"Borrow by morning, pay by evening": SEBI Chairman lays out daytime liquidity blueprint for mutual funds
Mumbai, June 19
SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey addressed the media during a press conference on the outcomes of the market regulator's board meeting in Mumbai on Friday, where a primary focus of the briefing centered on mutual fund liquidity.
Responding to a question from ANI on how allowing mutual funds to use intraday borrowing for settlement mismatches would help manage daytime liquidity without introducing unwanted leverage, Pandey explained that the framework prevents speculative risks.
He stated, "That we have already said that whatever intraday borrowing you will do, there will be no square odds in it. If you need money in the morning, your money is coming in the evening, so the money coming in the morning is coming in the evening, in between that, if you need money in the morning, so if you don't have borrowing, then from where will you get that money? So, by doing that borrowing, you will be able to repay that money in the evening. So, paying payout. So, the requirement of paying is of the morning, and the payment of payout is of the evening."
The Chairman further clarified that while funds face cash demands from multiple avenues, such as market margins, they are mandated to square up before day-end.
"And if you are not able to square up, if you are not able to do zero, then it will convert into overnight borrowing. Now, overnight borrowing will not be able to take your leverage out of the regulatory limit. It will remain a reception. So, there will be cash management and leverage will also be controlled."
Beyond mutual funds, Pandey detailed several structural changes approved by the Board. On the newly approved 66-day timeline for buy-backs, he explained that "66 working days, what you said is actually amounts to 3 months roughly... but it's better to go for working days than to go for three months calendar days."
He emphasized that freezing promoter shares at the ISIN level ensures preventive compliance, adding that "even the people whose accounts are frozen, because they feel, yeah that's good, even by mistake I cannot trade in that share."
Regarding investor protection in long-term corporate investigations, Pandey remarked that protection comes through multiple avenues like market responses and disclosures, cautioning that "very quickly going without doing an adequate, giving a chance to the companies, that's also not fair... It cuts both ways."
Addressing the massive pipeline of filings, including queries regarding the NSE IPO, Pandey maintained that SEBI utilizes a fast-track process, dedicating extra resources to handle due diligence "within a reasonable time" without compromising quality.
For asset transmission under the Quick Transmission Processing (QTP) category, he discussed standardizing requirements across RTAs through Stage 2 Processing (STP) while balancing safety constraints for high-value cases.
On bond tokenization and municipal bonds, Pandey estimated that tokenization pilots would take "6 to 9 months" to align technology, while municipal bonds could leverage pooled vehicles to help smaller urban bodies cross nascent market thresholds.
Finally, on the derivative market, he announced an active analytical study evaluating trading impacts. "We expect to release it in June," Pandey concluded, promising that "it will give you a lot of things to write about."
— ANI
Reader Comments
As a retail investor, I appreciate the clarity on 66 working days for buybacks. But I'm worried about tokenization - 6 to 9 months is too slow. We need faster implementation to make municipal bonds accessible to common people like us. India's bond market needs this push now, not next year. 😕
Good move on freezing promoter shares at ISIN level - finally some teeth for SEBI! But I wish they'd focus more on the pending NSE IPO. It's been hanging for years, and retail investors are losing opportunities. The fast-track process sounds good on paper, but execution matters more.
The intraday borrowing concept is innovative but needs careful monitoring. If not implemented properly, it could lead to systemic risk. Also, the 66 working day timeline for buybacks - why not 45 calendar days like before? This seems like a step back for shareholder value. 🤔
Interesting take on investor protection during long-term investigations. The chairman's point about giving companies a fair chance before acting is reasonable - haste makes waste in regulatory matters. But I hope this doesn't become an excuse for delaying justice in fraud cases. Balance is key.
SEBI should also look at simplifying the QTP process for asset transmission. My father passed away last year, and I spent 6 months running around with paperwork. Standardizing requirements across RTAs is welcome, but safety constraints shouldn't become another hurdle for genuine claimants. 😤
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.