US Investors Threaten Arbitration Over "Discriminatory" South Korean Probe of Coupang

Two major US investment firms have formally notified the South Korean government of their intent to file arbitration claims, alleging discriminatory and hostile regulatory actions against e-commerce giant Coupang following a data breach. The investors, Greenoaks Capital and Altimeter Capital, also requested the US Trade Representative to launch an investigation into South Korea's conduct under Section 301 of the Trade Act. They argue that South Korean authorities have subjected Coupang to unprecedented scrutiny and penalties to benefit its domestic and Chinese competitors, causing billions in lost market capitalization. The dispute centers on a 2023 data leak affecting millions, which the investors characterize as limited, while accusing the government of making false claims to inflame public opinion.

Key Points: US Investors Notify South Korea of Coupang Arbitration Claims

  • US investors allege discriminatory probes
  • Threaten arbitration under trade pact
  • Request US Section 301 investigation
  • Cite Coupang's lost market value
3 min read

Coupang's US investors notify S. Korea of intent to file arbitration claims

US funds Greenoaks and Altimeter plan arbitration against South Korea, alleging discriminatory probes into Coupang after a data leak, seeking a US trade investigation.

"weaponising the administrative power of the state - US Investors' Notice"

Seoul, Jan 23

Two US investors in e-commerce giant Coupang notified the South Korean government of their intent to bring arbitration claims against it over what they called "discriminatory" acts toward the US-listed firm, and requested a US government probe into the matter.

Greenoaks Capital Partners and Altimeter Capital Management took the actions, decrying South Korean authorities' investigations into Coupang following revelations in November about a massive customer data leak, according to documents that their legal representative, Covington & Burling LLP, submitted to the two governments, reports Yonhap news agency.

The Seoul government, along with experts, has been conducting a probe into the incident, in which about 33.7 million customers are believed to have been affected. Coupang has claimed a perpetrator accessed data from only about 3,000 of the accounts in question.

In a notice addressed to President Lee Jae Myung and Chung Hong-sik, the deputy minister for international legal affairs at Seoul's justice ministry, the U.S. investors expressed their intent to file arbitration claims under the South Korea-U.S. free trade agreement. They hold equity interests in Coupang valued at more than US$1.5 billion.

In a separate document sent to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), the investors requested that Washington investigate what they said were "unreasonable" and "discriminatory" acts by the Seoul government against Coupang, and impose "appropriate" trade remedies. They cited Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

The two companies claimed that South Korea's policy enforcement and regulatory pressure regarding Coupang appear to "far exceed" the scrutiny imposed on its domestic Korean and Chinese competitors.

"As Coupang took increasing market share from Korean and Chinese competitors, enforcement actions across the Korea Fair Trade Commission, National Tax Service, Ministry of Employment and Labor, Financial Supervisory Service, and others increased, resulting in hundreds of audits, inspections, and raids and more penalties against Coupang than any other company in Korean history," they said in a joint press release.

Characterising the data breach as a "limited and constrained" incident, they accused the South Korean government of making "false and defamatory" claims, and senior ruling party officials of an "apparent attempt to inflame Korean public opinion and provide cover for efforts to eliminate Coupang and benefit domestic and Chinese competitors."

They also claimed that the Seoul government's "targeted and hostile interference" over the data breach has led to billions of dollars in lost market capitalisation.

"These losses have been borne directly by U.S. shareholders -- including individual investors and institutional funds holding the retirement savings of millions of American workers," they said.

In the notice to the Korean government, the investors claimed that as Coupang was threatening the historical dominance of its Korean and Chinese competitors, the Seoul government began "weaponising the administrative power of the state, and even acting outside its sovereign capacity, to disrupt Coupang's operations."

In the document to the USTR, the investors also pointed out that South Korean Prime Minister Kim Min-seok urged state regulators in December to approach enforcement against Coupang for the data breach "with the same determination used to wipe out mafias.

The company, founded by Korean American entrepreneur Kim Bom-suk, also known as Bom Kim, generates about 90 per cent of its sales in South Korea.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
Interesting to see US investors using trade agreements as a shield. In India, we've seen similar tensions with big tech. A country's sovereignty includes the right to regulate companies for data security. The comparison to wiping out mafias seems extreme, but the principle of strong enforcement is correct. 🇮🇳
R
Rahul R
As an Indian consumer, I side with the Korean government on this. If a data breach of that scale happened in India, we would demand action too. The investors' claim of "discrimination" feels like a pressure tactic. Protecting user data should be the top priority, not shareholder value.
S
Sarah B
While the scale of the investigation seems intense, invoking Section 301 and arbitration so quickly feels aggressive. There should be a dialogue first. However, if the Korean government is applying rules unevenly to favor local champions, that is a legitimate concern for any foreign investor, including those looking at India.
A
Aman W
The core issue is data privacy. Billions in market cap lost? That's the cost of failing to secure user data. Indian companies like ours must learn from this. You can't compromise on customer trust. Jai Hind!
K
Kriti O
A respectful criticism for the Korean government: calling for "mafia"-level determination might be good rhetoric but undermines a fair, evidence-based process. The focus should remain on the facts of the data breach. Due process is important for maintaining trust in the system, something we in India are striving for as well.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50