SC Sets 4-Month Deadline for Centre, EPFO to Revise Stagnant PF Wage Ceiling

The Supreme Court has directed the Central government and the EPFO to decide within four months on revising the Employees' Provident Fund wage ceiling, which has been stuck at Rs 15,000 per month for 11 years. The order came on a PIL arguing the stagnant ceiling is arbitrary and excludes a large section of workers from social security coverage. The petition cited that expert bodies and parliamentary committees have long recommended periodic revisions to account for inflation and wage growth. The EPFO's own sub-committee had recommended an enhancement in 2022, but the Centre has yet to act on it.

Key Points: SC Deadline for EPFO Wage Ceiling Revision After 11 Years

  • SC sets 4-month deadline
  • Wage ceiling frozen at Rs 15,000 since 2014
  • PIL calls ceiling arbitrary, irrational
  • Exclusion from social security for many workers
2 min read

Decide within 4 months: SC to Centre, EPFO on plea seeking revision of wage ceiling under EPF scheme

Supreme Court directs Centre & EPFO to decide on revising the Rs 15,000 wage ceiling under the PF scheme within four months, unchanged since 2014.

"This erratic approach has resulted in exclusion of large sections of the workforce - PIL Petition"

New Delhi, Jan 5

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Central government and the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation to decide, within four months, on revising the wage ceiling under the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, which has remained unchanged for the past 11 years.

A Bench of Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Atul S. Chandurkar passed the directions while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) highlighting that the stagnant wage ceiling has resulted in a large section of workers being excluded from the ambit of the EPFO, a social welfare scheme intended to provide social security to employees in the organised sector.

Allowing the petitioner to make a fresh representation, the Justice Maheshwari-led Bench permitted the PIL litigant, Dr Naveen Prakash Nautiyal, to submit a detailed representation within two weeks along with a copy of the top court's order, and directed that it be decided within four months thereafter.

The petition, filed through advocates Pranav Sachdeva and Neha Rathi under Article 32 of the Constitution, contended that the existing wage ceiling of Rs 15,000 per month is "arbitrary and irrational" and has no linkage with inflation, minimum wages, or growth in per capita income, despite repeated recommendations by expert bodies and Parliamentary committees.

According to the plea, while the minimum wages notified by the Central government and various states have steadily increased over the years, the EPFO wage ceiling has remained frozen since September 2014, leading to the exclusion of employees earning marginally above Rs 15,000 per month from EPF coverage.

"This erratic approach has resulted in exclusion of large sections of the workforce, contrary to the object of providing social security to employees in the organised sector," the petition stated.

The PIL further highlighted that the Public Accounts Committee of the 16th Lok Sabha, in its 34th report, had observed that if even the lowest rung of workers is not covered by welfare schemes, "the very purpose of having social security schemes is defeated", and had recommended periodic revision of the wage ceiling every three to five years to offset erosion caused by inflation.

It was also highlighted that the EPFO's own Sub-Committee on Enhancing Coverage and Managing Related Litigation had, in 2022, recommended enhancement of the wage ceiling and enrolment of all employees as EPF members up to the revised ceiling. However, the recommendations were approved by the Central Board of Trustees (EPF) in July 2022 but are yet to be acted upon by the Centre.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is long overdue. My husband's salary is ₹16,500 and his company says he's not eligible for PF because of this outdated rule. It's so unfair. Our entire financial planning for old age is affected. Kudos to the petitioner for taking this up. 🙏
R
Rohit P
While I agree the ceiling needs revision, I hope the government does a proper study. A sudden, very high ceiling might burden small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with additional compliance costs. The balance is important.
S
Sarah B
Working in HR, I see this issue daily. The administrative headache of explaining to employees why they are ineligible despite earning a modest income is immense. The EPFO board approved it in 2022 itself! What is the delay for? The 4-month timeline is crucial.
V
Vikram M
The PIL rightly points out the link with inflation. ₹15,000 in 2014 is not the same as ₹15,000 in 2025. The government revises dearness allowance for employees regularly, so why neglect the EPF ceiling? This is a basic social security net.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, the Supreme Court should not have to step in for such basic administrative updates. It shows a lack of proactive governance. The expert committees give recommendations, the board approves, and then files gather dust. This needs to change.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50