Pakistan's Terror Nurturing Backfires, Making It World's Most Affected Nation

A new report cites a US Congressional Research Service finding that Pakistan harbors around 15 armed militant organizations, with 12 designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations by the US. It argues that decades of strategic tolerance for groups targeting India and Afghanistan have created a militant ecosystem that now violently threatens Pakistan itself. The report highlights the central paradox of Pakistan being both a victim and an enabler of terrorism, fueled by the same networks it once sought to control. It concludes that the Pakistani leadership must be pressed to dismantle this infrastructure and prioritize national security over outdated strategic doctrines.

Key Points: Report: Pakistan's Terror Policy Makes It Most Affected Nation

  • 15+ militant groups operate from Pakistan
  • 12 are US-designated terror organizations
  • Policy has backfired, killing thousands of Pakistanis
  • Ecosystem nurtured for decades
  • Report calls for leadership to prioritize public security
3 min read

Decades of nurturing terrorism leave Pakistan as 'most terror-affected' nation: Report

A new report details how decades of tolerating militant groups have made Pakistan the world's most terror-affected country, backfiring on its security.

"Pakistan is both a country battered by terrorism and one that has enabled the conditions for these terrorist groups to survive. - One World Outlook report"

Islamabad, March 30

Pakistan's civilian and military leadership should be pressed to confront the consequences of decades of strategic tolerance and nurturing towards terrorism operating from its soil -- an approach that has made the country the most terror-affected in the world, according to a new report.

The Pakistani people, who have borne the greatest cost of this policy in blood, deserve leadership that places their security above entrenched strategic doctrines.

"For decades, Pakistan's role as a haven for armed militant groups has been treated largely as South Asia's problem -- a festering wound in the India-Pakistan relationship, a complication in the Afghanistan files, and a talking point in diplomatic communiques that go nowhere. The assumption, implicit in how Western capitals have long approached the issue, is that whatever happens in the badlands of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa or the madrassas of Lahore is essentially a regional matter, best left to the region to sort out," a report in 'One World Outlook' stated.

Citing new findings from the US Congressional Research Service (CRS), released on March 25, the report said this clearly debunks comfortable fiction embraced by the West.

According to the report, the CRS, a nonpartisan research arm of the United States Congress, has identified around 15 armed militant organisations operating from Pakistani soil, with 12 designated as Foreign Terrorist Organisations under US law.

"They range from Al-Qaeda core -- founded in Pakistan in 1988 and still maintaining alliances with other groups there -- to the Islamic State-Khorasan Province, with an estimated 4,000 to 6,000 fighters operating across the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region. They include groups focused on destabilising India and Kashmir, dismantling the Pakistani state itself, targeting Iran's ethnic Baloch regions, and waging sectarian violence against Shia Muslims," it detailed.

"Taken together, they constitute not a single ideological project but an entire ecosystem of militant infrastructure -- one that has been nurtured, tolerated, or inadequately confronted for decades," it added.

Highlighting the central paradox of the CRS findings, the report said Pakistan is both a country battered by terrorism and one that has enabled the conditions for these terrorist groups to survive.

"The two facts are not unrelated. For years, Islamabad calculated that tolerating certain militant groups -- particularly those oriented toward India and Afghanistan -- served its strategic interests. It believed it could control the ecosystem. It cannot. The same networks, the same financing channels, and the same ideological infrastructure that sustain groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed also sustain the groups now killing Pakistani security forces and their families by the thousands," it noted.

The report further stressed that the question is not whether Pakistan has been affected by terrorism -- it clearly has -- but whether it is taking comprehensive steps to dismantle the infrastructure that enables it.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who has worked in international development, this is a heartbreaking but necessary read. The report highlights a critical failure of governance where short-term strategic gains were prioritized over long-term national security and citizen welfare. The focus must shift to the people suffering the most.
P
Priya S
The part about it being an "entire ecosystem" is so accurate. You can't just pick and choose which terror groups to support. It's like trying to control a wildfire. My heart goes out to the ordinary citizens there who just want peace. Hope the leadership finally wakes up.
V
Vikram M
While the report is spot on, I have to respectfully say it's a bit late. The West ignored this for years, calling it a "regional matter." Their funding and military aid indirectly sustained this for decades. Now the entire world is less safe. Everyone shares some blame.
A
Aman W
This is the hard truth. You cannot nurture snakes in your backyard and expect them to only bite your neighbors. The report mentions 15 groups! That's an industry of hate. Until the deep state's doctrine changes, nothing will improve. Jai Hind.
N
Nisha Z
So many lives lost on both sides of the border because of these policies. As an Indian, my first thought is for our soldiers and civilians lost to terror. But we must also hope for peace and stability for all in the region. A secure and prosperous neighborhood benefits everyone.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50