Sat, 13 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 12, 2026 · 14:16
World News Updated Jun 12, 2026

EU Divided Over Revoking Pakistan's GSP+ Status Amid Rights Crisis

Pakistan has failed to meet human rights conditions attached to its EU GSP+ trade status, which has doubled its exports since 2014. Despite persistent rights violations, the European Commission has upheld Pakistan's status, citing expected reforms. The European Parliament has called for reassessment since 2021, revealing a divide within the EU over strategic versus conditional priorities. Critics argue the EU's reluctance to revoke GSP+ reflects a preference for security cooperation over enforcing human rights standards.

EU divided over revoking GSP+ status to Pakistan amid human rights violations

New Delhi, June 12

Pakistan was granted access to the EU's Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus on January 1, 2014, and the country was able to double its exports to the EU, with around 66 per cent exempt from European import duties.

However, Islamabad has failed to meet the essential condition on human rights progress that it was expected to fulfil in return for enjoying this huge economic benefit, according to an article published by 9DASHLINE.com platform.

Despite persistent human rights violations, the EU has yet to revoke or temporarily suspend Pakistan's GSP+ status, the article by Eve Register points out.

Although the European Parliament has been calling for a reassessment of Pakistan's GSP+ status since 2021, European Commission representatives concluded that they were satisfied with Pakistan's progress. This highlights a divide within the EU over whether Pakistan's strategic importance takes precedence over maintaining the integrity of the GSP+ framework, the article observes.

It points out that in theory, the European Commission's upholding of Pakistan's status is driven by the expectation that Islamabad adheres to human rights reform, alongside the belief that economic prosperity from increased trade fosters greater social progress.

In reality, however, the EU considers Pakistan a strategic partner embedded within a turbulent region, whose cooperation could help the EU manage a range of security threats, particularly in counter-terrorism and counter-narcotics trafficking.

This strategy has led to the selective enforcement of GSP+ conditions in Pakistan's case, which threatens to undermine the purpose of the scheme and the deals made with other GSP+ beneficiaries, the article observes.

It further highlights that while Pakistan has ratified several reforms and established new entities to improve human rights, it is the implementation of reform that is central to the GSP+ deal. Most reports, however, indicate that human rights conditions have deteriorated rather than improved in the country since obtaining GSP+ status.

"The EU's reluctance to apply further pressure by leveraging Pakistan's GSP+ status suggests an ulterior motive - preserving its security partnership with Islamabad," the article added.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Sarah B

As an outsider looking in, I find this very troubling. The EU's GSP+ was meant to incentivize human rights reforms, but here they're prioritizing security over principles. Makes you wonder if the scheme is just a political tool now.

Priya S

Well, well, well... so Pakistan promised reforms and delivered nothing, but EU is still satisfied? Chalo, at least now the world can see the truth. India has been saying this for years - Pakistan's human rights record is a sham. But security concerns always win over morality, no? 🤔

Michael C

Not defending Pakistan, but isn't India also a beneficiary of similar trade preferences? Maybe we should look at our own backyards before pointing fingers. The article does raise valid points about selective enforcement though - that's a fair criticism.

Vikram M

The EU should revoke this immediately. Pakistan has been using GSP+ benefits to boost its economy while persecuting minorities - especially Hindus and Christians. Meanwhile, India is denied similar preferential treatment despite our better record. Biased? Yes, very much! 🇮🇳

Jessica F

This is a classic case of realpolitik trumping values. EU needs Pakistan's help on Afghanistan and counter-terrorism, so human rights take a backseat. It's disappointing but not surprising. The scheme needs major reforms or it's just a farce.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked