Indian tradition, we believe in *sama, dama, danda, bheda* (conciliation, gifts, punishment, division). Right now, conciliation is what the world needs. The EU must act as an honest broker.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, I think President Pezeshkian's criticism of the EU is misplaced. The EU has its own challenges and cannot be expected to solve every conflict. Every party involved needs to take responsibility for de-escalation. Finger-pointing won't bring peace.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50