CII Urges Fast-Track PSU Privatisation to Unlock Rs 10 Lakh Crore

The Confederation of Indian Industry has proposed a four-pronged strategy to accelerate the government's privatisation agenda in its Budget recommendations. It suggests a demand-based approach to selecting PSUs for sale and announcing a rolling three-year pipeline to provide investor clarity. CII recommends establishing a dedicated institutional body to manage the process professionally and predictably. The chamber estimates that reducing the government's stake to 51% in 78 listed PSUs could unlock nearly Rs 10 lakh crore in capital.

Key Points: CII Proposes 4-Point Plan to Fast-Track PSU Privatisation

  • Shift to demand-based PSU selection
  • Announce 3-year privatisation pipeline
  • Create dedicated institutional body
  • Use phased stake reduction roadmap
4 min read

CII calls for value unlocking of PSUs through fast-tracking privatisation

CII's Budget proposal urges a demand-based privatisation approach, a 3-year pipeline, and a dedicated body to unlock Rs 10 lakh crore from PSUs.

"A forward-looking privatisation policy... will enable the government to focus on its core functions while empowering the private sector - Chandrajit Banerjee"

New Delhi, January 11

To sustain capital expenditure and address developmental priorities amid global economic uncertainties, the industry chamber Confederation of Indian Industry in its proposals for the Union Budget 2026-27, has urged the Government to mobilise resources through a calibrated approach to privatisation, focusing on sectors where private participation can enhance efficiency, technology infusion, and global competitiveness.

Highlighting the strategic significance of privatisation in the current global economic landscape, Chandrajit Banerjee, Director General, CII, stated that India's growth story is increasingly being powered by private enterprise and innovation.

"A forward-looking privatisation policy, aligned with the vision of Viksit Bharat, will enable the government to focus on its core functions while empowering the private sector to accelerate industrial transformation and job creation."

Against this backdrop, CII has called for accelerating the implementation of the Government's Strategic Disinvestment Policy, which envisions an exit from all Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) in non-strategic sectors and a minimal presence in strategic ones. The strong policy intent sets the direction for this national endeavour.

To strengthen and expedite the privatisation programme, CII has outlined a four-pronged comprehensive strategy.

First, CII recommends a shift to a demand-based approach in selecting PSEs for privatisation.

Presently, the Government identifies specific enterprises for sale and subsequently invites investor interest. However, when sufficient demand or valuation is not achieved, the process often stalls, CII asserted.

CII suggests reversing this sequence by first gauging investor interest across a broader set of enterprises and then prioritising those that attract stronger interest and meet valuation expectations.

Such an approach, CII believes, would ensure smoother execution and better price discovery.

Structured feedback from potential investors could also help address procedural or regulatory bottlenecks.

Second, to provide investors greater clarity and planning time, CII recommends that the Government announce a rolling three-year privatisation pipeline, outlining which enterprises are likely to be taken up for privatisation during this period.

This visibility, CII said, would encourage deeper investor engagement and more realistic valuation and price discovery, which would contribute towards expediting the privatisation process.

Third, an institutional framework can strengthen oversight, accountability, and investor confidence, making privatisation predictable and professionally managed.

CII recommends a dedicated body with a Ministerial Board for strategic guidance, an Advisory Board of industry and legal experts for independent benchmarking, and a professional management team to handle execution, due diligence, market engagement, and regulatory coordination.

This structure would also monitor market developments, stakeholder feedback, and post-privatisation performance to enable continuous improvement, they suggested.

Fourth, recognising that full privatisation of all non-strategic PSEs is a complex and time-consuming, CII recommends a calibrated disinvestment approach combined with a three-year roadmap, as an interim measure.

Government could reduce its stake in listed PSEs in a phased manner to 51 per cent initially, allowing it to remain the single largest shareholder while releasing significant value into the market, CII noted. Over time, this stake could be brought down further to between 33 and 26 per cent.

CII analysis shows that reducing the Government's stake to 51 per cent in 78 listed PSEs could unlock close to Rs 10 lakh crore. In the first two years of the roadmap, disinvestment strategy could target 55 PSEs where the Government holds 75 per cent or less, mobilising around Rs. 4.6 lakh crore.

In the subsequent stage, 23 PSEs with higher Government stakes (over 75 per cent) could be disinvested, potentially bringing in Rs 5.4 lakh crore.

"A calibrated reduction of Government's stake in listed PSEs to 51 per cent and even lower is a pragmatic step that balances strategic control with value creation. Unlocking nearly Rs 10 lakh crore of productive capital would provide vital resources to accelerate physical and social infrastructure development and support fiscal consolidation", highlighted Banerjee.

These measures, CII concluded, can enhance investor confidence, ensure predictable and transparent processes, and maximize value realisation for the Government. By focusing on governance, regulation, and enabling infrastructure while allowing competitive markets to drive efficiency, strategic privatisation can unlock public resources for high-impact areas such as health, education, and green infrastructure, while retaining minimal presence in strategic sectors, supporting a self-reliant and globally competitive economy.

As is the convention, the Budget for 2026-27 will be presented on February 1.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While efficiency is important, we must be very careful. PSUs provide stable employment to lakhs. A purely demand-based approach might only sell the profitable ones, leaving the rest in limbo. What about the job security of existing employees? The human cost needs equal weight.
R
Rohit P
Finally, some sense! So many PSUs are bleeding money due to bureaucracy. Let the private sector run them with proper tech infusion. The money saved can go to schools and hospitals. This is key for Viksit Bharat. The 51% stake idea is a good middle path to start with.
S
Sarah B
As an observer of the Indian economy, the structured four-pronged strategy is impressive. The dedicated institutional framework is crucial for transparency and to avoid allegations of "fire sales." However, execution has always been the challenge. Hope they can walk the talk.
N
Nikhil C
I respectfully disagree with the CII's core premise. Strategic sectors need strong PSU presence for national interest, not "minimal presence." Look at the energy sector. Complete privatisation can lead to profiteering at the cost of the common man. Balance is needed, not a rush.
K
Kavya N
The focus on non-strategic sectors is correct. Why should the government run a hotel chain or a soap company? Let them go. But the process must be transparent to avoid any scandals. The advisory board with industry experts is a good suggestion to ensure fairness.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50