Delhi HC to Hear Patanjali Co-founder's Plea Against Deepfake Misuse

The Delhi High Court is set to hear a commercial suit filed by Patanjali Ayurved co-founder Acharya Balkrishna. He seeks protection of his personality rights and action against the alleged misuse of his identity through deepfake technology. The suit targets unknown parties involved in creating or circulating manipulated digital content. This case reflects growing judicial attention to the risks of AI-generated media for public figures.

Key Points: Delhi HC Hears Acharya Balkrishna's Deepfake, Personality Rights Case

  • Personality rights protection suit
  • Deepfake technology misuse
  • Filed against unknown parties
  • Judicial scrutiny of AI manipulation
  • Concerns for public figures
2 min read

Delhi HC to hear Acharya Balkrishna's plea on personality rights, deepfake misuse

Delhi High Court hears Patanjali co-founder Acharya Balkrishna's suit seeking protection from deepfake misuse and unauthorized use of his identity.

"The suit seeks protection of personality rights, which cover an individual's name, image, voice, and likeness from unauthorised use. - Content"

New Delhi, March 22

The Delhi High Court is scheduled to hear a commercial suit on Monday filed by Patanjali Ayurved co-founder and Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna seeking protection of his personality rights and action against alleged misuse of his identity through deepfake technology.

The matter is listed before Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.

The suit has been filed against Ashok Kumar (fictitious name) and other unknown parties for allegedly being involved in creating or circulating manipulated digital content.

Acharya Balkrishna is an Indian businessman, author, and co-founder and Managing Director of Patanjali Ayurved. He holds a significant stake in the company and is a close associate of yoga guru Ramdev. Balkrishna was also listed among India's 50 most influential personalities in 2020.

The suit seeks protection of personality rights, which cover an individual's name, image, voice, and likeness from unauthorised use. It also raises concerns about deepfake content, AI-generated or manipulated media that can falsely portray a person in fabricated scenarios.

The inclusion of "John Doe" defendants indicates that the plaintiff is also seeking action against unknown persons who may be responsible for creating or disseminating such content.

Senior advocate Arvind Nayyar, along with Yagyawalkya Singh, Dr Divya Swamy, and Anubhav Agrawal, may appear for Acharya Balkrishna.

The case reflects increasing judicial scrutiny of deepfake technology and its potential misuse, particularly in relation to public figures. Courts are increasingly being approached to address concerns around digital manipulation, privacy, and reputation.

The High Court is expected to examine whether immediate directions are required to prevent the circulation of the alleged content and safeguard Balkrishna's rights.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While protecting personality rights is crucial, I hope the focus remains on the technology misuse and not just on a public figure's case. Laws need to be updated for the AI age to protect everyone, not just the influential.
V
Vikram M
Good move by Acharya ji. These deepfakes can ruin reputations built over decades. We've seen fake videos of politicians, now business and spiritual leaders are targets. The judiciary must act swiftly.
R
Rohit P
Interesting to see "John Doe" being used in an Indian court case. Tracking down anonymous online offenders is the biggest challenge. Hope the court's directions help in creating a framework for social media platforms to cooperate.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in tech, this case highlights a global problem. India's legal response will be watched closely. The balance between innovation, free speech, and protection from harm is very delicate.
A
Aditya G
Patanjali has faced controversies, but this issue is separate and critical. No one should have their digital likeness stolen and misused. This is about basic dignity and the right to one's own identity.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50