South Asia Religious Freedom Consultation Flags Gaps, Praises India's Framework

A high-level consultation in New Delhi examined religious freedom challenges across South Asia. A released report highlighted a "Great Divergence," praising India's constitutional framework while critiquing embedded discrimination in neighbours' legal systems. Panels discussed the weak implementation of safeguards in Pakistan and Bangladesh, where discrimination against minorities remains systemic. The event concluded with a call for urgent, context-specific legal and institutional reforms across the region.

Key Points: South Asia Religious Freedom: Institutional Gaps & Regional Concerns

  • Weak implementation of constitutional safeguards in Pakistan & Bangladesh
  • India's judiciary seen as a stabilising force
  • Report highlights 'Great Divergence' in region
  • Calls for urgent legal reforms for vulnerable minorities
3 min read

Consultation on religious freedom in South Asia flags institutional gaps; raises concerns over Pakistan, Bangladesh

Experts highlight weak implementation of constitutional safeguards in Pakistan & Bangladesh, contrasting India's institutional framework in managing religious diversity.

"religious freedom depends not just on laws but on institutional intent and practice - Comparative Report"

New Delhi, February 8

Indraprastha Public Affairs Centre and Shivi Development Society jointly organised a high-level consultation on "Religious Freedom in South Asia," on Friday at the India International Centre, New Delhi, bringing together policymakers, scholars, civil society leaders and legal experts to deliberate on the challenges faced by vulnerable communities across the region.

The event featured in-depth discussions on the roles of institutions, justice delivery mechanisms, and the lived realities of religious minorities in South Asia. Speakers emphasised that while constitutional guarantees exist in countries such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, their effective implementation remains weak, particularly during periods of social and political unrest.

Narendra Kumar, Executive Director of SDS, opened the consultation and emphasised that one of its key objectives was to highlight the strength of India's constitutional and institutional framework in managing religious diversity. He noted that despite social and political pressures, India's judiciary and constitutional safeguards continue to act as stabilising forces, offering lessons for the wider South Asian region.

The event also marked the release of a comparative structural assessment report, "Religious Freedom in South Asia", authored by Bhrigu Bhardwaj, Sheikh Safina and Pengsomir E Borah. It introduced the concept of a "Great Divergence" in the region.

The report argued that while India has strong constitutional protections, in countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, discrimination is deeply embedded within legal and institutional frameworks.

It also highlighted demographic trends, including the sharp decline of Hindu populations in Bangladesh, contrasted with India's continued state support to even its smallest religious minorities, to underline that religious freedom depends not just on laws but on institutional intent and practice.

The first panel, "Role of Institutions and Justice," examined how state institutions in South Asia respond to religious diversity and conflict.

Panellists emphasised the need for stronger implementation of constitutional safeguards in India, alongside urgent legal and institutional reforms in neighbouring countries, particularly Pakistan and Bangladesh, where discrimination against minorities remains entrenched.

The second panel, "Impact on Vulnerable Communities," focused on the everyday realities faced by religious minorities across the region. Speakers highlighted the heightened vulnerability of women at the intersection of religion and gender, drawing attention to practices such as forced conversions in Pakistan as a form of coercion and social control.

The consultation concluded with a call for a more nuanced and context-specific approach to religious freedom in South Asia. Participants stressed the need for urgent legal and institutional reforms in neighbouring countries, especially Pakistan and Bangladesh, where discrimination remains systemic.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an international observer, it's refreshing to see India facilitating these conversations. The "Great Divergence" concept is apt. Constitutional frameworks are crucial, but the real test is their translation into everyday safety and dignity for all citizens, especially women from minority communities.
P
Priya S
The focus on forced conversions in Pakistan is vital. It's a severe human rights issue that doesn't get enough global attention. While we discuss our neighbours, we must also consistently strengthen our own institutions. Judicial independence is our strength, but social harmony is a daily practice. 🙏
V
Vikram M
Good initiative. However, the article seems to present India's framework in a very positive light without equal scrutiny. We have our own gaps in implementation and rising majoritarian pressures. A truly honest consultation should introspect as critically as it analyses neighbours. Balance is key.
R
Rohit P
The demographic data from Bangladesh is shocking but not surprising. It shows a clear pattern. India's secular fabric, despite strains, has held because of its institutions. This is a lesson for the entire subcontinent. Jai Hind!
K
Kavya N
The intersection of religion and gender needs more spotlight. Women often bear the worst brunt in conflicts. Hope the recommendations from this consultation reach the right ears in all SAARC nations. Peace and pluralism are the only way forward for regional prosperity.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50