India Rejects Nepal’s Lipulekh Claim, Reaffirms Kailash Yatra Route

India has reiterated its position on Lipulekh, rejecting Nepal's claims of unilateral and artificial enlargement as "untenable." The Ministry of External Affairs confirmed that the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra route via Lipulekh has been in use since 1954. India expressed openness to discuss boundary issues with Nepal but warned against making unilateral claims. Additionally, India is ready to strengthen cooperation with Nepal, including the supply of fertilizers.

Key Points: India Rejects Nepal's Lipulekh Claim, Says Yatra Route Not New

  • India rejects Nepal's Lipulekh territorial claims as "untenable"
  • Kailash Mansarovar Yatra route via Lipulekh has been in use since 1954
  • India open to discussions on boundary issues but opposes unilateral claims
  • India ready to strengthen ties, including fertilizer supply to Nepal
2 min read

"Claim of unilateral, artificial enlargement not correct": India reiterates position of Lipulekh

India reiterates its position on Lipulekh, calling Nepal's territorial claims "untenable" and reaffirming the 1954 Kailash Mansarovar Yatra route.

"The claim of unilateral and artificial enlargement is not correct. - MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal"

New Delhi, May 7

India on Thursday reiterated its position regarding Lipulekh and the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, and slammed the claims of Nepal, calling the unilateral and artificial enlargement incorrect.

The Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, while responding to a query on Nepal's reservations over Lipulekh, recalled the previously issued statement and told the media, "Kailash Mansarovar Yatra has been happening since 1954 through this route. This is not new. So that is where it is. It is not a new development, and I would refer you for more details to the statement that we've issued. We have clearly stated in our statement that the claim of unilateral and artificial enlargement is not correct."

Speaking about other areas of discussion between India and Nepal, Jaiswal said that New Delhi is ready for discussions.

"If there are boundary issues, we are ready to discuss them as well. But making a unilateral claim is not the right way."

When asked about the credibility of media reports suggesting of a Government-to-Government agreement on fertilisers that was made with India by Nepal, Jaiswal informed, "India and Nepal have multi-dimensional relations. Exchanges between the two countries are ongoing. Recently, there was talk about oil; under the cooperation agreement, energy is being provided to them. For fertilisers too, since we have close relations, we want to strengthen them further and will fulfil the required supply."

India on Sunday rejected Nepal's recent territorial claims over Lipulekh Pass, terming the unilateral artificial enlargement as "untenable" as Kathmandu objected to the Kailash Mansarovar route being undertaken through the region.

MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in response to media queries regarding comments made by the Foreign Ministry of Nepal on the border issue in the context of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra that India's position in this regard had been consistent and clear.

Jaiswal further said that with regards territorial claims, India has consistently maintained that such claims are neither justified nor based on historical facts and evidence. "Such unilateral artificial enlargement of territorial claims is untenable."

He said that India remains open to constructive interaction with Nepal on all issues of the bilateral ties.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

T
Tanvi S
I appreciate India's open stance—we're ready to discuss boundary issues with Nepal. But making unilateral claims without evidence is not the right approach. Also, good to see the MEA talking about fertilizers and energy cooperation. Bilateral ties should focus on development, not unnecessary disputes.
R
Ramesh W
I'm a bit concerned about how this will affect the Yatra. The Kailash Mansarovar pilgrimage is sacred to so many Hindus in India. We should ensure the route remains open and accessible. That said, India should also clarify any maps or documents that show the border clearly. Transparency is key.
A
Anjali F
Our MEA is right to reject these baseless claims. Lipulekh is historically part of India, and the Yatra evidence proves it. But let's not forget the human side—Nepal is our neighbor, and we should keep our borders open for trade, travel, and cultural exchange. Diplomacy, not drama. 😊
N
Naveen S
I support India's position—this is not a new issue. But I also think we need to be more careful with our map policies. Sometimes, unclear cartography leads to misunderstandings. Nepal is a friendly nation, and we should resolve this through joint surveys and bilateral talks. Arre, bhai, let's keep the mountains peaceful.
A
Alexander G
The historical context is clear—Kailash Mansarovar Yatra has been conducted via Lipulekh for 70 years. Nepal's objection seems more political than factual. But I hope both sides prioritize the pilgrims and maintain the Yatra route without disruption

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50