Sun, 14 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 12, 2026 · 08:56
World News Updated Jun 12, 2026

US-Iran MoU Near Finalization, Paving Way for Historic Nuclear Deal

The United States and Iran are expected to finalize a memorandum of understanding next week, initiating 60 days of talks toward a long-term bilateral accord. Iran would commit to a 15-20 year halt on uranium enrichment and dismantle nuclear sites in exchange for staggered financial relief. The deal includes demining operations to reopen the Strait of Hormuz for global trade. President Trump confirmed the diplomatic breakthrough, though Iran's Fars News Agency denied that any initial agreement text has been approved.

Chance for Peace: US-Iran MoU on horizon; initial pact to pave way for long-term treaty

Washington DC, June 12

A letter of intent or memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran is expected to be finalised early next week, paving the way for advanced diplomatic talks towards a long-term bilateral accord, CBS News reported, citing two sources familiar with the ongoing manoeuvres.

The signing of the memorandum would kick off 60 days of talks to negotiate details of a US-Iran agreement, CBS News reported. According to multiple sources, that initial negotiating window could be extended as needed.

Early measures outlined in the text focus on securing "freedom of trade" by conducting demining operations to clear and reopen the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson said that major sections of a potential understanding aimed at ending the imposed war are close to completion, despite Washington's contradictory positions and repeated acts of military aggression aimed at disrupting the diplomatic process.

In principle, Tehran would commit to a lockout of 15-20 years during which it would not enrich uranium and would dismantle its nuclear sites. In exchange for taking these steps, Iran would receive financial relief staggered over time and sequenced to correspond with compliance.

Regarding regional threat capabilities, the US intelligence community does not assess that Iran has a nuclear weapon or sought one, but rather that it sought to be at the threshold of one, CBS News reported.

The Iranian establishment has additionally refused to allow International Atomic Energy Agency nuclear inspectors into Iran to verify what it claimed was the peaceful nature of its programme, though Israeli intelligence maintains a different assessment.

The diplomatic process gained sudden momentum on Thursday when President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that he had "canceled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening."

The president noted that the decision followed confirmation that the final points of a potential deal have been approved by "all parties involved." He added that this consensus included the US and a specific list of Middle East countries, though Iran was not among them.

The president indicated that a "time and place" for a signing would be "announced shortly." He is scheduled to travel next week to France for the G7 summit, where the widespread disruption to global trade caused by the war is expected to be a primary topic of discussion among world leaders.

President Trump previously highlighted the impending diplomatic breakthrough during an unrelated Oval Office event on Thursday afternoon, clarifying that he would not be present for the signing ceremony, but Vice President JD Vance would attend.

The president noted that the high-level meeting could take place as early as this weekend in Europe. While the vice president's office referred policy questions to the White House, the administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

"The strait will open as soon as we have it signed," the president emphasised.

However, the narrative coming out of Washington was quickly contested by Tehran.

Shortly after President Trump's social media post on the potential deal, the Fars News Agency, which is associated with the Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps, quoted a "knowledgeable source close to the Iranian negotiating team."

The source flatly denied the president's claims regarding an initial agreement, stating that "no text of the initial memorandum of understanding with the United States has been approved."

While Israeli authorities have not yet commented on the developments, the president confirmed he had held direct consultations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, alongside discussions with several Arab leaders.

The understanding between the US and Iran would mandate United Nations inspectors from the IAEA to dispose of what President Trump refers to as "nuclear dust" and to inspect the nuclear sites.

This follows a joint military action last June when the US and Israel bombed three nuclear sites, at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Intelligence analysts assess that the enriched nuclear material remains buried under the rubble at those specific locations.

Reiterating Washington's firm stance from the Oval Office, the president said of Iran, "They will not have a nuclear weapon -- they've agreed to that," adding that the regime would not purchase or develop a nuclear weapon "in any way shape or form."

The draft memorandum also factors in the ongoing war in Lebanon involving Iranian proxy Hezbollah, though specific details remain scarce, multiple sources told CBS News.

Israel launched a ground invasion into Lebanon in March after Hezbollah launched rockets across the border, and just this past week, Israeli forces bombed outside Beirut.

The persisting violence has threatened to disrupt US diplomatic attempts to get the Lebanese and Israeli governments to normalise relations and work together against the Hezbollah militia.

The framework aligns with broader strategic parameters laid out earlier this month by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio during his testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Detailing the core requirements for a baseline deal, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that Iran must reopen the Strait of Hormuz and allow international ships to sail through "without being fired upon without paying a toll."

Addressing the panel on the subsequent stages of the roadmap, he added that in phase 2, Iran must commit to "very specific negotiations on highly enriched disposition of the highly enriched uranium that still is buried deep in a mountain somewhere."

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the regime must "agree on negotiating severe and long-term limitations, and or cancellation of enrichment in activity," stipulating that any prospective sanctions relief would be "associated with their commitment and compliance."

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya Seshadri

Typical American grandstanding—Trump announces peace on Truth Social while Iran denies it. India has maintained a balanced relationship with both sides, but this on-again, off-again diplomacy hurts everyone. And what about Hezbollah and Lebanon? They've been bombing Beirut just last week. This "pact" seems like a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. Still, kudos to any effort that stops the war. 🙏

James A

From an Indian perspective, this could slash petrol prices if the Strait opens! But dude, 15-20 years no enrichment? That's a lot of trust. And 'nuclear dust'? The IAEA hasn't been allowed in for years—how do they even verify? Feels like a rushed deal before the G7 summit. Let's see if Iran actually signs or if this is just PR.

Neha E

I want to believe in peace, but as someone who follows Middle East politics, this feels fragile. The article says Iran denies any approved text! So who do we trust? India has always advocated dialogue over war, so I'll cautiously welcome this. But the sanctions relief phasing sounds complicated—like a recipe for more delays. And why is Israel not commenting? That's a red flag. 🚩

Siddharth J

Strategic win for Trump before G7, but as an Indian, I'm worried about the nuclear threshold issue. The US intelligence says Iran doesn't have a bomb—only threshold capability. But Israel disagrees. If the deal fails, we'll be back to square one with higher oil prices. And what about our investments in Chabahar port? Iran is a key partner. Please let this work out. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked