NewKerala.com

RBI Deputy Governor: Banking Beyond Numbers and Regulations

RBI Deputy Governor Swaminathan J emphasized that banking must be understood through experience and judgment, not just numbers and regulations. He highlighted that credit decisions involve uncertainty about the future and require informed judgment beyond theoretical models. The deputy governor stressed that regulators must look beyond compliance to assess underlying risks and ensure financial stability as a public good. He concluded that technology alone cannot address key banking challenges, which require institutional discipline and a sense of public purpose.

Key Points: Banking Needs Judgment, Not Just Models: RBI Dy Governor

  • Banking requires judgment beyond models
  • Credit decisions are inherently uncertain
  • Supervision differs from compliance
  • Financial stability is a public good
  • Technology alone cannot answer key banking questions
2 min read

Banking cannot be understood only through numbers, models or regulations: RBI Dy Governor

RBI Deputy Governor Swaminathan J says banking must go beyond numbers and regulations, emphasizing judgment, experience, and public purpose in financial decisions.

"Credit is a judgment about the future. Will this borrower repay? Will this business generate the cash flows it has projected? - Swaminathan J"

New Delhi, May 4

Reserve Bank of India Deputy Governor Swaminathan J on Monday highlighted that banking must be understood beyond numbers, models and regulations, emphasising the role of judgment, experience and public purpose in financial decision-making.

Delivering the G Ramachandran Memorial Lecture at Madras School of Economics, he said, "Banking cannot be understood only through numbers, models or regulations, though all three are important. It must also be understood through experience, institutional behaviour and the public purpose that finance is meant to serve."

Drawing from his banking career, he highlighted that credit decisions are inherently uncertain and require informed judgment. "Credit is a judgment about the future. Will this borrower repay? Will this business generate the cash flows it has projected?" he said, underlining that such decisions go beyond theoretical models.

He further noted that banking institutions operate on trust and multiple commitments, including safeguarding depositors' money and ensuring fair access to credit, while also supporting broader developmental objectives.

Emphasising the role of supervision, he said regulators must look beyond formal compliance to assess underlying risks. "Compliance asks whether the rule has been followed. Supervision asks whether the underlying risk has been understood and addressed," he stated.

He also highlighted the importance of financial stability as a public good, noting that its value often lies in prevention rather than visible outcomes.

Swaminathan J stressed the need to combine theoretical knowledge with real-world exposure. He said institutions and firms cannot be understood only through reported numbers, as these may not fully reflect underlying risks, governance quality or operational realities.

He further pointed to the evolving nature of banking, which is becoming more digital and data-driven, while cautioning that key challenges remain unchanged. "These questions cannot be answered by technology alone. They require judgment. They require institutional discipline. They require humility about what we do not know and above all, they require a sense of public purpose," he said.

He added, "Sound finance is therefore not only a matter of profitability, but also of responsibility," highlighting the broader impact of financial decisions on the economy and society.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Very insightful lecture. The distinction between compliance and supervision is crucial. Compliance is about ticking boxes, but supervision is about truly understanding risk. I've seen too many cases where banks followed all the rules technically but still failed because they didn't grasp the real risks. India's banking system needs more of this thinking.
R
Rohit P
Good points but let's be honest. The RBI itself has been obsessed with numbers and regulations for years. Remember the whole YES Bank fiasco? And PNB fraud? Where was this 'judgment' then? It's easy to give lectures, but implementation matters more. We need concrete action, not just philosophical speeches.
K
Kavya N
As someone who works in fintech, I appreciate this balanced view. Technology is transforming banking, but it can't replace human judgment entirely. The emphasis on 'public purpose' is especially relevant in India, where banks have to balance profit with social responsibility. It's a tough act but necessary.
A
Arjun K
Well said! The reference to 'humility about what we do not know' really resonated with me. In Indian banking, we often pretend we have all the answers. But the best bankers I've met are those who admit uncertainty and still make thoughtful decisions. This lecture should be mandatory reading for all bank managers.
N
Nikhil C
Important perspective but I wish the RBI would apply this to their own functioning. Their rigid NPA recognition norms and frequent policy flip-flops show they're as guilty of 'regulation for regulation's sake' as anyone. Let's see more

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50