Bondi Attack Inquiry Urges National Gun Law Consistency in Australia

A royal commission into antisemitism after the Bondi terror attack has called for nationally consistent gun laws. The inquiry, established by PM Anthony Albanese, made 14 recommendations including a gun buyback scheme. Albanese has committed to adopting all federal recommendations and implementing reforms. The alleged gunman Naveed Akram has been charged with murder and terrorism offenses.

Key Points: Bondi Attack Inquiry: National Gun Law Consistency Urged

  • Inquiry recommends national consistency in gun laws
  • Gun buyback scheme proposed to remove illegal firearms
  • PM Albanese commits to adopting federal recommendations
  • Alleged gunman Naveed Akram charged with murder and terrorism
2 min read

Bondi terror attack inquiry calls for nationally consistent approach to Australian gun laws

Royal commission calls for consistent Australian gun laws after Bondi terror attack; PM Albanese adopts recommendations.

"We're not sitting back and just reading this document. We're acting on it. - Anthony Albanese"

Canberra, April 30

A landmark antisemitism inquiry established in the wake of the fatal terror attack at Sydney's Bondi Beach has called for all levels of government in Australia to prioritize a consistent national approach to gun laws.

In an interim report released on Thursday, the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion made 14 recommendations, five of which were not released publicly for national security reasons.

It said that federal, state and territory governments should prioritize efforts to implement consistent firearms laws and a gun buyback scheme to remove surplus and illegal guns from the community.

The inquiry was established by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in January after 15 people were killed in a fatal mass shooting that targeted a Hanukkah event at Bondi Beach on December 14, 2025.

The interim report handed down by Commissioner Virginia Bell said that the prime minister, state and territory leaders and national security committee members should participate in counter-terrorism exercises within nine months of each federal election and that a review of counter-terrorism police should be commissioned.

Additionally, it said that the police force in the state of New South Wales should increase security at Jewish festivals and events.

Albanese told reporters that all the recommendations relevant to the federal government would be adopted and implemented.

"We're not sitting back and just reading this document. We're acting on it," he said.

In the wake of the attack, Albanese committed to gun ownership reforms that would limit the number of firearms that can be legally owned by an individual and further restrict the type of guns that are legal.

He also announced plans for a national gun buyback scheme, under which Australians could hand in surplus and newly-restricted firearms, and called for the states and territories to agree to new reforms no later than March, Xinhua news agency reported.

As of the end of March, only four of the eight states and territories had signed up to the buyback scheme.

Alleged gunman Naveed Akram has been charged with murder and terrorism offenses over the attack, which authorities claim was motivated by Islamic State ideology. His father and fellow alleged perpetrator, Sajid Akram, was shot dead at the scene.

The royal commission will not examine the intention and motivation behind the attack to avoid influencing criminal proceedings.

It will hand down its final report by the first anniversary of the attack.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is a wake-up call for the Western world! In India, we've always believed that stricter regulations on weapons save lives. The fact that only 4 states agreed to the buyback scheme shows political differences putting lives at risk. Hope the Royal Commission's report leads to concrete action.
V
Vikram M
Antisemitism and terrorism are global issues. India has faced similar challenges in Kashmir and with radical elements. It's good to see Australia taking a firm stand. But I wonder why the inquiry isn't looking at the ideological motivation behind the attack - that's crucial for prevention. 🤔
S
Sarah B
As an Australian living in India, I can see both sides. The Port Arthur lessons are clear, but we need to respect state rights too. That said, when terrorists exploit loopholes, we must act. The buyback scheme is essential - hopefully the remaining states will join before more lives are lost.
K
Kavya N
Why are we not investigating the ideological roots? Islamic State ideology is a known threat. India has dealt with this for years - we need intelligence sharing and community outreach, not just stricter laws. The buyback is good, but addressing radicalization is equally important. 🎯
M
Michael C
I respect India's gun control achievements since the 90s. But we also need to consider that law-abiding citizens shouldn't be penalized for criminals' actions. A balanced approach with proper background checks, mental health screenings, and community policing would be better than blanket bans. Just saying.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50