MP High Court to Visit Disputed Bhojshala Site Before Crucial April 2 Hearing

The Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court has proposed a site visit to the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex before the next hearing on April 2. The court allowed parties to submit objections or suggestions regarding the Archaeological Survey of India's report. Advocate Shreesh Dubey stated the court granted additional time for filing suggestions and confirmed the site visit would occur without petitioners or lawyers present. The complex in Dhar district is claimed by Hindus as a Saraswati temple and by Muslims as the Kamal Maula mosque, with a 2003 arrangement allowing worship on specific days.

Key Points: MP High Court to Visit Bhojshala Site Before Next Hearing

  • Court proposes site inspection
  • Next hearing scheduled for April 2
  • Parties can file ASI report objections
  • Complex is a Hindu-Muslim disputed site
3 min read

Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Complex issue: MP High Court proposes to visit site before next hearing

Madhya Pradesh High Court proposes site visit in Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex case, schedules next hearing for April 2.

"The Court proposes to visit the site before the next date of hearing. - Court Order"

Indore, March 17

Indore Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court held a hearing in the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Complex issue and proposed that the court would visit the site before the next hearing is held on the matter.

During the hearing on Monday, the division bench of Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla and Justice Alok Awasthi further directed that if any party is yet to file its objection or suggestion related to the report of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), then it may submit before the next hearing, which is scheduled for April 2.

"Considering the nature of the petition and that the petition is a public interest litigation, applications for intervention are allowed to the extent that the intervenor would be given right to the audience only at the time of hearing and may file documents in support of the submissions on affidavit, which are proposed to be raised," the Court said.

"Parties may submit their respective objections/opinion/suggestions or recommendations in respect of the report of the Archaeological Survey of India before the next date, if not already filed, in terms of the directions contained in para 9(ii) and (iii) of the order dated 22.01.2026. The Court proposes to visit the site before the next date of hearing," the order read.

Meanwhile, Bhoj Utsav Samiti Advocate Shreesh Dubey said that sought additional time from the court to file their suggestion, which the court granted and instructed to file it before the next hearing.

"During the previous hearing, the court gave three weeks time to the parties to submit their suggestions or objections. Most of the suggestions and objections from the parties have now been received. Though, we had sought additional time from the court to submit our suggestions, which the court accepted and directed that to be submitted before the next hearing. The next date of hearing in the matter has been scheduled for April 2," Dubey told ANI.

The advocate further said that the court would visit the Bhojshala site without the presence of the petitioners, lawyers, or any respondents related to the matter before the next hearing.

"During the proceedings, the court also stated that it would conduct a site visit to the Bhojshala premises without the presence of the petitioners, lawyers, or respondents of the case. The next hearing will take place on April 2, and any suggestions or objections can be submitted in between before the next hearing," he added.

There is a disputed site, the Bhojshala complex, situated in Madhya Pradesh's Dhar district. For Hindus, the Bhoj Shala complex is a temple dedicated to Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati), while for Muslims, it is the site of the Kamal Maula mosque.

According to an arrangement in 2003, Hindus perform puja at the complex on Tuesdays from sunrise to sunset, while Muslims offer namaz on Fridays from 1 pm to 3 pm.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The 2003 arrangement has worked for over 20 years. Why disturb the peace now? Sometimes these legal battles create more tension than they resolve. The court visit is okay, but I hope they consider the importance of maintaining communal harmony above all else.
R
Rohit P
Finally! The ASI report must have revealed something significant. The court visiting the site without any parties present is crucial—it prevents any side from influencing the judges' initial impression. Truth and history should guide the verdict, not politics.
A
Anjali F
As a student of history, I appreciate the court's methodical approach. Allowing more time for submissions and then a physical verification shows they are treating this with the gravity it deserves. The ASI's archaeological findings should be the primary evidence here.
M
Michael C
Watching from abroad, it's interesting to see the Indian judiciary handle such sensitive matters. The site visit is a good procedural move. Hope the resolution respects both the historical facts and the current religious practices of the communities involved.
K
Karthik V
The court's decision to visit is praiseworthy, but the entire process feels painfully slow. These disputes drain public resources and energy. We need a clear legal framework to handle such heritage sites once and for all. Jai Hind.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50