Delhi HC Seeks Centre's Help in UK Court's Nirav Modi Evidence Request

The Delhi High Court has asked the Central government for assistance regarding a judicial request from the UK concerning the Nirav Modi-Bank of India case. The UK court seeks to record the testimony of a Delhi-based Bank of India official as a witness in foreign proceedings. Justice C. Hari Shankar noted the unusual nature of a direct request from a foreign court without any litigant's application. The court has issued notices and scheduled the next hearing for January 2026.

Key Points: Delhi HC on UK Judicial Request in Nirav Modi-Bank of India Case

  • UK court seeks testimony from Indian bank official
  • Request made under Hague Convention
  • Nirav Modi impleaded for procedural convenience
  • Notice to be served via Indian Consulate in UK
2 min read

Delhi HC seeks Centre's assistance on UK judicial request in Nirav Modi-Bank of India case

Delhi High Court seeks Centre's assistance for UK court's request to record testimony in the Nirav Modi-Bank of India loan default dispute.

"this situation was unusual - Justice C. Hari Shankar"

New Delhi, January 19

The Delhi High Court has requested the assistance of the Central government regarding a communication from the Supreme Court of England and Wales in the Nirav Modi-Bank of India matter.

The UK court has asked for judicial assistance to record the testimony of a Delhi-based Bank of India official, who is a witness in proceedings abroad concerning Firestar Diamond FZE and Nirav Deepak Modi in a loan default dispute.

Justice C. Hari Shankar observed that this situation was unusual, as there appeared to be no prior instance where an Indian court acted solely on a direct request from a foreign court without any party to the foreign litigation approaching it.

The request was transmitted through the Union Ministry of Law and Justice under the 1970 Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters.

To facilitate the process, the High Court impleaded the parties to the UK proceedings, including Nirav Modi, clarifying that this was done solely for procedural convenience and not because the case was pending before the Indian court.

Notices were issued to the Central government and other concerned parties, with instructions to place proof of service on record. Since Nirav Modi is currently lodged at HMP Thameside prison in London, the Court directed that notice be served upon him through the Consulate General of India in the United Kingdom, with the Additional Solicitor General tasked with ensuring proper service.

The matter was recently listed, and during subsequent hearings, the Court recalled a similar request made in 2016 by the Government of Portugal in the case of Visesh Infotecnics Ltd. vs Banco EFISA, SA Participadas, SGPS, S.A. The Court also asked counsel for the Bank of India to clarify whether the bank intends to file a formal application in the matter. The case has now been scheduled for further hearing on January 21, 2026.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The process seems very complex and lengthy. 2026 for the next hearing? 😳 Justice delayed is justice denied. While procedure is important, I hope the courts can find a way to expedite matters, especially when public money is involved.
R
Rahul R
It's interesting that the judge said this is unusual. Shows our legal system is still navigating these international waters. The Hague Convention is there for a reason - we should use it fully to bring back our money. Jai Hind!
A
Ashley H
As someone following this from abroad, it's reassuring to see judicial systems working together. The UK court reaching out directly shows the seriousness of the case. Hope the witness testimony helps secure a conviction.
K
Karthik V
With all due respect to the courts, I'm more concerned about why our banks' systems were so weak in the first place. We need stronger internal audits and accountability to prevent another Nirav Modi from happening. The focus should be on prevention too.
M
Meera T
Good to see the process moving, even if slowly. Every step counts. I just hope the common taxpayers who ultimately bore the brunt of this scam see some closure and recovery of funds. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50