Delhi High Court to Protect Aman Gupta's Personality Rights in Landmark Case

The Delhi High Court has indicated it will pass an interim order to protect businessman Aman Gupta's personality rights. Senior Advocate Diya Kapur argued that Gupta's name, image, and trademark are being misused for fake endorsements, merchandise, and AI chatbots. Google's counsel noted challenges in removing memes and harmless content, but the court signaled interim relief. The court recognized personality rights as part of the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Key Points: Delhi HC to Pass Order in Aman Gupta's Personality Rights Case

  • Delhi HC to pass interim order for Aman Gupta's personality rights
  • Court hears submissions on unauthorized use of name, image, and trademark
  • Google raises concerns about removing memes and harmless content
  • Court signals interim relief while clarifying not all posts require removal
2 min read

Delhi HC says it will pass order in businessman Aman Gupta's personality rights case

Delhi High Court indicates interim order to protect businessman Aman Gupta's personality rights from unauthorized use in fake endorsements and AI content.

"We will pass an order. - Justice Tushar Rao Gedela"

New Delhi, May 7

The Delhi High Court on Thursday indicated that it would pass an interim order protecting the personality rights of Businessman Aman Gupta, co-founder of boAt Lifestyle and judge on Shark Tank India.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed, "We will pass an order," after hearing submissions in the matter.

Senior Advocate Diya Kapur, appearing for Gupta, told the Court that his name, image and trademark were being used without permission across fake endorsements, merchandise sales, event booking platforms, AI chatbots and objectionable online content.

Counsel appearing for Google submitted that while certain infringing content could be removed, taking down memes and harmless content may not always be feasible. The Court, however, clarified that not every post would require removal while signalling interim relief in Gupta's favour.

The Delhi High Court has, in a series of judgments, recognised personality rights as part of the right to privacy and dignity protected under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The Court has repeatedly held that a person's name, voice, image, likeness and mannerisms cannot be commercially exploited without consent, particularly in cases involving AI-generated deepfakes, fake endorsements, misleading websites and unauthorised merchandise.

Over the years, the High Court has granted protection to several public personalities, including Anil Kapoor, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Abhishek Bachchan, Raj Shamani, Amitabh Bachchan, Allu Arjun, Mohanlal, Jubin Nautiyal, Pawan Kalyan, Sunil Gavaskar, Kajol, R. Madhavan, N. T. Rama Rao Jr., Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and Karan Johar.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
I support protecting individuals from misuse, but I hope the court strikes a balance. Memes and harmless fan content shouldn't be caught in the crossfire. The Google submission about not taking down everything is valid.
V
Vikram M
It's good to see the judiciary recognizing that a person's image and identity have commercial value. In today's digital age, where anyone can create fake content, this protection is essential. Aman Gupta is right to seek this.
P
Priya S
I appreciate the court's proactive approach! With so many fake endorsements and AI-generated content, it's high time we had clear laws. Though I wonder how this will be enforced practically across all online platforms.
R
Rohit P
A good move, but I hope this doesn't lead to unnecessary litigation against small creators or ordinary citizens sharing opinions. The line between infringement and fair use needs to be clearly defined. Bhai, we need balanced laws.
K
Kavya N
This is fantastic! As a fan of Shark Tank India, I've seen how easily celebrities' identities get misused. The fact that even AI chatbots were mimicking him is scary. Privacy and dignity are fundamental rights indeed. 😊
M
Michael C
Interesting how Indian courts are evolving on digital rights. The Article 21 angle is clever. But I'm curious

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50