Supreme Court Notes Smooth SIR Voter Roll Exercise, Except in West Bengal

The Supreme Court has verbally observed that the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of voter rolls proceeded relatively smoothly across states, with West Bengal being the notable exception. The remarks came during a hearing on pleas alleging procedural irregularities in the SIR process within West Bengal. The court indicated it would consider a request to extend the date for freezing the electoral rolls in the state to allow for adjudication of excluded voters. This follows earlier Supreme Court interventions, including the deputation of judicial officers to assist with the revision in West Bengal.

Key Points: Supreme Court on SIR Voter Roll Exercise: Smooth Except Bengal

  • SC remarks on smooth SIR exercise
  • Litigation primarily from West Bengal
  • Court to consider extending roll freeze date
  • Earlier orders deployed judges for revision
3 min read

Except Bengal, SIR exercise went smoothly in every state: Supreme Court

Supreme Court observes Special Intensive Revision of voter rolls went smoothly in all states except West Bengal, where procedural irregularities prompted litigation.

"Except West Bengal, whichever states where SIR is done, everywhere it went smoothly. - Chief Justice Surya Kant"

New Delhi, March 24

The Supreme Court has verbally remarked that the Election Commission of India decision to undertake Special Intensive Revision exercise of voter rolls has undergone relatively smoothly in States, apart from West Bengal.

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant remarked that there was hardly any litigation (court dispute) in terms of SIR exercise in other states.

"Except West Bengal, whichever states where SIR is done, everywhere it went smoothly. Even in other States there are complications, if not equally, but there are complications. But by and large hardly any litigation came from other States", the CJI said.

The remarks came as the Court was hearing a batch of pleas flagging various procedural irregularities in the ECIs SIR in West Bengal. Considering the peculiarity of the situation, the apex court had earlier issued

During the hearing, Senior Advocate and AITC leader Maneka Guruswamy requested the Court to consider extending the date of freezing of electoral rolls in West Bengal election (so that names of persons objecting to their exclusion from the list can be adjudicated and added).

The Court in response clarified that it will definitely consider it. "We will consider if so required. Right now things are going well", the Court said.

Earlier on February 27, the Supreme Court refused to entertain a request by the Government of West Bengal seeking to restrain the Election Commission of India (ECI) from allegedly issuing directions to judicial officers engaged in verification of documents under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the State.

The issue was mentioned by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal before a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.

Sibal contended that despite the Court's earlier order, the Commission had issued a training module to judicial officers which, according to him, amounted to directions on how certain documents were to be treated. He argued that the Commission could not instruct judicial officers in this manner and maintained that the officers were capable of independently discharging their functions.

Meanwhile, on February 21, the apex court had ordered the deputation of district judges to resolve pending voter claims of people categorised in the Commission's "logical discrepancy" list. These directions had come from the Court in an extraordinary move to remove impediments in the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal.

Subsequently, after receiving a communication from the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court, which flagged the lack of abundant manpower, despite having assigned around 250.

Judicial officers' role in the SIR exercise, the apex court had permitted the Calcutta HC Chief Justice to additionally deploy civil judges from West Bengal and even judicial officers from the States of Orissa and Jharkhand.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an observer, it's concerning that a basic administrative exercise requires Supreme Court intervention and the deputation of judges from other states. This seems like an extraordinary situation. Hope the process is completed transparently so voters have faith in the system.
P
Priyanka N
While I support a clean voter list, the process must be respectful of federal structure. The state government's concerns about the EC issuing directions to judicial officers are valid. Judges should be independent. The SC's balanced approach of deploying more officers is a good middle path.
A
Aman W
This is getting messy. First logical discrepancies, now training modules for judges? The whole point of SIR is to correct the rolls, not create more legal battles. Just let the officers do their work properly and finalize the list. Jai Hind!
K
Kavitha C
The CJI's remark that "things are going well" now is reassuring. The apex court stepping in to depute judges from Odisha and Jharkhand shows commitment to solving the logjam. Ultimately, every legitimate voter's name should be on the list. That's democracy. 👍
D
David E
Interesting to see the judiciary playing such an active role in election preparation. In many democracies, the electoral commission operates with full autonomy. The fact that the SC had to get involved highlights unique challenges in the Indian context.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50