Sat, 13 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated May 12, 2026 · 11:55
India News Updated May 12, 2026

CJI Forms Panel to Assess Rs 50,000 Crore Judicial Infrastructure Needs

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has constituted a Judicial Infrastructure Advisory Committee to evaluate the infrastructural requirements of courts nationwide. The committee, headed by Supreme Court judge Justice Aravind Kumar, is expected to seek a government allocation of around Rs 40,000-50,000 crore for the sector. The panel's focus includes mapping infrastructural gaps, modernising judicial facilities, and recommending technology-driven interventions under the e-Courts initiative. An interim report has been directed to be submitted by August 31, with a parliamentary panel earlier flagging concerns over slow expenditure on judicial infrastructure.

CJI forms panel to assess judicial infrastructure needs across India

New Delhi, May 12

In a move aimed at strengthening the justice delivery system, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has constituted a Judicial Infrastructure Advisory Committee to evaluate the infrastructural requirements of courts nationwide.

The committee, headed by Supreme Court judge Justice Aravind Kumar, has been tasked with preparing an assessment of judicial infrastructure needs nationwide and is expected to make a case for a government allocation of around Rs 40,000-50,000 crore for the sector.

An interim report has been directed to be submitted by August 31. Apart from Justice Aravind Kumar, the panel includes Justice Debangsu Basak of the Calcutta High Court, Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, and Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan of the Bombay High Court as members. The Director General of the Central Public Works Department (CPWD), New Delhi, and the Secretary General of the Supreme Court of India will also be part of the panel, with the latter serving as Member Secretary.

The committee is expected to map infrastructural gaps across courts and recommend measures aimed at modernising judicial facilities and improving efficiency in the administration of justice.

Its proposed areas of focus include identifying constraints faced by stakeholders in the justice delivery system, suggesting adequate infrastructure for judges, lawyers, litigants and visitors, and recommending technology-driven interventions for faster disposal of cases.

The panel is also expected to examine issues relating to the computerisation of courts under the e-Courts initiative, citizen-centric digital services, the establishment of modern court complexes, and the improvement of working conditions for judicial officers and court staff.

The development assumes significance amid growing focus on judicial infrastructure and the digitisation of courts across the country. The Centre has also been pushing the digitisation of the judiciary under the e-Courts Mission Mode Project.

The government has allocated Rs 7,210 crore for Phase-III of the e-Courts Mission Mode Project (2023-2027), aimed at transforming Indian courts into digital and paperless institutions.

According to the government, the initiative includes digitisation of legacy records, expansion of video conferencing facilities to courts, jails and hospitals, universal saturation of e-Sewa Kendras, deployment of artificial intelligence-based tools, and creation of cloud-based repositories for judicial data.

In March this year, the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice had expressed concern over the slow pace of expenditure and utilisation of funds by several states under the Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) for Development of Infrastructure Facilities for Judiciary.

In its 162nd Report on the Demands for Grants (2026-27) of the Department of Justice, the panel chaired by Rajya Sabha MP Brij Lal recommended closer monitoring of the scheme to ensure the timely completion of projects and the effective utilisation of funds.

The committee had also flagged deficiencies in digital infrastructure and a lack of adequate network connectivity in courts, recommending that such facilities be uniformly extended to High Courts and subordinate courts across the country.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

Finally some serious attention to judicial infrastructure! 🙏 My father is a lawyer in Chennai and he keeps complaining about the lack of proper video conferencing facilities in our local court. The e-Courts Phase III allocation of ₹7,210 crore is a good start but I hope the committee also looks at basic things like clean washrooms and drinking water for litigants. Technology is important but basic human dignity matters too.

Michael C

Impressive move by CJI Surya Kant. In the US, we take court infrastructure for granted but this kind of systematic assessment is exactly what developing judicial systems need. The inclusion of CPWD and focus on e-courts digitization shows comprehensive planning. However, Rs 40,000-50,000 crore is a huge ask - hope the government backs this with full funding. Justice delayed is justice denied, and better infrastructure directly reduces delays.

Vikram M

Good initiative but I'm skeptical about the execution. The parliamentary committee already flagged slow spending by states under the CSS scheme. What's the guarantee this time will be different? Also, AI-based tools sound fancy but our courts still struggle with basic computer literacy. Let's first get the fundamentals right - proper buildings, reliable electricity, and functional computers - before jumping into AI and cloud repositories. Baby steps matter.

Sarah B

This is genuinely exciting! 🎉 The focus on citizen-centric digital services and video conferencing facilities for jails and hospitals could revolutionize access to justice. In rural India, people travel hours to reach courts - e-filing and virtual hearings could change that completely. I just hope the committee prioritizes connectivity in remote areas. No point having digital courts if internet doesn't reach there.

K We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked