Middle East Conflict Threatens 15% Drop in India's Fertiliser Production

Supply chain disruptions from the Middle East conflict could reduce India's annual domestic fertiliser production by 10-15%, according to a Crisil Ratings report. The crisis threatens imports of key raw materials like LNG and ammonia, for which India depends heavily on the region. This would lower capacity utilisation, dent manufacturer profitability, and potentially increase the government's subsidy burden by Rs 20,000-25,000 crore. While strong industry liquidity and past government support provide a cushion, prolonged issues could impact the crucial kharif farming season.

Key Points: Middle East Crisis May Cut India's Fertiliser Output by 15%

  • 10-15% production dip likely
  • Subsidy bill may rise Rs 20,000-25,000 crore
  • Key raw material imports at risk
  • Profitability to decline for manufacturers
  • Government support crucial to mitigate impact
4 min read

Fertiliser production to dip 10-15% if Middle East issues persist: Crisil Ratings

Crisil Ratings warns supply chain disruptions could slash domestic urea and complex fertiliser production by 10-15%, raising subsidy bills by Rs 25,000 crore.

"The ongoing issues in the Middle East could disrupt the fertiliser supply chain at a crucial time for the kharif season. - Anand Kulkarni, Crisil Ratings"

New Delhi, March 26

Supply chain disruptions stemming from the ongoing conflict in the Middle East can potentially impact annual domestic production of both complex fertilisers and urea by 10-15 per cent, according to a report by Crisil Ratings.

Profitability of manufacturers could decline amid lower capacity utilisation due to supply constraints of key raw materials.

The report further noted that the increase in prices of raw materials and imported fertilisers is likely to increase the working capital requirement of players and also raise the subsidy bill of government by Rs 20,000-25,000 crore.

Nevertheless, two factors will support credit profiles - firstly, the strong liquidity of large fertiliser companies and secondly, the government's track record of supporting the sector over time with adequate and timely subsidy disbursements, the report stated.

Urea accounts for 45 per cent of fertiliser consumption in India, complex fertilisers (diammonium phosphate, or DAP, and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, or NPK) for one-third, and single super phosphate (SSP) and muriate of potash (MOP) for the rest.

Fertiliser sector's dependence on imports remains high, with ~20 per cent of urea and one-third of complex fertilisers, primarily DAP, being imported. Furthermore, the key raw materials for urea (natural gas, which comprises ~80 per cent of the raw material cost) and complex fertilisers (ammonia and phosphoric acid) are largely imported due to limited domestic reserves.

For both urea and DAP imports, the Middle East remains an important region, accounting for ~40 per cent of imports in the first nine months of fiscal 2026 (42 per cent in fiscal 2025 and 28 per cent in fiscal 2024). For domestic fertiliser production, the dependence on the Middle East is even higher, with ~60-65 per cent of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and 75-80 per cent of ammonia imports coming from the region.

Anand Kulkarni, Director, Crisil Ratings, says, "The ongoing issues in the Middle East could disrupt the fertiliser supply chain at a crucial time for the kharif season. Disruption in LNG and ammonia supplies continuing for about three months could cut domestic urea and complex fertiliser production by 10-15%. The impact on production will be cushioned to some extent by the recent government directive for the allocation of 70% gas to urea manufacturers. Additionally, the fertiliser inventory of around three months, along with expected imports from alternative sources, will mitigate the risk of immediate supply shortages."

The reduced capacity utilisation is likely to dent profitability, with urea manufacturers likely to see a larger impact as suboptimal capacity utilisation will reduce energy efficiency.

Profitability of urea players primarily hinges on the difference between prescribed energy norms and actual energy consumption, as natural gas costs are completely passed through. Energy consumption of efficient players is ~5 per cent lower than the prescribed norms, which directly boosts their profitability. However, with a decline in capacity utilisation, energy efficiency will take a hit, leading to an impact on operating profits. Nonetheless, players with multiple plants may optimise gas usage between plants to lower the impact.

Similarly, the profitability of complex fertilisers may get impacted due to the interplay of variables such as rising input costs, transmission of costs to the Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) rates set by the government, and retail prices.

The shortage of raw materials and increased supply chain costs have already increased prices of ammonia by ~24 per cent since the start of the conflict. With limited ability to pass on these costs, the extent of impact on profitability will depend on commensurate hikes in NBS rates.

The industry will require additional subsidy support from the government to mitigate the impact. Given the strategic importance of the sector, the government has supported it in the past through increased NBS rates and additional subsidy for DAP players.

The ability of fertiliser makers to source key raw materials and fertilisers from alternative sources and government intervention in this regard will bear watching in case the Middle East conflict prolongs, the report concluded.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Our over-dependence on imports, especially from a volatile region, is a long-standing strategic weakness. Time to seriously invest in domestic production and research for sustainable alternatives. Atmanirbhar Bharat should start with our food security.
R
Rohit P
My father is a farmer in Punjab. News like this makes us very anxious. Fertilizer prices are already high. If production dips and subsidy gets delayed, it will be a disaster for the sowing season. Hope the government's 3-month inventory buffer is real and reaches the ground.
S
Sarah B
While the report highlights government support, it's a reactive measure. We need proactive, long-term policies to de-risk this sector. The environmental cost of fertilizer overuse is another issue, but that's a separate debate. For now, securing supply is critical.
V
Vikram M
The 70% gas allocation directive for urea plants is a good short-term step. But the core issue remains - we import 80% of the raw material cost for urea! How is this sustainable? We need to fast-track exploration of domestic natural gas reserves dedicated to the fertilizer sector.
K
Karthik V
A respectful criticism: The article and the report focus on large manufacturers' credit profiles. That's important, but the real story is the small retailer and the farmer. Will the distribution system ensure fair prices and availability in remote areas? That's where the crisis often hits hardest.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50