Bharti Seeks Fair AGR Treatment, Mittal Cites Tata Precedent at Davos

Rajan Bharti Mittal of Bharti Enterprises has written to the government seeking equitable treatment regarding the company's AGR dues, which amount to nearly Rs 38,000-40,000 crores. He cited that other companies like Tata have gone through a similar process and is awaiting a government response. Speaking at Davos, Mittal noted that while geopolitics is uncertain, India's story remains intact as a bright spot with strong interest in manufacturing and new-age businesses. Meanwhile, Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia clarified that the relief granted to Vodafone Idea was a special case based on a Supreme Court judgment and does not automatically extend to others.

Key Points: Bharti's Mittal Seeks Equitable AGR Treatment from Government

  • Bharti awaits govt response on AGR dues
  • Seeks equitable treatment citing Tata precedent
  • Mittal highlights India as a bright spot at Davos
  • Minister Scindia says Vodafone relief was a special case
3 min read

"Equitable treatment should be given to us like others": Rajan Bharti Mittal, Vice Chairman of Bharti Enterprises

Rajan Bharti Mittal says Bharti Enterprises awaits government response on AGR dues, seeking fair treatment like others, while highlighting India's bright spot status at Davos.

"We are hoping that equitable treatment should be given to us. - Rajan Bharti Mittal"

Davos, January 22

Rajan Bharti Mittal, Vice Chairman and Managing Director of Bharti Enterprises, on Thursday, while speaking regarding AGR, said, "we have written to the government, and equitable treatment should be given to us."

Speaking with ANI on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum, Mittal on the AGR dues said, "We have written to the concerned department of the government, and waiting for their responses. We are hoping that equitable treatment should be given to us. Even other companies like Tata's who have gone through this."

"We have nearly Rs 38,000 to 40,000 crores AGR dues that we have to pay over a period of time," he said.

On the question on any response from the government, he said, "Not as of now."

Speaking about his takeaways at the WEF, Mittal said, "The takeaway from Davos is that in my view, geopolitics is uncertain. That has weighed a lot on the minds of the European leaders, and on corporate leaders. The other is India's story is intact, people's interest, corporate interest in India is very much alive. In fact, India remains the bright spot."

"The interest in manufacturing, the increase in the manufacturing side, as is quite clearly being seen, indicates that the manufacturing companies want to establish a base in India. The new age businesses, the renewables, the EVs, there is a huge interest in that sense," he said.

In a separate development, amid reports that other large telecom operators are seeking equitable treatment on AGR liabilities following the government's decision to grant Vodafone Idea a 10-year moratorium, Union Minister of Communications Jyotiraditya M. Scindia on Wednesday clarified that the relief was granted strictly on the basis of a Supreme Court judgment and does not automatically extend to other players.

Responding to a question by ANI on whether the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has received any official communication from other telcos seeking similar relief, Scindia said the government's decision was rooted in the apex court's recognition of Vodafone Idea as a special case.

"The decision that the Government of India has taken is based on the judgment that was pronounced by the Supreme Court where it has seen Vodafone as a special case, both because it has 20 crore customers, as well as the fact that the government owns 49% of its equity. Based on that decision of the Supreme Court, the government has taken it taken a view in terms of a policy what needs to be done with regard to the AGR dues and the spectrum views remain the same," the minister had said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The AGR issue has been dragging on for years. While I understand the need for fair treatment, the government owning 49% of Vi does make it a unique case. Airtel is a strong company; perhaps they should focus on their business strategy rather than seeking relief. India's telecom story is indeed bright! 🇮🇳
P
Priya S
As a customer, I just want good service and affordable plans. All these corporate dues and government policies are confusing. But if one company gets relief, others will naturally ask for it. That's basic business sense. Hope it gets resolved without affecting our tariffs.
R
Rohit P
Mittal sir is right to ask for equitable treatment. But the minister's clarification is also important - the Supreme Court's judgment was specific. You can't have different rules for different players in the long run. This needs a holistic policy review, not case-by-case fixes.
K
Karthik V
The positive takeaway is that India remains a bright spot for manufacturing and investment! That's the real story from Davos. While telcos sort out their dues, the focus should be on building that renewable and EV infrastructure. Let's not get bogged down by one sector's issues.
N
Nisha Z
With all respect to Mr. Mittal, I have to disagree. If the government bails out every big corporate with huge dues, what message does it send? They took business risks, they should manage the consequences. The taxpayer shouldn't always be the backup. The special case for Vi is understandable given the government stake.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50