Delhi HC Shields Spiritual Leader from AI Deepfake Misuse of Identity

The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction protecting spiritual leader Dr. Aniruddha Dhairyadhar Joshi from the misuse of his identity through AI-generated deepfakes. The court found that fabricated videos and images were being used to falsely show him endorsing products and delivering sermons, causing irreparable harm to his reputation. It ordered social media platforms like Google, Meta, and X to remove the infringing content within 48 hours of a complaint. The court emphasized that such unauthorized use infringes upon protected personality and publicity rights.

Key Points: Delhi HC Bans AI Deepfakes of Spiritual Leader

  • Ex-parte injunction granted
  • AI deepfakes used for false endorsements
  • Platforms ordered to take down content
  • Personality rights infringement cited
2 min read

Delhi High Court grants interim relief to spiritual leader against AI deepfake misuse of persona

Delhi High Court grants injunction protecting spiritual leader Dr. Aniruddha Joshi from AI-generated deepfake videos and images circulated on social media.

"failure to grant immediate relief would cause irreparable harm - Delhi High Court Order"

New Delhi, April 2

The Delhi High Court has granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of a well-known spiritual leader, restraining the misuse of his identity through AI-generated deepfake content across social media platforms.

The order was passed by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela in a suit filed by Dr. Aniruddha Dhairyadhar Joshi, who is widely revered by followers as "Aniruddha Bapu."

The Court noted that the plaintiff has made out a strong prima facie case, observing that his personality, reputation, and goodwill built over decades of spiritual teachings were being unlawfully exploited through fabricated videos, images, and voice-cloned content. It held that failure to grant immediate relief would cause irreparable harm that cannot be compensated monetarily.

According to the plea, unknown individuals (John Does) used advanced AI tools to create deepfake videos and images falsely depicting the spiritual leader delivering sermons, endorsing products, and interacting with followers. These videos were widely circulated on platforms like YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X, garnering significant public engagement and misleading viewers into believing them to be authentic.

The Court recognised that such content not only misleads the public but also dilutes the credibility and trust associated with the plaintiff. It further observed that the unauthorised use of a person's name, voice, image, and mannerisms amounts to infringement of personality and publicity rights, which are protected under the law.

In its directions, the High Court restrained the defendants from using or exploiting the plaintiff's identity, including his name, voice, likeness, and distinctive style, through any medium, including AI-generated or deepfake content. It also directed major platforms such as Google, Meta, and X to take down the identified infringing content within 48 hours of receiving a complaint and to disclose details of the accounts responsible for uploading such material.

Additionally, the Court ordered the unidentified defendants to cease all such activities and provide details of the fabricated content created using the plaintiff's persona. It emphasised that the misuse of emerging technologies like AI for impersonation and commercial gain cannot be permitted.

The matter will next be heard after completion of pleadings, with further proceedings scheduled later this year.

Notably, the plaintiff in the present case is a prominent spiritual figure, similar in public influence to personalities like Aniruddhacharya Maharaj, a popular Katha orator and founder of Gauri Gopal Ashram in Vrindavan, known for his large following and strong digital presence.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Finally, the law is catching up with technology. These deepfakes are a menace. Imagine your grandparents watching a fake video of their trusted guru endorsing some shady product. The 48-hour takedown order for platforms is crucial. Hope they comply properly.
A
Aman W
While I agree deepfakes are bad, I hope this doesn't set a precedent where any criticism or parody of public figures gets blocked. The line between misuse and satire needs to be clear. The court must ensure the remedy isn't worse than the problem.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in tech, the order to disclose account details is the key. These "John Does" operate in shadows. Unless platforms are forced to reveal who paid for ads or uploaded content, such misuse will continue. A strong step for digital rights in India.
K
Karthik V
Good move by the Delhi HC. Spiritual leaders have a massive influence in our society. Misusing their image can cause real-world harm and social unrest. The judgment rightly focuses on the "irreparable harm" to reputation built over decades. Jay Ho!
N
Nikhil C
The real challenge is enforcement. How will they track down all the anonymous accounts across multiple platforms? The order is good on paper, but I'm skeptical about its ground-level implementation. We need a dedicated cyber cell for such crimes.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50