Wed, 2 Sep 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 17, 2026 · 17:15
India News Updated Jul 17, 2026

Centre Challenges Delhi HC Verdict on Passport Tender Outsourcing in SC

The Centre has moved the Supreme Court against a Delhi High Court judgment that quashed the technical evaluation process for outsourcing passport and visa services at four Indian Missions. The Delhi HC had ruled the process was arbitrary and lacked transparency, violating Article 14 of the Constitution. A bench headed by CJI Surya Kant has assured an urgent hearing. The HC also directed the Ministry of External Affairs to issue fresh tender proposals within one month.

Centre moves SC against Delhi HC verdict quashing tender for passport, visa outsourcing at 4 Indian Missions

New Delhi, July 17

The Centre on Friday moved the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court judgment that set aside the technical evaluation process for outsourcing Consular, Passport and Visa services at Indian Missions in Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, Singapore and Canberra.

Appearing before a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta mentioned the matter and sought an urgent hearing on the Union government's plea.

In response, CJI Kant assured that the matter would be listed for hearing on Monday.

In a judgment delivered on July 15, the Delhi High Court had set aside the technical evaluation process for outsourcing CPV services at the four Indian Missions, holding that the assessment of bidders was vitiated by "arbitrariness, irrationality and lack of transparency" in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.

A Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetrapal and Shail Jain allowed a batch of petitions filed by E Trav Tech Limited and Verasys Limited, which had challenged their disqualification at the technical bid stage in tenders floated by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).

The Delhi HC held that while courts ordinarily do not sit in appeal over technical assessments by expert bodies, judicial review is warranted where the decision-making process is arbitrary, opaque and fails to satisfy the constitutional requirements of fairness, transparency and equality.

It observed that although the government had furnished parameter-wise marks following the directions of the Supreme Court, it failed to disclose the basis on which those marks were awarded, leaving the bidders without any means to ascertain why their otherwise compliant proposals were considered inferior to competing bids.

Finding significant inconsistencies in the marking process, the Justice Kshetrapal-led Bench said materially identical proposals and supporting documents had been awarded substantially different scores across different Missions without any recorded reasons.

Setting aside the technical evaluations, the Delhi HC also nullified the award of contracts in favour of the successful private bidders and directed the MEA and the concerned Indian Missions to issue fresh Requests for Proposal (RFPs) within one month and make sincere efforts to complete the tender process expeditiously. However, it permitted existing service providers to continue operating until the fresh tender process is completed to ensure there is no disruption in public services.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

Typical bureaucracy! 😤 The MEA can't even run a tender properly for passport services. When ordinary Indians face delays at passport offices, no one bats an eye. But now our embassies abroad will have to redo everything. At least the HC allowed existing providers to continue - imagine the chaos if passport services stopped.

James A

Having dealt with Indian missions abroad, this is no surprise. The whole process feels opaque. The Delhi HC was right to flag the lack of transparency in marking. If they can't even run a proper tender, how can we trust them with critical services? Fresh RFPs are needed, but hope it doesn't drag on like most govt processes.

Sarah B

I live in Singapore and the passport services here need improvement. Long queues and inconsistent service levels. This tender mess just shows the problem runs deeper - poor management and lack of accountability. The HC's order for fresh tenders is good, but implementation is key. Hopefully the SC will ensure speed and fairness.

Vikram M

The HC judgment highlights a serious issue - 'arbitrariness, irrationality and lack of transparency' in government tenders. This isn't just about passport services, it's a systemic problem. The MEA should have learned from past court orders on transparency. Now they have to redo everything in 4 missions. Wasting taxpayer money on legal fees and re-tendering. Aur kya chahiye? (What more do they need?)

Rohit P

The SC intervention is welcome but let's be honest - this will take months. Meanwhile, NRIs like me have to deal with the same passport visa chaos. The HC already gave

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked