Punjab Farmers Win Border Field Access After Mann-Shah Meet on Fencing Shift

Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann announced a major relief for border farmers after meeting Union Home Minister Amit Shah, with the Centre agreeing in principle to shift the BSF fencing closer to the International Border. This will make thousands of acres of farmland accessible without daily hardship. Mann also raised strong objections to the proposed Seeds Bill 2025, arguing it limits Punjab's representation and lacks farmer compensation. He reiterated Punjab's firm stance that it has no surplus water to share, making the Sutlej-Yamuna Link canal non-viable.

Key Points: Centre Agrees to Shift BSF Fencing, Easing Punjab Farmer Access

  • Border fencing shift to aid farmers
  • Objections to Seeds Bill 2025
  • Firm 'no' to SYL canal construction
  • Pending funds & state role issues raised
  • Seed import risks highlighted
3 min read

Centre agrees to allow farmers to cultivate fields near Pak border, says Punjab CM after meeting HM Shah

Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann announces Centre's in-principle agreement to shift border fencing, allowing farmers to cultivate thousands of acres. Key state issues also raised.

Centre agrees to allow farmers to cultivate fields near Pak border, says Punjab CM after meeting HM Shah
"Punjab has no surplus water to share with any other state. - Bhagwant Mann"

New Delhi, Jan 17

Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, on Saturday, announced a major relief for farmers in the state's border belt after the Central government agreed in principle to shift the Border Security Force closer to the International Border, a move that will clear the way for cultivation of thousands of acres of farmland currently trapped beyond the fencing.

Calling on Union Home Minister Amit Shah here, the Chief Minister said farmers have long been forced to cross the fence with identity cards and under BSF escort to reach their own fields, facing daily hardship and uncertainty along the 532-km India-Pakistan border where fencing lies deep inside Punjab's territory.

He said the Home Minister told him during the meeting that the issue is under active consideration and that the fencing will be shifted towards the border, bringing Punjab's land back on the accessible side without compromising national security.

Alongside the border issue, CM Mann also raised a series of long-pending concerns, including state's objections to the proposed Seeds Bill 2025, the unresolved Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) dispute, slow movement of foodgrains by the Food Corporation of India, freezing of Arthiya Commission, non-payment of Rural Development Fund (RDF) and Mandi Fund, and the dilution of state's role in Chandigarh's administration, seeking prompt and time-bound resolution of these matters.

Raising serious objections to the proposed Seeds Bill 2025, the Chief Minister said, "Punjab is an agrarian state and one of the largest grain producing states of the country, yet the draft Seed Bill does not assure representation of the state as per schedule under the relevant section. The zone-based system introduced in the Bill does not guarantee Punjab's representation in the Central Seed Committee, unlike the existing system, thereby limiting the state's voice in decisions that directly affect the seed sector."

Chief Minister Mann added, "The proposed Bill also curtails the existing powers of the State Seed Committee, as there is no role envisaged for the state-level committee in seed registration, and the draft is silent on a robust compensation framework for farmers who suffer losses when registered seed fails to perform as claimed."

He said that seed varieties tested and released in foreign countries have been allowed for import and sale in Punjab and other states without compulsory multi-location testing under state-specific agro climatic conditions, posing serious risks to farmers.

Reiterating the state's long-standing position on river waters, the Chief Minister said, "Punjab has no surplus water to share with any other state. There has been a substantial reduction in the availability of Sutlej, Ravi and Beas waters, and therefore construction of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal is not viable."

He noted that of the 34.34 mean annual flow (MAF) of water from these rivers, Punjab was allocated only 14.22 MAF, about 40 per cent, while the remaining 60 per cent was allocated to Haryana, Delhi and Rajasthan, even though none of these rivers actually flow through those states.

"This is a gross injustice with Punjab, and there is absolutely no question of constructing this canal as it is totally against the interests of the state and its people," he asserted, adding Punjab's stand before the Supreme Court remains firm that there is no water to spare.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While the border decision is positive, the Seeds Bill issue is deeply concerning. Allowing foreign seeds without proper testing in Punjab's conditions is a recipe for disaster for our farmers. The Centre must listen to the state on this—they know their land best.
R
Rohit P
SYL canal is a dead issue. How can you give 60% of Punjab's river water to states where these rivers don't even flow? It's a historical injustice. No government, state or central, should even entertain this idea anymore. Punjab's farmers are already struggling with depleting groundwater.
P
Priyanka N
Good step on the border fencing. But the meeting seems like a long list of grievances. The non-payment of RDF and Mandi Fund is crippling our rural infrastructure. Hope this isn't just an announcement before elections and actual funds are released soon.
D
David E
Respectfully, while the farmer's plight is important, national security cannot be compromised. The BSF does an incredible job in a difficult region. Any shift in fencing must be done after thorough technical and strategic assessment, not just as a political concession.
K
Kavya N
Finally some action! My uncle has land near Amritsar and the daily hassle is unreal. This will restore dignity to farmers. But the central government needs to address all the other issues too, especially the seed bill. Our annadata cannot be guinea pigs for untested seeds. 🚜

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50