NewKerala.com

CJI Orders Probe Into Supreme Court Registry, Slams NCERT Over Judiciary Chapter

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has announced a deep probe into the functioning of the Supreme Court registry, alleging that long-serving officials act on their own whims. Simultaneously, the Supreme Court has issued contempt notices to education officials over an NCERT textbook chapter titled "Corruption in the judiciary". The court rejected NCERT's apology and imposed a blanket ban on the controversial section. CJI Surya Kant described the inclusion as part of a "deep-rooted, well-planned, and orchestrated conspiracy" against the judiciary.

Key Points: CJI Surya Kant Orders Probe Into Supreme Court Registry Functioning

  • Probe into Supreme Court registry
  • Officials accused of overreach
  • NCERT textbook controversy
  • Contempt notices to officials
  • CJI warns of orchestrated conspiracy
3 min read

CJI Surya Kant to order deep-probe into Supreme Court registry functioning, says officials acting on their own

CJI Surya Kant announces a deep probe into the Supreme Court registry and criticizes NCERT for a chapter on judicial corruption in a Class 8 textbook.

"I will order a deep-probe... If I don't correct this before I demit office, I would be failing in my duties. - CJI Surya Kant"

New Delhi, February 26

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Thursday expressed that he will order a deep-probe into the functioning of the Supreme Court registry, stating that certain officials of the registry are allegedly working as per their own whims despite fresh reforms being brought to ensure its smooth functioning.The Chief Justice of India said he was stunned to learn that a plea, after being declined by a three-judge bench, was subsequently listed before another Bench."I will order a deep-probe. There are officials in the Registry who have been here since last 20-30 years. They think we are all here in transit and they are permanent. Therefore, things must happen the way they want. If I don't correct this before I demit office, I would be failing in my duties," the CJI said.The Chief Justice's remarks indicate serious concerns about the administrative functioning of the Supreme Court registry and the perceived overreach by certain long-serving officials who may be circumventing established procedures.The statement comes in the wake of efforts to reform and streamline the registry's operations to ensure efficiency and adherence to judicial protocols.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of India has issued show cause notices to the Secretary of the Department of Education and Literacy (Ministry of Education) and NCERT Director Dinesh Prashad Saklani, asking them to explain why action should not be taken under contempt or other laws for including a sub-chapter titled "Corruption in the judiciary" in the Class 8 NCERT Social Science textbook.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M Pancholi refused to halt suo motu proceedings despite NCERT's apology over the controversial inclusion and imposed a blanket ban on the textbook section. The court warned that any attempt to bypass the order would be considered direct interference with the administration of justice and could attract contempt of court.

The Supreme Court has also directed NCERT to submit detailed records of the Teaching-Learning Materials Committee that approved the chapter, including the names, qualifications, and credentials of all members of the development team.

"They have fired the gun and the judiciary is bleeding today. Today, anybody can say anything. At times, there is a mounting attack on us, and we are aware of it. The material is available online, on the internet, and even in stores. This is a very calculated move -- the entire teaching will be dictated. When you look at how the Indian judiciary is portrayed as corrupt, it becomes evident what message is being sent. The entire teaching community will first be instructed that this is what they have to teach. In reality, not a single section of society has been left untouched. It is a deep-rooted, well-planned, and orchestrated conspiracy." the CJI said.

NCERT had earlier issued an apology and stated that it would review and revise the chapter following proper consultation, acknowledging that the reference to corruption was inappropriate.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I support cleaning up the registry, the reaction to the NCERT chapter seems extreme. Calling it a "deep-rooted conspiracy" is too much. We should be able to discuss institutional challenges in an educational context without it being contempt. A balanced view is needed.
R
Rohit P
This is shocking. How can a plea rejected by one bench be listed before another? This undermines the entire judicial process. CJI Surya Kant is right to take strict action. The integrity of the Supreme Court must be protected at all costs.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, it's concerning to see such strong language from the CJI about a textbook. An apology was issued and revision promised. The contempt route seems heavy-handed. Confidence in institutions grows with openness, not by shielding them from all criticism.
V
Vikram M
Two big issues in one article. The registry probe is an internal administrative necessity. The NCERT issue, however, is about perception. Teaching children about corruption in the judiciary without proper context is indeed dangerous. But calling it a conspiracy? That's a bit much. The court should focus on fixing its own house first.
M
Michael C
The phrase "they think we are all here in transit and they are permanent" speaks volumes about the challenge of reforming any long-established bureaucracy, not just in India. Rooting out entrenched interests is the first step to real change. Good luck to the CJI.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50