FIFA World Cup 2026: Ticketing fraud surges amid rise of fake websites
New Delhi, June 25
Fraud patterns seen at previous major tournaments are already emerging around the FIFA World Cup 2026, exposing fans and ticket sellers to heightened risks, a report said on Thursday.
The report from ACI Worldwide found that fraudulent orders averaged $405 during the pre‑tournament build, about 1.5 times the $270 legitimate average and average transaction values rose 1.2 per cent.
The firm suggested that average fraudulent transaction values could again approach $400 during the 2026 World Cup.
An analysis of 24.5 million transactions across 61 live‑event merchants serving global fan audiences, showed that warning signs that preceded fraud surges during Copa America 2024 and the 2022 World Cup have re‑emerged in this tournament.
Fraudsters are majorly targeting higher‑value purchase, the report said, adding that fraud pressure is expected to remain high through the opening stages of the tournament across the United States, Canada and Mexico.
Silent Push -- a US-based threat intelligence firm that tracks online fraud networks -- has identified more than 300 pixel‑perfect replica ticketing websites.
Check Point Research -- the research arm of cybersecurity company Check Point Software -- recorded 9,741 fraudulent World Cup‑related domains registered in April 2026 alone, nearly four times the peak seen around the 2022 tournament.
Cybersecurity firms and law enforcement have warned that fraudsters are using automation and artificial intelligence to scale World Cup‑related scams.
Fortinet counted more than 13,000 tournament‑themed domains registered between January and May 2026.
Alternative payment methods (APMs) are significantly safer and they only recorded a 0.57 per cent attempted fraud rate, compared with 3.97 per cent for traditional cards, a sevenfold difference.
APM adoption has climbed from 7 per cent of transactions in 2022 to 24.8 per cent year-to-date in 2026.
During the pre‑tournament build, domestic cards recorded a 3.2 per cent attempted fraud rate, compared with 1.4 per cent for cross-border cards, reflecting fraudsters' preference for locally issued credentials.
— IANS
Reader Comments
Living in Mumbai, I've seen how common credit card fraud is even in local concerts. So this global scale of fraud for FIFA doesn't surprise me at all. The 7x difference between APM fraud rate and traditional cards is eye-opening though. UPIs and wallets are really the way forward. India's UPI system is the best example of secure digital payments. Wish the world would adopt it faster! 🇮🇳
I'm a football fan from Delhi and it's frustrating that we have to worry about scams just to enjoy the beautiful game. The report says fraudsters prefer locally issued cards. Well, that explains why my friend in Bangalore got duped with a fake ticket site last month. The authorities in US, Canada, and Mexico need to do more. Also, why is it so hard to make APMs standard everywhere? Digital India has shown the way.
The fact that fraudulent transaction values are higher ($405 vs $270 legitimate) shows that fraudsters are targeting people who can actually afford expensive tickets. That's just wrong on so many levels. And 13,000 fake domains registered between January and May? Unbelievable. India needs to educate more people about this. My advice: always buy from official FIFA website, use credit card with fraud protection, and avoid 'too good to be true' deals on third-party sites. Be careful, everyone! ⚽
Honestly, this is shameful. Football is supposed to bring people together, not be a playground for cybercriminals. The official organizers should have anticipated this. 9,741 fraudulent domains in just one month? That's almost 325 per day! Someone isn't doing their job properly. On the brighter side, it's great that APM adoption has increased from 7% to 24.8%. But 75% of transactions are still card-based. We need more awareness and better regulation specifically for event ticketing. Don't let fraudsters ruin the World Cup spirit! 🤬🤬
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.