SC Slams WhatsApp's "Take It or Leave It" Privacy Policy, Data Sharing

The Supreme Court has expressed serious concerns over WhatsApp's 2021 privacy policy and its parent company Meta's data-sharing practices, calling it a "take it or leave it" arrangement that leaves users with no real choice. The court sharply observed that the platform cannot be allowed to "play with the right to privacy" of Indian citizens, questioning how ordinary users like a street vendor could understand the complex policy language. The remarks came during hearings on appeals against a Competition Commission of India penalty upheld by the NCLAT. The bench has directed Meta and WhatsApp to file an affidavit explaining their privacy policy and data-sharing mechanisms.

Key Points: SC Flags WhatsApp Privacy Policy, Data Sharing Concerns

  • SC criticizes WhatsApp's "take it or leave it" privacy policy
  • Court questions fairness for ordinary users
  • Hearing appeals against CCI's Rs 213 crore penalty
  • Concern over targeted ads after personal chats
  • Court directs Meta, WhatsApp to file affidavit
3 min read

'Can't play with right to privacy': SC flags concerns over WhatsApp privacy policy, data sharing

Supreme Court criticizes WhatsApp's 2021 privacy policy as a "take it or leave it" arrangement that compromises user privacy and data.

"You cannot play with the right to privacy of this country. You are making a mockery of constitutionalism. - Supreme Court"

New Delhi, Feb 3

The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed serious concern over WhatsApp's 2021 privacy policy and the sharing of user data by its parent company Meta Platforms, observing that the platform cannot be allowed to "play with the right to privacy" of Indian users.

The court's remark came as a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi was hearing appeals filed by Meta Platforms and WhatsApp LLC against a National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) order, which had upheld a Rs 213.14 crore penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The CCI has also filed a cross-appeal challenging the NCLAT decision insofar as it allowed WhatsApp to share user data for advertising purposes.

Agreeing to admit the appeals, the CJI Kant-led Bench made sharp observations on the nature of WhatsApp's privacy policy, describing it as a "take it or leave it" arrangement that leaves consumers with no real choice.

"What is the choice? You have complete monopoly in the market, and you are saying you are giving a choice. It is either you walk out of WhatsApp, or we will share your data," the apex court remarked.

During the hearing, the CJI-led Bench repeatedly flagged concerns about the fairness of the privacy policy, particularly for ordinary users.

"A poor woman selling fruits on the street - will she understand the terms of your policy? The language is so cleverly drafted that even some of us may not understand it," the top court said.

Describing the alleged data practices as deeply problematic, the Supreme Court observed: "This is a decent way of committing theft of private information. You cannot play with the right to privacy of this country. You are making a mockery of constitutionalism."

It also expressed concern over instances of targeted advertisements appearing soon after personal communications, even as WhatsApp reiterated that its messaging services are end-to-end encrypted and that it cannot read user conversations.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, supported the apex court's concerns, stating that personal data today has clear monetary value and is being commercially exploited.

After an extensive hearing, the CJI Kant-led Bench directed Meta and WhatsApp to file an affidavit explaining their privacy policy and data-sharing mechanisms, including how user consent is obtained and communicated. The apex court also impleaded the Union government as a party to the proceedings. The matter has been posted for further hearing next week.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
It's about time. The "take it or leave it" policy is a joke when WhatsApp is essential for work, family, and everything. Where do we leave to? Signal doesn't have the same network effect. They have us trapped.
D
David E
While I agree with the principle, I hope the court's intervention leads to clear, practical regulations and not just more legal battles. Data is the new oil, and India needs a robust framework, not just strong words.
A
Ananya R
The targeted ads part is so creepy! You talk about planning a trip with a friend and suddenly your Instagram is flooded with hotel ads. They say they can't read messages, but the coincidence is too much. SC is right to question this.
V
Vikram M
A 213 crore penalty is peanuts for Meta. The real issue is the business model itself. Until we have a strong Indian alternative or strict data localization laws, this will keep happening. Jai Hind!
S
Sarah B
Respectfully, while privacy is paramount, I hope the scrutiny is balanced. Over-regulation could stifle innovation and affect services we all use daily. The affidavit should provide much-needed clarity.
K
Karthik V
"You cannot play with the right to privacy of this country." Powerful words from

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50