Pakistan Rejects Doctrine, Then Adopts It Against Afghanistan: Report

Pakistan rejected India's doctrine established during Operation Sindoor, which stated state support for terror cannot hide behind plausible deniability. However, Pakistan now uses the same rationale for its own cross-border strikes against Afghanistan, accusing the Taliban of sponsoring terror. The report in The National Interest highlights that Pakistan's evidence against Afghanistan is weaker than India's case in May 2025. Pakistan's actions, including airstrikes on Nangarhar and Paktika, are legally questionable as the International Court of Justice maintains mere tolerance of armed groups does not justify self-defence.

Key Points: Pakistan Rejects Doctrine, Then Adopts It Against Afghanistan

  • Pakistan rejected India's Operation Sindoor doctrine as illegitimate
  • Pakistan now uses same doctrine for cross-border strikes on Afghanistan
  • India's doctrine states future terror attacks from Pakistan treated as acts of war
  • Pakistan failed to provide credible evidence for its claims against Afghanistan
3 min read

Doctrine rejected by Pakistan during Op Sindoor now shapes its policy against Afghanistan: Report

A report reveals Pakistan rejected India's Operation Sindoor doctrine against terror but now uses it to justify cross-border strikes on Afghanistan.

"The doctrine Pakistan denounced when invoked against itself has become the doctrine it now invokes against Kabul. - The National Interest"

Washington, May 15

Pakistan's accusations of militant sanctuaries and assertions of a right to conduct cross-border strikes against Kabul are being made on weaker evidentiary grounds compared to India's case in May 2025 during Operation Sindoor which was launched by the Indian military following the heinous Pahalgam terror attack carried out by a Pakistan-based terror group, a report has stated.

"A little over one year ago, India set down a doctrine that Pakistan denounced as illegitimate. Operation Sindoor, launched on the night of May 7, 2025, established that state support for terror could no longer hide behind plausible deniability. The operation followed a terrorist attack that killed 26 Indians in Pahalgam on April 22," a report in American magazine 'The National Interest' detailed.

"Pakistani officials rejected the argument wholesale, arguing that India had no right to act on accusations it could not prove. The following February, the Pakistan Air Force applied that same rationale against the Taliban government of Afghanistan, which it accused of sponsoring terror attacks in Pakistan. The doctrine Pakistan denounced when invoked against itself has become the doctrine it now invokes against Kabul," it added.

The report noted that the lasting significance of Operation Sindoor lay in its impact on the cost calculus of cross-border terrorism. India targeted nine sites in Pakistan linked to terror groups Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), including the LeT headquarters at Muridke and the JeM complex in Bahawalpur.

According to a report, the political doctrine articulated after the fighting paused on May 10 was unequivocal: future terror attacks originating from Pakistani soil would be treated as acts of war, with India determining its own response.

For three decades, it said, plausible deniability had served as the guiding principle of the Pakistani state's engagement with terror networks.

The report highlighted that Pakistani airstrikes on Nangarhar and Paktika on February 21 and 22 targeted Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) camps in Afghanistan, with Pakistani Defence Minister Khawaja Asif declaring "open war" on Afghanistan on February 27. It added Pakistan's Operation Ghazab lil Haq - military offensive against Afghanistan -- involved sustained air and artillery strikes across eastern Afghan provinces. Pakistani forces also targeted an Afghan university in the Asadabad region in Afghanistan in late April.

Citing the UN Special Rapporteur's report in March 2026, it noted that Pakistan could not provide credible evidence that TTP attacks inside its territory were directed or controlled by Afghan authorities. The International Court of Justice has long maintained that the "mere tolerance of armed groups by one state does not confer on a neighbouring state the right of self-defence."

"This is the legal architecture Islamabad dismissed when applied to Sindoor." It is now the architecture under which Pakistan operates," it noted.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Fascinating how geopolitical hypocrisy works. Pakistan called India's doctrine illegitimate, but now they're adopting it wholesale against the Taliban. The real question is: will the international community hold Pakistan to the same standard it applied to India? Somehow I doubt it. Double standards have been the norm for too long.
V
Vikram M
The irony is staggering. Pakistan has been using terrorist proxies for decades as a tool of state policy, hiding behind plausible deniability. Now that the same strategy is being used against them, they're crying foul. Maybe this will teach them that terrorism is a boomerang - it always comes back. India was right then, and history is proving us right now.
J
James A
As an outsider looking in, this is a classic case of "rules for thee but not for me." The National Interest report lays bare the inconsistency in Pakistan's position. They rejected India's right to self-defence after the Pahalgam attack, but now claim the same right against Afghanistan. International law doesn't work on convenience. Either it applies to everyone or it doesn't apply at all.
N
Neha E
While I appreciate that India's stance is being vindicated, we must remember: no two situations are identical. Pakistan's claims against Afghanistan may have some merit, just as India's claims against Pakistan had merit. The problem is the hypocrisy - if Pakistan truly believes in the doctrine of cross-border strikes, they should acknowledge that India was justified in 2025. Consistency matters in international relations.
R
Raghav A
The National Interest article is spot on. Pakistan's entire foreign policy has been built on the foundation of

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50