Thu, 30 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 28, 2026 · 11:50
Education News Updated Jul 28, 2026

Delhi HC Gets AICTE's Plan to Curb Fake Technical Institutes

The All India Council for Technical Education has informed the Delhi High Court of its robust mechanism to identify and penalise unapproved technical institutions. AICTE regularly publishes lists of approved and unapproved institutions and issues public advisories before admission sessions. The affidavit was filed in response to a PIL by advocate Shashank Deo Sudhi, with the court terming the issue a serious concern. AICTE stated that institutions offering unapproved programmes face penal action, including closure and inclusion in the unapproved list.

Delhi HC fake Universities PIL: AICTE says it has robust mechanism to identify, penalise unapproved technical institutions

New Delhi, July 28

The All India Council for Technical Education has informed the Delhi High Court that it has put in place a comprehensive statutory and regulatory framework to prevent the mushrooming of fake and unauthorised technical institutions across the country.

In a counter affidavit filed before the Court, AICTE said it regularly publishes lists of approved and unapproved institutions, issues public advisories before admission sessions and initiates penal action against institutions operating without approval.

The affidavit has been filed in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Shashank Deo Sudhi and has been sworn by AICTE Director Dr Neetu Bhagat. AICTE submitted that it is a statutory body constituted under the AICTE Act, 1987, to ensure planned and coordinated development of technical education and maintain academic standards throughout the country.

It stated that the AICTE Act empowers the Council to regulate technical education and frame regulations governing the approval of institutions and technical programmes.

According to AICTE, it has framed detailed Approval Process Regulations and an Approval Process Handbook prescribing the procedure and minimum requirements for establishing new technical institutions, introducing new courses and increasing intake in existing institutions. It added that these regulations form the basis of its oversight over technical education institutions.

The Council told the Court that it maintains and periodically updates on its official website lists of approved and unapproved institutions so that students, parents and the public can verify the approval status of colleges before seeking admission. It also issues public notices, particularly before admission and counselling sessions, advising stakeholders to check the approval status of institutions and programmes and cross-check the list of unapproved institutions.

AICTE further submitted that it has established a comprehensive regulatory framework under the AICTE Act, the Approval Process Handbook and other applicable regulations, and takes action whenever institutions are found conducting technical programmes without obtaining the Council's approval.

The affidavit states that institutions offering technical programmes without prior AICTE approval are liable for penal action under the Approval Process Handbook. Such institutions are declared unapproved, punitive proceedings are initiated against them, and their names are included in the list of unapproved institutions maintained by the Council.

AICTE also stated that institutions functioning from temporary or unapproved locations may face closure and other regulatory action, while the concerned State Governments or Union Territories may be asked to initiate appropriate civil or criminal proceedings against the defaulting institutions or their management.

It further submitted that institutions are not permitted to obtain approval for only some of their programmes. Any institution offering programmes falling within AICTE's jurisdiction must obtain approval for all such programmes, failing which it is liable to face strict penal action under the applicable regulations. AICTE has also sought liberty to file a more detailed counter affidavit, if directed by the Court.

The counter affidavit has been filed pursuant to directions issued by the Delhi High Court recently, while hearing the PIL filed by advocate Shashank Deo Sudhi seeking action against fake universities and unrecognised higher educational institutions operating across the country.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia had termed the issue a serious concern, observing that many students, particularly from small towns, enrol in such institutions only to find later that their degrees have little or no value in securing employment.

The Bench had directed the Union Government, the University Grants Commission (UGC) and AICTE to file affidavits detailing the measures taken to curb the spread of fake institutions.

The Court had also asked Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma to convey the concerns raised in the PIL to the Ministry of Education and ensure that appropriate action is taken. It further directed the Delhi Government to place on record the steps taken by a committee constituted to investigate fake universities operating in the national capital.

During the hearing, ASG Chetan Sharma had informed the Court that the situation was alarming, with some fake universities even offering courses in vocational studies, law and medicine. The Court had observed that information regarding fake universities was already available in the public domain.

In his PIL, Sudhi has sought directions to stop the operation of fake universities and unrecognised institutions across Delhi and the rest of the country. He has also sought criminal action against institutions identified as fake universities and a CBI investigation into those responsible for establishing and operating them.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya S

It's a shame that students from rural areas get cheated so easily. The government should run awareness campaigns in villages and small towns. Parents spend their life savings on these fake degrees only to find their children cannot get jobs. AICTE must also work with local authorities to close such institutions immediately.

Michael C

As someone who works in tech recruitment, I can tell you that fake degrees are a real problem. We often have to verify credentials manually. AICTE's list of approved institutions should be easier to access - maybe a mobile app or WhatsApp bot so parents can check before paying fees. Good to see the court taking this seriously.

Vikram M

The problem is deeper than just AICTE. Many of these fake universities operate under state government acts or religious trusts, making it hard for central bodies to act. We need a coordinated effort between UGC, AICTE, state governments and local police. Also, the punishment should be severe - life imprisonment for those running these scams! 🚫

Ananya R

I'm glad the Delhi High Court is taking this seriously. My cousin almost got admitted to a fake college in Punjab last year - luckily we checked the AICTE website and found it wasn't approved. The court should mandate that all government websites prominently display warnings about fake institutions. Education is the foundation of our future, we cannot let it be destroyed by these criminals! 🙏

James A

While AICTE's framework sounds robust, one has to wonder why these fake institutions continue to thrive despite regulations. Perhaps fines are too low or enforcement too slow. A centralized database with real-time updates accessible to everyone could help. Also, social media platforms should be held accountable for ads promoting these

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked