Parliamentary Panel Backs Pen-and-Paper Exams Amid NEET Leak Controversy

A Parliamentary Standing Committee backed pen-and-paper entrance exams in a December report, citing leak-proof models like UPSC and CBSE. This recommendation has gained significance after NEET-UG 2026 was cancelled due to alleged paper leaks. The committee's stance contrasts with a high-level panel led by K Radhakrishnan that advocated for computer-based testing. The report also criticized NTA's performance, noting multiple exam issues in 2024.

Key Points: NEET-UG Leak: Panel Backs Pen-and-Paper Exams

  • NEET-UG 2026 cancelled amid paper leaks
  • Parliamentary panel backed pen-and-paper mode in December report
  • Panel cited leak-proof track record of UPSC, CBSE exams
  • Contrasts with K Radhakrishnan committee's push for computer-based testing
3 min read

Before NEET-UG leak, parliamentary panel backed pen-and-paper mode of entrance exams

A parliamentary committee supported pen-and-paper exams over computer-based testing, citing leak-proof models like UPSC, amid the NEET-UG cancellation.

"Between the two, the Committee supported a greater focus on pen-and-paper examinations given that there are several models of such examinations which have been leak-proof for several years. - Parliamentary Standing Committee report"

By Vishu Adhana, New Delhi, May 15

A Parliamentary Standing Committee backed the pen-and-paper mode of entrance examinations, citing the "leak-proof" track record of exams such as those conducted by the UPSC and CBSE.

In its report submitted in December, months before the cancellation of NEET-UG 2026 amid alleged paper leaks, the committee advised the NTA to "closely study these models and implement the same".

The recommendation has gained significance amid renewed debate over the mode of conducting high-stakes entrance tests, with several experts arguing that the pen-and-paper format of NEET-UG, conducted for over 22 lakh candidates in a single shift across thousands of centres, makes it more vulnerable to leaks.

The recommendation contrasts with the suggestions made by the high-level committee led by former ISRO Chairman K Radhakrishnan in 2024, which had made a strong case for shifting from pen-and-paper testing (PPT) to computer-based testing (CBT).

The expert committee had stated that there was a "strong case for the transition from PPT to CBT as the preferred methodology" and called for a robust CBT model with examinations conducted in multiple shifts as the "sure way forward".

However, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports, chaired by Digvijaya Singh, supported greater reliance on pen-and-paper examinations while acknowledging the trade-offs involved in both systems.

"The Committee was informed that, with regard to securing the examination process, the tradeoffs are as follows. Pen and paper exams offer more opportunities for paper leaks, while computer-based tests (CBT) can be hacked in a manner that is difficult to detect," the report stated.

"Between the two, the Committee supported a greater focus on pen-and-paper examinations given that there are several models of such examinations which have been leak-proof for several years -- including the CBSE exams and the UPSC exams," it added.

The panel also recommended that CBT examinations should be conducted only at government or government-controlled centres and "never in private centres".

In its report, the committee expressed sharp criticism of the NTA's functioning, stating that its performance "has not inspired much confidence".

It noted that in 2024 alone, at least five of the 14 competitive examinations conducted by the NTA faced major issues. According to the report, UGC-NET, CSIR-NET and NEET-PG had to be postponed, NEET-UG saw instances of paper leaks, while CUET-UG/PG results were delayed.

The panel also pointed to the withdrawal of at least 12 questions from the final answer key of JEE Main 2025 due to errors, observing that such incidents "do not inspire confidence of the examinees in the system".

"The Committee therefore recommends that NTA need to quickly get their act together so that such instances, which otherwise are fully avoidable, do not occur in future," the report stated.

The panel further recommended the creation of a nationwide blacklist of firms involved in paper-setting, administration and correction that have been barred by any state government or organisation, arguing that such entities should not be allowed to secure contracts elsewhere.

It also noted that the NTA generated a surplus corpus of around Rs 448 crore over the last six years and recommended that the amount be used to strengthen the agency's own examination and monitoring capabilities.

This is the first time since the National Testing Agency began conducting NEET in 2019 that the examination has been cancelled entirely.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Honestly, I'm not convinced. 22 lakh students in one shift is a logistical nightmare. Multiple shifts with CBT would be more secure. The Radhakrishnan committee made a strong case. We can't just copy UPSC model - NEET's scale is completely different. Time for NTA to modernize! 🎯
J
James A
Interesting that the parliamentary committee is backing pen-paper despite the NEET leak. From a Western perspective, computer-based testing with multiple shifts and question banks has proven very effective in the US (like the SAT, MCAT). India's massive scale requires robust digital infrastructure, but that investment seems worth it for exam integrity.
S
Siddharth J
The committee's logic is flawed. UPSC and CBSE exams don't have the same scale or stakes. Also, saying "CBT can be hacked" is true but so can paper leaks be. The real issue is NTA's incompetence. Rs 448 crore surplus but still can't conduct exams properly? Please 🙄
S
Sarah B
A sensible middle ground might be pen-paper for initial screening and CBT for later stages, as done in many countries. But the blacklist recommendation for errant firms is excellent - that's something we should adopt in Canada too. Accountability is key for any system to work. 🍁
K
Kavya N
The problem is not pen-paper vs computer. It's about transparency and accountability. UPSC manages papers safely because they have strict protocols. NTA is a mess - delaying results, posting wrong answer keys, cancelling exams mid-process. Send the money to

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50