Snapdeal Fined ₹5 Lakh for Selling Non-BIS Certified, Hazardous Toys

The Central Consumer Protection Authority has imposed a ₹5 lakh penalty on Snapdeal for facilitating the sale of toys that violate the mandatory BIS standards under the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020. The CCPA found that non-compliant toys remained on the platform despite claims of delisting, and Snapdeal earned fees from their sale. The authority rejected Snapdeal's defense of being a mere marketplace, stating it exerts substantial control over transactions and must ensure product safety. The order shifts liability to the platform, holding it responsible for ensuring all listed goods meet compulsory safety standards.

Key Points: Snapdeal Fined ₹5 Lakh for Selling Non-BIS Certified Toys

  • ₹5 lakh penalty on Snapdeal
  • Sale of non-BIS compliant toys
  • Violation of Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020
  • Platform held vicariously liable
  • Inadequate seller verification
4 min read

CCPA takes action against E-commerce entities for selling toys that violates mandatory Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020

CCPA fines Snapdeal ₹5 lakh for facilitating sale of non-BIS compliant toys, violating consumer rights and mandatory quality standards.

"The onus is on the platform to ensure that every listed product meets the safety and quality standards. - CCPA Order"

New Delhi, February 17

The Central Consumer Protection Authority has taken strict action against e-commerce entities and sellers for the sale of toys in violation of the mandatory Toys Order, 2020 and prescribed Bureau of Indian Standards standards. In this regard, the CCPA has imposed a penalty of ₹5,00,000 on Snapdeal for engaging in unfair trade practices and misleading advertisements by facilitating the sale of non-BIS compliant toys on its platform, in violation of consumer rights.

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA), led by Chief Commissioner Mrs Nidhi Khare and Commissioner Mr. Anupam Mishra, has issued a final order against Snapdeal (Ace Vector Limited) for the sale of toys that fail to conform to mandatory BIS Standards.

The CCPA took suo-moto cognisance of the matter, discovering that toys were being sold on Snapdeal in violation of the Toys (Quality Control) Order, 2020, which became mandatory on 01st January, 2021. A detailed investigation revealed several critical lapses:

Continued Non-Compliance: Despite claims of delisting, non-compliant toys remained available on the platform as recently as December 2025.

Commercial Benefit from the products sold: Snapdeal earned fees amounting to ₹41,032 from the sale of these non-compliant toys through just two identified sellers: Stallion Trading Company and Thriftkart.

Lack of Transparency: Many listings lacked essential information, such as the manufacturer's name, address, and mandatory BIS certification numbers.

Inadequate Due Diligence: The platform relied solely on seller self-declarations without independent verification, which the CCPA deemed "inadequate" for preventing the listing of hazardous products.Snapdeal took its defence as it acts as a "marketplace e-commerce entity" similar to a physical shopping mall. The CCPA categorically rejected this analogy, noting that Snapdeal exerts "substantial control" over transactions by:

Managing platform-wide promotional sales like "Toofan Sale" and "Deal of the Day".

Tagging products with quality assurances such as "great quality at best price," which acts as a false guarantee when applied to non-compliant BIS standard goods

The CCPA observed that the shift from caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) to caveat venditor (let the seller beware) places the burden of ensuring product safety squarely on both the seller and the facilitating platform. Consequently, the onus is on the platform to ensure that every listed product meets the safety and quality standards, such as the BIS certification for toys, and it remains vicariously liable for any deficiency in service or defect in goods that reach the consumers through its portal.

The CCPA further noted that when enquired about providing a guarantee for the sale of BIS compliant toys on its platform in future, the opposite party failed to provide a guarantee or categorical undertaking that, henceforth, listings or exhibition of non-BIS complaint toys would not reappear on the platform.

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) had issued notices to e-commerce entities and the sellers, such as Amazon, Flipkart and Snapdeal, Stallion Trading Company, electronics bazar store, etc., for the sale of toys in violation of QCO and BIS standards directed for compulsory use by the Central Government.

Section 2(10) the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, "defect" means any fault, imperfection or shortcoming in the quality, quantity, potency, purity or standard which is required to be maintained by or under any law for the time being in force or under any contract, express or implied or as is claimed by the trader in any manner whatsoever in relation to any goods or product and the expression "defective" shall be construed accordingly. Thus, toys which do not conform to the compulsory standards are liable to be held 'defective' under the Act.

Failure to comply with these standards constitutes misleading advertisement and unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules, 2020 stipulate that no e-commerce entity shall adopt any unfair trade practice, whether in the course of business on its platform or otherwise.

The Authority has imposed a penalty of ₹5,00,000 for engaging in unfair trade practices and misleading advertisements. The authority has also directed Snapdeal to:

Ensure Future Compliance: Guarantee that no non-compliant BIS standard toy is listed, hosted, or advertised on its platform in the future.

Prominently display contact numbers, email addresses, and Grievance Officer Details to facilitate prompt consumer redressal.

The Authority reaffirmed its commitment to protecting consumer rights, preventing unfair trade practices and ensuring a safe and transparent digital marketplace, and urged all e-commerce platforms to exercise strict regulatory verification and accurate disclosures.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Good move by CCPA. But the penalty seems too low for a company like Snapdeal? They earned fees from these sales. The "marketplace" defense is just an excuse to avoid responsibility. They control the platform, they must ensure compliance. Period.
A
Aman W
This is a welcome step for consumer protection in India. The shift from 'buyer beware' to 'seller beware' is crucial in the digital age. Hope other e-commerce giants like Amazon and Flipkart are also under scrutiny. Transparency is key.
S
Sarah B
While I support the action, I hope this doesn't just become a one-time fine and then business as usual. The order says Snapdeal couldn't even guarantee future compliance. That's worrying. Continuous audits and heavier penalties for repeat offenses are needed.
V
Vikram M
As a small seller on other platforms, I have to jump through hoops for documentation. If big platforms get away with just self-declarations, it's unfair competition. Due diligence should be mandatory for all. Kudos to CCPA for calling out the "inadequate" checks.
K
Kavya N
This is very important. We often buy toys online for convenience and lower prices. But what's the use if they are hazardous? The tags like "great quality" are totally misleading. Consumers need to be more aware and check for BIS marks themselves too.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50