Bengal Govt Defends Protocol in President Murmu Visit, Sparks MHA Row

The West Bengal government has submitted its detailed reply to the Union Home Ministry regarding clarifications sought on alleged protocol violations during President Droupadi Murmu's visit to the state. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had preemptively defended the state's actions, stating there was no breach as the district administration was present to receive the President. The controversy stemmed from President Murmu's expressed dissatisfaction, particularly over a last-minute venue change and the absence of the Chief Minister or cabinet colleagues during her visit. This incident triggered a political clash between BJP leaders and the state's ruling administration.

Key Points: Bengal Govt Replies to MHA on Protocol in President Murmu's Visit

  • MHA sought report on protocol violations
  • State sent detailed point-by-point reply
  • President expressed dissatisfaction over venue change
  • War of words erupted between BJP and CM
3 min read

Bengal govt replies to MHA's note on protocol violations during Prez Murmu's visit

West Bengal sends point-by-point clarifications to MHA on alleged protocol violations during President Droupadi Murmu's visit to the state.

"There was no protocol violation. There was no plan for me as the Chief Minister to welcome her... - Mamata Banerjee"

Kolkata, March 9

The West Bengal government had replied to the clarifications sought by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs regarding protocol violations during President Droupadi Murmu's visit to the state on Saturday.

The MHA had sought the report from the office of the Chief Secretary, Nandini Chakraborty, on Sunday morning, fixing 5 P.M. of the same day as the deadline for replying to the query.

Although an insider from the state secretariat confirmed that a detailed reply on the clarification sought by the MHA had been sent he refused to spell out the detailed contents of the report and remained limited to stating that point-by-point clarifications were given on the points of protocol violations raised by the MHA.

In fact, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, on Sunday, had given some indications on what would be the clarifications on protocol violations that the state government led by her would give to the MHA.

"After the President landed at Bagdogra Airport near Siliguri on Monday, the Siliguri Municipal Corporation Mayor, Goutam Deb, the District Magistrate of Darjeeling, and the Commissioner of Siliguri Metropolitan Police (SMC) were present at the airport to receive her as per the protocol. There was no protocol violation. There was no plan for me as the Chief Minister to welcome her or be on stage at the event. Since the district administration was present there, there was no question of breach of protocol," the Chief Minister said on Sunday evening.

The President was supposed to arrive in North Bengal on Friday afternoon. The visit was postponed due to some unavoidable reasons.

The President landed at Bagdogra airport at 11:30 AM on Saturday. She was supposed to attend a function of the tribal community in the Phansidewa area near Siliguri in Darjeeling district, but the venue was later changed to Gossaipur.

Following the venue change controversy, the President expressed her dissatisfaction. Later, she went to Phansidewa, where the event was supposed to be held originally. From there, President Murmu resorted to mild criticism of the state administration, while maintaining that Mamata Banerjee was like her younger sister.

The President also pointed out that neither the Chief Minister nor any of her Cabinet colleagues met her during her visit to the state, which was against established traditions and protocols whenever the President visits a place.

Following her statements, a war of words broke out between BJP leaders and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, and finally, on Sunday morning, the MHA sought clarifications from the state government on the protocol violations.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
Why is everything turned into a political fight? The CM said the district administration was present as per protocol. The President's schedule was changed last minute. Both sides should show more grace. This constant bickering between Centre and state helps no one.
A
Aman W
The real issue is the venue change for the tribal community event. Phansidewa to Gossaipur? That must have caused so much inconvenience to the local people who were waiting. That's where the focus should be, not just on who met whom.
S
Sarah B
Reading this from abroad. It's fascinating and a bit confusing. The President calling the CM her "younger sister" but then pointing out protocol lapses. The personal and political seem very intertwined here. Hope the state's reply clarifies things properly.
K
Karthik V
MHA giving a deadline of 5 PM on the same day for a reply? That seems unnecessarily rushed. How can any administration prepare a detailed, point-by-point clarification under such pressure? This looks more like creating a controversy than seeking genuine answers.
M
Meera T
Regardless of politics, we must respect the office of the President. If the established tradition is for the CM to receive the President, it should have been followed. This sets a bad precedent for federal relations. Hope both sides learn from this.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50