NewKerala.com

China Slams US Tibet Envoy as "Illegitimate Interference" in Internal Affairs

China has strongly criticized the United States for appointing a new Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues, calling the position a tool for illegitimate interference in its internal affairs. The US role, established by law in 2002, is tasked with promoting Tibetan human rights, religious freedom, and cultural preservation. Beijing's Foreign Ministry reiterated that Tibet-related matters are solely China's sovereign concern and not open to external intervention. The appointment underscores the ongoing diplomatic friction between the two nations over the Tibet issue.

Key Points: China Rejects US Tibet Coordinator, Calls It Interference

  • US appoints new Tibet issues coordinator
  • China calls appointment illegitimate interference
  • Role created under 2002 US law
  • Mandate includes human rights and dialogue
  • Beijing asserts Tibet is internal matter
3 min read

Beijing pushes back against US Tibet appointment, denies legitimacy of human rights role

Beijing condemns US appointment of a Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues, denouncing it as illegitimate interference in China's internal affairs.

"so-called 'special coordinator for Tibetan issues' as a mechanism of interference - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs"

Beijing, February 23

China on Wednesday sharply criticised the United States after Washington announced the appointment of a new United States Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues, accusing the US of interfering in what it described as China's internal matters, according to a report by Phayul.

As cited by Phayul, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday designated Riley M Barnes, currently serving as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour, as the new US Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues. The role, established under American law, is tasked with overseeing and aligning US initiatives aimed at promoting and safeguarding the human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, and linguistic heritage of the Tibetan people.

The announcement was made in a statement issued on the occasion of Losar, the Tibetan New Year. In his message, Rubio extended greetings to Tibetans worldwide, acknowledging their resilience and reaffirming Washington's commitment to protecting their fundamental rights and preserving their distinct traditions and heritage.

"I extend my warmest wishes to all those celebrating Losar, the Tibetan New Year. On this first day of the Year of the Fire Horse, we celebrate the fortitude and resilience of Tibetans around the world. The United States remains committed to supporting the unalienable rights of Tibetans and their distinct linguistic, cultural, and religious heritage. I wish Tibetans everywhere a healthy and prosperous year ahead. Losar Tashi Delek and Happy New Year!" the statement read.

Rubio further stated that he was pleased to designate Assistant Secretary Barnes to concurrently serve as the Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues.

Beijing responded with strong objections. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as noted in the Phayul report, accused Washington of exploiting Tibet-related matters to interfere in China's domestic affairs. In an official statement, the ministry described the "so-called 'special coordinator for Tibetan issues'" as a mechanism of interference and reiterated that China has never recognised the legitimacy of the position.

The Chinese government maintained that issues concerning Tibet fall strictly within its sovereign domain and do not permit intervention by external forces, repeating its longstanding stance that Tibet-related affairs are purely internal matters.

The position of US Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues was formally created under the Tibetan Policy Act of 2002, enacted as part of the Foreign Relations Authorisation Act for Fiscal Year 2003 and signed into law in 2002. The legislation marked the first time US policy toward Tibet was codified in statute and required the Secretary of State to appoint a Special Coordinator within the State Department.

Under the law, the Special Coordinator is mandated to encourage meaningful dialogue between Chinese authorities and the Dalai Lama or his representatives, advance and protect the human rights and religious freedoms of Tibetans, support the preservation of Tibetan language and culture, facilitate humanitarian assistance for Tibetan refugees in South Asia, and ensure interagency coordination of US policy on Tibet.

Since the law's enactment, successive US administrations have appointed senior State Department officials to hold the position alongside other high-level responsibilities. The Special Coordinator does not serve as a diplomatic representative to Beijing but functions as a policy lead within the US government, underscoring Washington's continued engagement on Tibet-related human rights and dialogue initiatives. (ANI)

While Beijing has consistently rejected the role of illegitimate interference, the position remains a statutory requirement under US law, reflecting enduring bipartisan congressional backing for Tibet-related issues since the early 2000s, Phayul reported.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the US making this move on Losar. While human rights are important, every country has a right to its territorial integrity. The timing feels more symbolic than substantive.
V
Vikram M
As an Indian, our primary concern should be our border. However, we cannot ignore the principle of self-determination. The preservation of Tibetan culture and language is a genuine issue, but the solution must come from within, not through external pressure.
P
Priya S
The US has a history of using such positions to further its geopolitical interests. Where was this coordinator when human rights were being violated elsewhere? It feels selective. India must navigate this carefully, maintaining its own strategic autonomy.
R
Rohit P
China's reaction is predictable. But honestly, the US law from 2002 hasn't changed much on the ground, has it? It's more about political posturing. We have Tibetan communities in India; our focus should be on supporting them culturally and socially, not getting into this diplomatic tug-of-war.
K
Karthik V
While I respect China's stance on sovereignty, a respectful criticism: complete dismissal of any dialogue on cultural preservation isn't helpful. The world is interconnected. Perhaps a less confrontational approach from both sides could yield better results for the Tibetan people's heritage.
M
Michael C

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50