Snapdeal Fined Rs 5 Lakh by CCPA for Selling Non-Standard Toys

The Central Consumer Protection Authority has imposed a Rs 5 lakh penalty on Snapdeal for facilitating the sale of toys that did not meet mandatory Bureau of Indian Standards. The investigation found non-compliant toys were sold as recently as December 2025, with the platform earning fees from these transactions. The CCPA rejected Snapdeal's defense of being a passive marketplace, noting its control over promotions and quality tags placed responsibility on it. Snapdeal has stated it remains compliant and will seek judicial review of the order.

Key Points: CCPA fines Snapdeal Rs 5 lakh for non-BIS compliant toys

  • Rs 5 lakh penalty for unfair trade practices
  • Sale of non-BIS compliant toys
  • Platform earned fees from violative sales
  • CCPA rejects "marketplace" defense
  • Directed to ensure no future non-compliant listings
3 min read

CCPA takes action against Snapdeal, imposes Rs 5 lakh penalty for sale of non-compliant BIS standard toys

CCPA imposes Rs 5 lakh penalty on Snapdeal for facilitating sale of toys violating mandatory BIS standards. Details on the probe and platform's response.

"remains committed to providing a safe and trusted platform for consumers - Snapdeal spokesperson"

New Delhi, February 16

The Central Consumer Protection Authority has imposed a penalty of Rs 5,00,000 on Snapdeal "for engaging in unfair trade practices and misleading advertisements by facilitating the sale of non-BIS compliant toys" on its platform. According to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution release, CCPA has taken strict action against e-commerce entities and sellers for the sale of toys in violation of the mandatory Toys Order, 2020 and prescribed Bureau of Indian Standards standards.

CCPA, led by Chief Commissioner Nidhi Khare and Commissioner Anupam Mishra, has issued a final order against Snapdeal (Ace Vector Limited) for the sale of toys that fail to conform to mandatory BIS Standards, the release said.

Commenting on the penalty, Snapdeal spokesperson said the company "remains committed to providing a safe and trusted platform for consumers and ensures compliance under laws as applicable".

CCPA said its investigation revealed that toys were being sold on Snapdeal in violation of the quality standards that became mandatory on January 1, 2021.

The CCPA observed that despite claims of delisting, non-compliant toys remained available on the platform as recently as December 2025. The platform earned fees amounting to Rs 41,032 from the sale of these toys through two identified sellers, Stallion Trading Company and Thriftkart.

Lapses identified during the probe included a lack of transparency, as many listings lacked the manufacturer's name, address, and mandatory BIS certification numbers. The CCPA noted that the platform relied solely on seller self-declarations without independent verification, which the authority deemed "inadequate" for preventing the listing of hazardous products. Furthermore, the CCPA rejected Snapdeal's defense that it acts as a "marketplace e-commerce entity" similar to a physical shopping mall.

The authority stated that Snapdeal exerted "substantial control" over transactions by managing platform-wide promotional sales like "Toofan Sale" and tagging products with quality assurances such as "great quality at best price."

The CCPA observed that the shift from "caveat emptor" (let the buyer beware) to "caveat venditor" (let the seller beware) placed the burden of ensuring product safety squarely on both the seller and the facilitating platform. It held that toys which do not conform to the compulsory standards are liable to be held "defective" under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

According to the release, CCPA further highlighted that Snapdeal failed to provide a guarantee or categorical undertaking that listings of non-BIS compliant toys would not reappear on the platform. Consequently, the authority directed the platform to ensure that no non-compliant BIS standard toy is listed or advertised in the future.

Snapdeal was also ordered to prominently display contact numbers and Grievance Officer details to facilitate prompt consumer redressal. This action followed notices previously issued to other entities, including Amazon and Flipkart, for similar violations of quality control orders.

Following the CCPA order, Snapdeal spokesperson also said the company will seek appropriate judicial review in due course.

"As a marketplace, Snapdeal remains committed to providing a safe and trusted platform for consumers and ensures compliance under laws as applicable. The issue with regards to intermediary liability in similar matters are pending decisions by various high courts. The company will seek appropriate judicial review in due course," the spokesperson said.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Finally! E-commerce sites can't just hide behind the "we're just a platform" excuse. If you control the sales, promotions, and take a commission, you are responsible for what's sold. Good order by the authority. 👏
A
Aman W
As a parent, this is terrifying. We trust these big names to sell safe toys. Relying on seller self-declaration is a joke. Snapdeal needs a proper verification system. The penalty should have been higher to really make them feel it.
S
Sarah B
While the action is correct, I hope this doesn't just become about penalties. The focus should be on building a system where non-compliant products can't be listed at all. The "caveat venditor" principle is the need of the hour for online shopping.
K
Karthik V
They earned 41k from these sales but got a 5 lakh fine. Serves them right! But what about Amazon and Flipkart mentioned at the end? Are they facing similar actions? Consistency is key for consumer trust.
N
Nikhil C
A respectful criticism: The order says they failed to guarantee non-compliant toys won't reappear. That's the real challenge. The CCPA must have a strong monitoring mechanism to check compliance repeatedly, not just issue one-time orders.
M
Meera T

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50