South Korea's Central Bank Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $60T Error

The Bank of Korea has called for cryptocurrency exchanges to implement circuit breaker mechanisms following a massive error at Bithumb. An employee mistake led to the accidental distribution of bitcoins worth 60 trillion won instead of 460 dollars during a customer event. This triggered panic selling, forced liquidations, and highlighted weak internal controls in the crypto industry compared to traditional finance. The central bank recommends automated systems to verify transactions and halt trading during abnormal events.

Key Points: BOK Calls for Crypto Exchange Circuit Breakers After $60T Error

  • $60 trillion erroneous bitcoin distribution
  • Bithumb employee input error caused panic selling
  • BOK cites weak crypto industry controls
  • Proposal for KRX-style circuit breakers
  • Need for real-time IT verification systems
2 min read

BOK calls for introduction of circuit breakers for crypto exchanges

Bank of Korea cites Bithumb's 60 trillion won mistake, urges crypto exchanges to adopt safeguards like stock market circuit breakers.

"The primary cause was the lack of internal control systems designed to prevent such operational risks. - Bank of Korea"

Seoul, April 13

The central bank on Monday called for the introduction of mechanisms similar to the bourse operator's circuit breakers for cryptocurrency exchanges, citing the absence of such systems as a key factor behind a recent erroneous payment incident.

In February, Bithumb attempted to distribute bitcoin worth about 620,000 won (US$460) as prizes for a customer event, but accidentally ended up distributing 620,000 bitcoins worth about 60 trillion won due to an employee input error, reports Yonhap news agency.

Immediately after the incident, some users sold off the wrongly credited bitcoins in large volumes, causing bitcoin prices on Bithumb to plunge temporarily. Other users suffered losses due to panic selling and automatic sell orders, while some bitcoin-backed loans were forcibly liquidated.

"The primary cause was the lack of internal control systems designed to prevent such operational risks," the Bank of Korea (BOK) said in its annual payment and settlement report. "Compared to traditional financial institutions, the crypto asset industry has weaker internal controls and lower regulatory standards."

At the time of the incident, Bithumb allowed staff to distribute bitcoin without approval from supervisors or verification by internal monitoring departments.

Delays in recognising the incident and responding to it were also cited as factors that worsened the damage, as the exchange's fraud detection system failed to function properly, the BOK said.

To address the issue, the central bank said it is necessary to consider introducing system-level safeguards similar to the Korea Exchange (KRX)'s circuit breakers, which can halt trading in the event of abnormal transactions, such as large-volume orders or sharp price fluctuations.

"There is a need for IT systems that can automatically and in real time verify whether internal ledgers match blockchain balances, and prevent erroneous payments caused by human error," the BOK said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who lost money in a similar panic sell on an Indian exchange last year, I fully support circuit breakers. It protects retail investors from these wild swings caused by technical glitches or human error.
P
Priya S
"Weaker internal controls" is putting it mildly. Many of these platforms feel like they're run from a garage. If crypto wants to be taken seriously as an asset class, it needs the same rigor as banking. RBI has been right to flag these risks.
R
Rohit P
Imagine getting 620,000 bitcoins by mistake! But seriously, the users who sold them knowing it was an error... that's unethical. In India, we'd call that 'daal mein kuch kaala hai'. The system needs safeguards against exploitation too.
V
Vikram M
While circuit breakers are a good idea, let's not over-regulate and kill innovation. The Indian crypto scene is still young. We need balanced rules that protect users but also allow the industry to grow. A complete ban isn't the answer.
K
Karthik V
No supervisor approval for distributing Bitcoin? That's basic operational risk management 101. This incident shows why financial literacy is so important. People put their hard-earned money into these platforms without understanding the risks.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50