Calcutta HC Seeks 200 Judicial Officers from Odisha, Jharkhand for Bengal Voter Roll Revision

The Calcutta High Court has sought 200 judicial officers from the High Courts of Odisha and Jharkhand to join the adjudication process for voter documents in West Bengal. This decision follows a Supreme Court order permitting such deputation to expedite the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. The move aims to accelerate the resolution of cases categorized under "logical discrepancy" in the poll-bound state. Daily progress reports are being submitted to the High Court to ensure the timely completion of this critical electoral exercise.

Key Points: Calcutta HC Seeks 200 Judicial Officers for Bengal Voter Roll Revision

  • Expediting voter roll adjudication
  • Seeking officers from neighboring states
  • Supreme Court approval for deputation
  • Handling 'logical discrepancy' cases
2 min read

Bengal SIR process: Calcutta HC seeks 200 judicial officers from Odisha, Jharkhand

Calcutta High Court requests 200 judicial officers from Odisha & Jharkhand to expedite adjudication of voter roll discrepancies in poll-bound West Bengal.

"The final number of 'logical discrepancy' cases... would be treated as the final figure for adjudication purposes. - Calcutta High Court Meeting"

Kolkata, Feb 26

The Calcutta High Court, on Thursday, sought 200 judicial officers -- 100 each from the High Courts of Odisha and Jharkhand -- to join the team of judicial officers already appointed for adjudication of voters' documents identified under the "logical discrepancy" category.

The decision to seek these 200 judicial officers from the neighbouring states was taken at a high-level meeting chaired by Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Sujoy Paul.

The meeting was attended by Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, Manoj Kumar Agarwal; West Bengal Chief Secretary Nandini Chakraborty; Acting Director General of Police Peeyush Pandey; Kolkata Police Commissioner Supratim Sarkar; and Special Roll Observer for West Bengal Subrata Gupta.

It may be recalled that a division bench of the Supreme Court, on February 24, permitted judicial officers from the neighbouring High Courts of Jharkhand and Odisha to be deputed to West Bengal to expedite the adjudication of voter claims and objections arising from the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the poll-bound state.

At the meeting held on Wednesday under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice, it was decided that the final number of "logical discrepancy" cases, as determined at midnight on February 21, would be treated as the final figure for adjudication purposes.

Already, 532 judicial officers from different courts in West Bengal have been appointed for adjudication of voters' documents, and out of them, 273 judicial officers are currently engaged in the adjudication process.

With the addition of 200 more judicial officers from the High Courts of Odisha and Jharkhand, the adjudication process relating to voters' documents is expected to gain further momentum.

The final voters' list in West Bengal, excluding those "logical discrepancy" cases that have been referred for judicial adjudication, will be published, while supplementary lists will be issued in due course depending on the progress of the adjudication process.

The judicial officers are submitting daily reports on the progress of adjudication work to the Calcutta High Court to ensure timely completion of the process.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Good move by the Calcutta HC. With elections coming up, we need to clear all doubts about the voter list. Hope this speeds up the process and we get a clean, final list soon. No room for error in something this important.
A
Aman W
While the intent is good, I have a respectful criticism. Why were so many "logical discrepancies" found in the first place? This points to a failure in the initial process of voter registration and list preparation. We need to fix the root cause, not just the symptoms.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see inter-state cooperation like this. It shows the judiciary is taking its role in the electoral process seriously. Daily reporting to the HC is a good accountability measure.
V
Vikram M
Finally some action! The SIR process was moving too slowly. Adding 200 officers from Odisha and Jharkhand should clear the backlog. Every citizen's right to vote must be protected, and this is a step in the right direction. Jai Hind!
N
Nisha Z
As a Bengali, I appreciate the Supreme Court's intervention. We need a free and fair election. Bringing in outside officers removes any potential for local bias or pressure. Hope the supplementary lists are published without delay.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50