BJP's Tejasvi Surya Slams Opposition on Delimitation, Seeks More Parliament Sittings

BJP MP Tejasvi Surya strongly defended the proposed Delimitation Bill, labeling opposition to it as "vacuous and baseless." He accused parties like the Samajwadi Party and RJD of historically obstructing the Women's Reservation Bill and now creating new pretexts to delay its implementation. Surya assured that the delimitation exercise does no injustice to South Indian or smaller states, citing his own constituency. He also urged the government to increase the number of Lok Sabha sittings proportionally with the proposed increase in seats to 850.

Key Points: Tejasvi Surya Defends Delimitation Bill, Hits Out at Opposition

  • Surya dismisses delimitation opposition as baseless
  • Accuses SP, RJD of past Women's Bill obstruction
  • Assures South India faces no injustice
  • Urges increase in Lok Sabha sittings
  • Calls delimitation a constitutional mandate
3 min read

BJP MP Tejasvi Surya calls opposition to delimitation 'vacuous'; urges to increase Lok Sabha sittings

BJP MP Tejasvi Surya calls opposition to delimitation "vacuous," defends bill, and urges for more Lok Sabha sittings as seats increase to 850.

"Women who have been waiting for 40 years... will finally get their share. - Tejasvi Surya"

New Delhi, April 16

Bharatiya Janata Party MP Tejasvi Surya said on Thursday that the opposition to the Delimitation Bill is "vacuous and baseless". He also urged the Union government to increase the sittings of the Lok Sabha given that the Centre has now proposed to increase the total number of seats in the lower House.

Previously, Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal introduced the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirty-First Amendment) Bill and the Delimitation Bill 2026 in the Lok Sabha, while Union Home Minister Amit Shah proposed to introduce the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026.

Addressing the House, Surya said, "Women who have been waiting for 40 years to participate in the national policy making process will finally get their share."

Expressing his gratitude to Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the introduction of the three Bills, the BJP MP accused the Opposition of delaying the Women's Reservation Bill several times.

Particularly targeting the Samajwadi Party and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), Surya said, "When the Bill was introduced in the previous government's tenure, leaders from the Samajwadi Party and RJD tore the Bill in the House and had said that 'the Bill will only pass over my dead body'. The country remembers this kind of emphatic Opposition that they gave to the Women's Reservation Bill at that time."

The BJP MP accused the Opposition of coming up with a new "pretext" to oppose the application of the Women's Reservation Bill.

"The new pretext that they (Opposition parties) have come up with is this vacuous and baseless opposition to the delimitation exercise."

Surya said, "When the 'Nari Shakti Adhiniyam' was unanimously passed in 2023, all parties agreed that the Women's Reservation Bill will be applicable after the Census and the Delimitation exercise."

The BJP MP also accused the Opposition of taking a "U-turn".

"They (opposition parties) are now opposing the fast tracking of the Bill in the 2029 general elections and saying we want to oppose this because we don't want the Delimitation exercise to take place," he said.

About the Opposition's concern that the proposed Delimitation Bill will harm the South Indian and smaller states, Surya noted, "It is a systematic misleading and propaganda by certain members of the Opposition in the most irresponsible, anarchic fashion to mislead people in South India."

Citing his Lok Sabha constituency of Bengaluru South, the BJP MP asserted, "Even if there was an ounce of injustice to South India in the proposals that the Union government has made, I would have been the first to oppose."

Assuring South India and the smaller states, Surya said, "We could not have got a better deal than this."

Replying to Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi's charge that the Delimitation Bill is being brought through the backdoor, the BJP MP said, "The delimitation is not a backdoor exercise but a constitutional mandate of Article 81 and 82."

Defending the proposed Delimitation Bill, Surya noted, "There are certain constituencies in the country where a single MP is representing close to 38 lakh people, which is around the population of a small nation in Europe. How is this democratic and accountable governance?"

He highlighted that delimitation is not a mere democratic imperative but "it is also a constitutional duty".

Surya urged that since it has been proposed to increase the number of Lok Sabha seats to 850, "the number of sittings of the House should also be increased to at least half times more to what we are now doing."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I support more seats for better representation, I'm concerned about the timing and the rush. Why bundle this with the Women's Reservation Bill? It feels like political maneuvering. The promise of 33% seats for women has been pending for decades, and now it's getting linked to another contentious issue. Can we please have one transparent, clean process? 🤔
R
Rohit P
As someone from Karnataka, I appreciate Surya speaking up for South India. But his assurance isn't enough. We need to see the actual data and formula. Southern states have controlled population growth effectively and might get penalized. The central government must ensure no state loses its current number of seats. That's the only fair way.
S
Sarah B
Increasing Lok Sabha sittings is the most practical suggestion here! MPs should work more days, not just during sessions. We pay their salaries, they should be accountable and visible. If the number of MPs is going up, the house must function more. Good point by the MP. Hope the government acts on this.
K
Karthik V
The opposition's hypocrisy is showing. They tore the Women's Reservation Bill earlier, and now they pretend to care about it? Surya has a valid point. Delimitation is needed, and women's reservation should be implemented without further delay. The country has waited too long for both these reforms. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
N
Nisha Z
I have mixed feelings. More MPs could mean more corruption and more expenditure for the taxpayer. Where is the guarantee of better governance? First, improve the quality of debates and law

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50