Pakistan's Gaza Role Could Undermine Hamas Dismantling, Warns Report

A Gatestone Institute report warns that Pakistan's potential participation in a postwar Gaza stabilization force could secretly aid Hamas's survival. The report cites Pakistan's non-recognition of Israel, refusal to designate Hamas as terrorist, and its intelligence agency's historic ties to militant groups. It details how Hamas operates freely in Pakistan, building alliances with local terror outfits. The analysis raises the risk of intelligence leaks and questions Pakistan's reliability as a U.S. ally in such a mission.

Key Points: Report: Pakistan in Gaza Force Risks Hamas Survival

  • Pakistan legitimizes Hamas
  • ISI accused of militant ties
  • Risk of intelligence leaks
  • Questions major non-NATO ally status
2 min read

Concerns raised over Pakistan's possible role in post-war Gaza ISF: Report

Think tank warns Pakistan's potential role in a postwar Gaza force could undermine efforts to dismantle Hamas, citing ties to militant groups.

"risks turning the stabilisation force into a disguised risk for Hamas's survival - Gatestone Institute report"

Washington, Jan 1

Pakistan's potential participation in the US-initiated postwar Gaza 'International Stabilisation Force' could undermine efforts aimed at dismantling Hamas's military infrastructure, a report said on Thursday.

It warned that a mission designed to stabilise Gaza and dismantle Hamas, entrusting security responsibilities to Pakistan, which openly legitimises the terror group-- risks turning the stabilisation force into a disguised risk for Hamas's survival.

"Israeli officials report that three countries have agreed to Washington's request to participate in a postwar Gaza 'International Stabilization Force'. The identities of all three have not been disclosed, though Indonesia may be one of them. Earlier reports also identified Pakistan as a possible contributor to the ISF," a report in New York-based think tank Gatestone Institute highlighted.

"In addition, Pakistan does not officially recognise Israel, and has never designated Hamas as a terrorist organisation. It may well have an interest in making sure that Hamas can continue its 'resistance' -- meaning terrorism," it stated.

According to the report, Pakistan's military and its primary intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), have long been accused of cultivating ties with Islamist militant organisations.

For decades, it said, the ISI fostered Pakistan-based groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), whose ideologies closely align with Hamas. Such connections, the report argued, cast doubt on Pakistan's ability to counter Hamas in a postwar Gaza setting.

"Since the October 7, 2023, massacre, Pakistan's posture toward Hamas has become increasingly encouraging. Hamas representatives have been allowed to operate freely on Pakistani soil, participate in public events, and build alliances with Pakistan-based terror outfits. Such behaviour directly undermines Western efforts to isolate Hamas and raises questions about whether the United States should continue to regard Pakistan as a 'major non-NATO ally'," the report detailed.

Highlighting another major risk involving Pakistan, notably intelligence leakage, it said, "If deployed in Gaza, Pakistani units could quietly pass sensitive information to Hamas or its regional backers under the guise of cooperation. Reports have previously alleged ISI involvement in facilitating Hamas outreach across South Asia, including visits to Bangladesh and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir to energise jihadist networks."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As an Indian, reading this is no surprise. We've seen their tactics in our neighbourhood for decades. Putting them in Gaza is like asking a fox to guard the henhouse. The intelligence leakage risk is very real.
R
Rahul R
The report makes valid points, but we must also consider that isolating Pakistan completely might push them further. Perhaps a monitored, conditional role with strict oversight? Just a thought. The primary goal should be lasting peace in Gaza.
S
Sarah B
Living in Delhi, you hear about cross-border issues often. If they can't control terror groups on their own soil, how will they help in Gaza? This seems like a recipe for disaster and continued instability.
A
Aditya G
Absolutely shocking! After 26/11 and countless other attacks traced back to Pakistan, the world still considers them for such sensitive roles? Wake up, America! Their ISI is part of the problem, not the solution. 😡
N
Nisha Z
The mention of PoJK in the report is important. It shows the pattern of using disputed territories for terror activities. This isn't just about Gaza; it's about a global pattern of behaviour that needs to be addressed firmly.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50