Build resilience now to protect India's 267 GW renewable pipeline, report by Zurich group says
New Delhi, June 28
India can act now, while many of these assets are still in planning or construction, and resilience can still be built in at the lowest cost, Zurich Group said in a report, warning that 90 per cent of the country's planned renewable energy sites face high or critical physical climate risk by 2030.
The analysis of 871 sites across ten states, with a combined planned capacity of about 267 GW, found that "66 per cent are rated critical by 2030."
"That is not a reason for alarm; it is a reason to act now," the report said.
Solar dominates the pipeline, accounting for 593 sites and 182,286 MW, or "nearly 70 per cent of total assessed capacity."
Wind makes up 230 sites and 44,177 MW, while hydropower, though only 48 sites, contributes 40,188 MW and "carries disproportionately high financial exposure due to the capital intensity of this type of civil infrastructure."
Zurich identified tornado, wildfire, flood and hail as the main hazards. For solar, "hail creates both direct visible damage -- shattering glass layers -- and hidden defects that degrade performance over time and only appear later through reduced output."
Wind projects face "extreme wind events, flooding and the wider consequences of intensifying monsoon and cyclone patterns," while hydropower "increasingly depends on recognising that historical hydrology is a weak guide to future performance."
The report outlined five steps: make climate risk screening mandatory at planning, stress-test the highest-risk assets first, build hazard-specific resilience into procurement, treat system resilience as part of asset resilience, and use resilience quantification to unlock capital.
It estimated that "an indicative resilience investment of around 2 per cent of CAPEX could reduce severe-loss exposure by as much as 75 per cent," corresponding to "an avoided-loss multiple of approximately 38x."
A case study of a 2.5 GW solar project showed that without resilience measures, Value at Risk was "approximately USD 178.5 million," but with a hail-storm tracker, the loss was reduced to USD 43 million."
The incremental cost was about USD 34 million, or "a 30 per cent increase relative to a fixed-tilt system." "Resilience, embedded at the design stage, is not an additional cost. It is a practical enabler of bankable, insurable and sustainable energy infrastructure," Zurich said.
— ANI
Reader Comments
Good to see Zurich putting numbers behind what many of us working on ground have been sensing. The hail damage on solar panels is a big hidden cost — many operators ignore micro-cracks until it's too late. We need NDMA and MNRE to make these risk assessments compulsory before approval. 🙏
While the report is useful, I wish they had included specific state-level vulnerabilities rather than just a national overview. Rajasthan's sandstorms are different from Gujarat's cyclones or Assam's floods. 'Resilience' must be location-specific, not a one-size-fits-all formula. Still, a needed wake-up call for policymakers.
Finally someone is saying what many of us have been worried about. I work in solar EPC and we've seen panels fail within 3-4 years due to extreme heat and dust storms, let alone hail. The 2% upfront cost sounds small, but in our tenders, every rupee is squeezed. Government must incentivise resilience, not just lowest tariffs. 😓
As an investor, this report gives me confidence that the sector is being analysed properly. The 'stress-test' approach is long overdue — we cannot continue building infrastructure based on past climate data. The case study on the 2.5 GW project shows real numbers. I hope more developers adopt hail trackers and structural reinforcements.
Honestly, this seems like common sense that should have been applied from day one. But better late than never. The point about hydropower being disproportionately exposed is critical — those projects involve
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.