EEPC Chairman slams US tariff move as 'bargaining tactic'
Mumbai, June 3
Pankaj Chadha, Chairman of the Engineering Export Promotion Council, on Wednesday sharply criticised the United States Trade Representative report on India, calling Washington's latest tariff offensive a deliberate negotiating ploy timed to pressure New Delhi ahead of ongoing Bilateral Trade Agreement talks.
Responding to the USTR report, Chadha expressed confidence that it would not withstand legal scrutiny.
"The Supreme Court has already declared it illegal. It will go to the Court of Appeal and then back to the Supreme Court, where it will be declared illegal again," he said, dismissing the report as legally untenable.
Chadha questioned the very premise of the proposed trade deal under current conditions. "So far, the US has no tariff against India other than Section 232. Then why would we sign a Bilateral Trade Agreement at 18 per cent, with conditions that demand duty-free access for their poultry feed, nuts, pistachios, and apples, while they slap an 18 per cent duty on my exports?" he asked pointedly. "You cannot expect me to give them duty-free access and accept 18 per cent on what I sell them."
He noted that the fresh pressure under Section 301 invoked just as the US negotiating team arrived in India for BTA discussions was no coincidence. "This is a bargaining tactic, nothing more than that," Chadha said bluntly.
Responding to forced labour allegations raised in the USTR report, Chadha was categorical in his denial. "We reject this completely. There is absolutely no question of forced labour in India," he stated.
On Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal's recent remarks that India and the US would soon sign the first tranche of the BTA, Chadha urged caution. "The US has fired a shot of 12.5 percent and now they want that to be the basis of BTA discussions. You cannot negotiate by pointing a gun at my head. This is not a fair way to hold negotiations," he said, adding that he would watch developments closely while negotiations remain in the hands of the Commerce Minister and his team.
Broadening his concern to the UK trade front, Chadha revealed that India's recently concluded Free Trade Agreement with Britain remains unoperationalised over a steel dispute.
"The government has heard our concern that you cannot sign an FTA and then impose a 50 per cent duty on Indian steel. That should have been resolved during FTA negotiations. Imposing new duties after signing is simply not fair," he said. "The UK FTA will not be operationalised until this is sorted out."
— ANI
Reader Comments
Interesting perspective from the Indian side. I think the US is using the same tactics they use with China. But India is not China - we have our own strengths. The forced labour allegations are baseless, and the timing of this report is clearly a negotiation tactic. Let's see how the BTA talks progress.
I appreciate Mr. Chadha's bluntness. "You cannot negotiate by pointing a gun at my head" - absolutely right! 😤 The US wants duty-free access for their apples and pistachios while taxing our steel and engineering goods. That's not a partnership. India should walk away if the terms are one-sided.
While I support the strong stance, I hope our negotiators are being practical. Trade wars hurt both sides. India exports $8 billion worth of engineering goods to the US annually - we can't afford to lose that market. But yes, we shouldn't sign a bad deal either. The UK FTA issue with steel duties is also concerning. Hope the government resolves both wisely.
As an American, I can see why India is upset. The 18% tariff on Indian goods while demanding free access for US agricultural products does seem unfair. But I also think the USTR report has some valid concerns about market access. Both sides need to come to the table with realistic expectations. This 'my way or highway' approach won't work.
Chadha sahab is spot on! The US thinks they can bully everyone. But India has woken up now - no more signing one-sided deals like in the 90s. Also, the UK FTA issue shows
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.