Wed, 15 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 15, 2026 · 21:15
Bollywood News Updated Jul 15, 2026

Ram Gopal Varma Demands Ban on Censor Board, Calls System Outdated

Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma has called for the abolition of India's film censorship system, labeling it outdated and idiotic in the digital age. He argues that government-appointed committees should not decide what adults can watch, as adults are trusted to vote and make life decisions. Varma points out that censorship often backfires, creating more demand for content, as seen with the film Obsession. He urges the industry to challenge the censor board's existence in courts and public discourse.

'CENSOR should be BANNED': Ram Gopal Varma goes off on censorship, says it is killing Indian cinema

Mumbai, July 15

Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma has called for the abolition of film censorship in India, saying the current system is outdated and questioning why adults should not be allowed to decide what they want to watch.

In a post that he shared on X, Varma launched a scathing attack on film censorship in India arguing that in today's digital age, where people have easy access to content from around the world, censoring films no longer makes sense.

Calling the present system outdated, Varma questioned the role of government-appointed members who decide what audiences can or cannot watch.

"In an era of smartphones, global streaming, and access to infinite information, to pretend that a government-appointed committee can shield adults from a filmmaker's perspective of any truth is not only outdated, but it's also idiotic," he wrote.

The filmmaker also questioned why adults who are trusted to vote and make important life decisions are not trusted to choose the films they want to watch.

"An 18-year-old can choose the leader of the country, but needs some random committee member to decide if hearing a cuss word or watching a shot is corruptive. That's not safeguarding society but infantilising it," he said.

Speaking about censorship in the internet era, he said removing scenes from theatrical releases has little effect because uncut versions are often available online soon after release.

"Cutting a scene for theatrical release is laughable because the uncut version will hit torrents, Telegram and international platforms within hours. Censorship doesn't hide content; it actually creates more demand," he said.

Referring to the Hollywood film Obsession, Varma said a scene removed by the censor board was later watched by many more people on social media than it would have been in theatres.

"Case in point is the head banging scene in OBSESSION which after the censors cut it , must have been seen by 10 times more people on Insta reels than who actually watched the film in the theatres

Censorship doesn't hide content .. it actually creates more demand an in the times of AI tools and borderless internet, gatekeeping is a joke."

"I think it's time for the industry to come together to challenge the very existence of the censor board in its present form, both in courts and public discourse. Democracy demands free expression, and in a connected world, isolating and mutilating cinema is not just being blind and deaf--it is actually suicidal for our growth," he concluded.

For the unversed, Obsession was given an 'A' certificate by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) after 38 seconds of footage were removed. The cuts included scenes of extreme violence, graphic sexual content and nudity.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Michael C

As someone who moved from the US to India, I find Indian censorship bizarre. Back home, we have ratings but no government cutting scenes. The censor board needs to be modernized, not abolished wholesale. But Varma's frustration is understandable - the current system is indeed laughable when torrents exist.

Priya S

Totally agree with RGV! The censor board thinks they're protecting our sanskriti but really they're just confusing the audience. If an 18-year-old can vote, they can handle a cuss word in a film. And honestly, the whole 'A' certificate thing just makes people more curious to watch uncut versions on Telegram. Bhai, just give ratings and let adults decide! 🔥

Nitin Z

While Varma makes valid arguments, abolishing censorship entirely is too radical. We still need some checks for hate speech, extreme violence, and child protection. But yes, the current system is outdated. The board should focus on certifications and guidelines, not arbitrary cuts. Maybe move to a rating system like the US? 🇮🇳🎥

Jessica F

Coming from Australia, this debate is fascinating. Our classification board gives ratings without cutting content. The Obsession example Varma gives is spot on - cutting a scene creates a black market for it. India needs to trust its citizens more, but also protect children. It's a balance, not an either-or.

Arjun K

RGV has been saying this for years. The censor board works like a police station for creativity. They cut scenes from 'Satyam Shivam Sundaram' in the 1970s and still doing same nonsense.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked