ECI Adopts Stricter Repoll Norms for West Bengal Elections Amid Intimidation Fears

The Election Commission of India will adopt a stricter and more proactive approach to ordering repolls in the upcoming West Bengal Assembly elections. Officials indicate re-polling will be ordered more urgently based on complaints of voter intimidation or obstruction, moving beyond the previous "exceptional cases" standard. The decision leverages provisions under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, for cancelling votes and ordering repolls in cases of booth capturing or preventing voters. Voters facing threats can lodge complaints remotely, and police are empowered to make arrests without a warrant in such situations.

Key Points: ECI Stricter Repoll Rules for West Bengal Assembly Elections

  • Stricter repoll norms for voter intimidation
  • Action based on complaints & field reports
  • Repolls under RP Act sections 58A & 135A
  • Police can arrest without warrant
2 min read

ECI to adopt stricter norms for repoll in West Bengal Assembly elections

Election Commission to order repolls more swiftly in cases of voter intimidation or obstruction during the West Bengal Assembly elections.

"Now they will be ordered on an urgent basis, depending on reports of voter intimidation - ECI Official"

Kolkata, March 28

The Election Commission of India is set to adopt a stricter approach to ordering repolls in the upcoming West Bengal Assembly elections, with officials indicating that re-polling may now be ordered more promptly in cases of voter intimidation or obstruction of voting.

An official familiar with the development said that until now, repolls were conducted only in "exceptional" cases, but the Commission is now inclined to act more swiftly based on complaints and field reports.

"Earlier, repolls were held in exceptional cases. Now they will be ordered on an urgent basis, depending on reports of voter intimidation and any attempt to vitiate the electoral process," an official said.

It may be noted that the Representation of the People Act, 1951, provides provisions for re-polling in specific circumstances. The law allows repolls to be conducted at particular booths or polling stations, with the final decision resting with the Commission based on ground reports.

In previous elections, political parties had frequently alleged intimidation, booth capturing, and obstruction of voting at several polling stations across the state. However, repolls were not ordered in a large number of such cases, as decisions were largely based on reports submitted by presiding officers.

This time, the Commission is expected to take more immediate and proactive decisions. Officials indicated that strict action could be initiated if there is any serious breakdown of law and order during polling.

According to the Commission, in cases of booth capturing under Section 58A of the Representation of the People Act, votes in the affected booths will be cancelled and repolls ordered.

Similarly, if voters are prevented from casting their votes, polling in the concerned booths will be cancelled. Under Section 135A of the Act, repolls may also be ordered in cases involving forcible capture of booths, obstruction of voting, or blocking access to polling stations.

Officials added that voters who are unable to reach polling stations due to threats can lodge complaints with the Commission or designated observers, even remotely. In such cases, appropriate action, including ordering repolls, may be taken.

The Commission also stated that the police are empowered to make arrests without a warrant in cases involving threats, unrest, or obstruction of voters.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Finally! The 'exceptional case' clause was being misused. Booth capturing and voter intimidation should never be tolerated. The power to arrest without a warrant is crucial. Let's hope for peaceful and fair elections this time.
R
Rohit P
Good move, but the real test is execution. Will the presiding officers and local police have the courage to file honest reports against powerful local goons? The ECI must protect its own officers on duty.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, I appreciate the clarity. The provision for remote complaints is smart in today's digital age. A voter threatened at home can still report. This could be a game-changer for ensuring voter safety.
V
Vikram M
While the intent is good, I'm cautiously optimistic. Past elections show a gap between policy and reality. The ECI needs to ensure central forces are deployed adequately and are proactive, not just reactive.
K
Kavya N
Democracy is about the power of the vote. Any step that protects that power is a step in the right direction. Bengal needs this. Hope all political parties will respect this stricter stance and advise their workers accordingly.
M
Michael C
A respectful criticism: The article mentions past inaction based on presiding officers' reports. What training or safeguards are new this time

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50