NewKerala.com

Delhi HC Bans Parking, Commercial Use at Yamuna Flood Plains

The Delhi High Court has directed the DDA to ensure no parking or commercial activity occurs on the Yamuna flood plains at Sur Ghat, citing ecological sensitivity under Zone-O. Justice Jasmeet Singh restricted all commercial and religious activities in the area for environmental protection. The court rejected a plea by Suresh Kumar seeking restoration of a parking site, noting he did not challenge the cancellation order. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue civil remedies for compensation.

Key Points: Delhi HC Stops Parking, Commercial Activity at Yamuna Flood Plains

  • Court directs DDA to stop all commercial and parking activities at Yamuna flood plains
  • Site falls under ecologically sensitive Zone-O
  • Petitioner Suresh Kumar's plea for parking site restoration rejected
  • Court grants liberty to seek civil remedies for compensation
2 min read

Delhi HC directs DDA to ensure no parking or commercial activity on Yamuna flood plains

Delhi High Court directs DDA to halt parking and commercial use at Yamuna flood plains, citing ecological sensitivity under Zone-O. Court rejects plea for restoration of parking site.

"The area is ecologically sensitive and falls under Zone-O. - Justice Jasmeet Singh"

New Delhi, May 12

The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Development Authority to ensure that no activity, including parking of vehicles or any commercial use, is allowed on the Yamuna flood plains at Sur Ghat, observing that the area is ecologically sensitive and falls under Zone-O.

Justice Jasmeet Singh said that all kinds of commercial and religious activities must remain restricted in the area in the interest of environmental protection. The Court further directed that if parking arrangements are required for devotees visiting the river on auspicious occasions, the DDA must create alternative parking facilities away from the Yamuna flood plains without disturbing the sensitive ecological zone.

The directions came while disposing of a plea filed by Suresh Kumar seeking restoration of possession of a parking site at Yamuna Sur Ghat allotted under a Municipal Corporation of Delhi tender.

The petitioner stated that the MCD had issued a Notice Inviting Tender in September 2022 for various parking sites, including Yamuna Sur Ghat, and he was declared the highest bidder. He claimed that after depositing security and advance licence fee amounts, possession of the parking site was handed over to him, and operations began in January 2023.

However, during the proceedings, it emerged that the DDA had informed the MCD that only 2508 square metres of land had been transferred, whereas the MCD had allotted 3780 square metres to the petitioner. Subsequently, the DDA withdrew the permission, and the MCD cancelled the parking allotment in January 2025.

The Court noted submissions made on behalf of the DDA that the site falls within the Yamuna flood plains under Zone-O and cannot be used for commercial purposes. It also took note of DDA's stand that the area was urgently required to be vacated for development purposes.

Rejecting the plea for restoration of the parking site, the High Court observed that the petitioner had not challenged the cancellation order dated January 31, 2025, in the present proceedings. The Court further held that questions relating to the validity of the cancellation and any claim for compensation involved disputed questions of fact which could not be adjudicated in a writ petition.

The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate civil remedies, including filing a civil suit for damages, if advised.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The petitioner's case is sad too—he paid money in good faith, and now MCD is cancelling because DDA passed the buck. But the environmental angle is non-negotiable. Yamuna needs every inch of its floodplains for flood control and groundwater recharge. Compensate the man, but keep the plains green! 🌿
R
Rajesh Q
Yaar, ek taraf hum log pollution pe rote hain, aur doosri taraf commercial use ke liye river ki jameen bechte hain. This Court order is a good wake-up call. But the real test will be in ground implementation—DDA and MCD need to coordinate better instead of fighting in court!
A
Ananya R
I appreciate the environmental focus, but what about religious sentiments? Thousands visit Sur Ghat for chhath puja and other rituals. The Court should have directed a proper study of alternative sites before just banning everything. Balancing ecology and faith is tricky, but possible with planning.
J
James A
Interesting case of bureaucratic mismanagement. The MCD issued a tender for 3780 sq m when only 2508 sq m was legally transferred. How does that even happen? Both agencies need better accountability. Glad the Court upheld environmental protection despite the procedural mess.
K
Kavya N
Zone-O ka tag hona hi bahut kuch kehta hai. Yeh toh flood-prone area hai! We've seen what happens when rivers are encroached—floods get worse. Kudos to HC for prioritising ecology over commerce. Now if only we could clean the Yamuna itself... 😔

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50