Bangladesh Votes on Dual Ballots: Parliament and Historic July Charter Reforms

Bangladesh is holding a landmark general election where voters will cast two ballots: one to elect a new Parliament and another in a referendum on the "July Charter." The Charter is a comprehensive reform framework born from the 2024 political uprising, designed to institutionalize democratic governance, limit executive power, and overhaul electoral and judicial systems. If approved, the next Parliament must enact the required constitutional amendments within 270 days, or they will be automatically passed. This referendum presents a direct democratic mechanism to legitimize sweeping changes in a politically fractured climate.

Key Points: Bangladesh Election: Voters Cast Dual Ballots for Parliament & Charter

  • Dual ballots for Parliament & Charter referendum
  • Charter aims to limit authoritarian power
  • 84 reform proposals, half need constitutional change
  • Next Parliament to act as Constitutional Reform Council
4 min read

Bangladesh voters to cast two mandates, one to elect Parliament, another on July Charter

Bangladesh holds a pivotal election with a referendum on the July Charter, a reform package aiming to limit executive power and reshape governance.

"A referendum is both legally feasible and constitutionally desirable, offering a direct channel for the people to sanction reforms. - The Daily Star"

New Delhi, Feb 10

Bangladesh is set to hold one of the most consequential, yet contentious elections since its 1971 independence, with the 13th general election to be held on February 12, to select the next government, and a Prime Minister.

This time, voters will also receive two ballots: one to elect Members of Parliament and another for the referendum question on the "July Charter".

Citizens will vote "yes" or "no" on the implementation of the "July National Charter 2025", according to Dhaka Tribune.

The Charter is a political and constitutional reform framework designed to institutionalise democratic governance and limit authoritarian power after the 2024 uprising.

Its aims to institutionalise democratic reforms and prevent the concentration of executive power.

It also proposed granting protections to participants in the uprising, called "July Fighters"; reform governance, judiciary, and electoral systems, including restoring a neutral caretaker government for elections; strengthen fundamental rights and ensure inclusivity in national governance.

According to the government, 47 of the 84 proposals require constitutional amendments, while the remaining 37 will be implemented through laws or executive orders, reported Bangladesh's Business Standard.

"If 'Yes' wins, the Constitution Reform Council of the next Parliament must complete the required constitutional amendments within 270 days, or nine months," it added.

In case the Council fails to do so in this period, a Constitution Amendment Bill from the interim government will automatically be considered passed.

The Charter is a draft of reforms packaged in the aftermath of political uprising that ousted the Shiekh Hasina-led Awami League government in August 2024, which was acknowledged by most political parties last year.

Among changes proposed include a term limit for Prime Ministers, introducing bicameral Legislature, providing stronger judicial independence, increasing powers for bodies involved in election oversight, among others.

If approved, the next Parliament will also serve as a Constitutional Reform Council tasked with enacting the approved constitutional amendments within 270 days, reported the Bengali daily Prothom Alo.

Approval ensures automatic enactment if the Council fails to complete reforms in time, it said.

Incidentally, this will be the third time in Bangladesh that a charter of reforms has been presented, reports added.

Earlier, the first one was presented after President Hussain Muhammad Ershad's exit from power seized power through a bloodless coup by overthrowing President Abdus Sattar of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) in 1990, the second in 2007 during the caretaker rule after the end of Khaleda Zia's term as the Prime Minister.

According to a Daily Star report, there are 84 reform proposals now, half requiring constitutional amendments.

It said that the "Charter has ignited a national debate about the very mechanisms of popular sovereignty. Central to this discourse is the vital question: should Bangladesh hold a referendum to ratify these monumental changes?"

"The argument that a referendum is both legally feasible and constitutionally desirable offers a rare, momentous opportunity to re-anchor the state's legitimacy in the direct will of the people, invoking the foundational principles of constitutionalism and democratic theory," it opined.

Given the fractured political climate, it said that a referendum may be both legally feasible and constitutionally desirable, offering a direct channel for the people to sanction reforms and thereby immunise them against partisan contestation.

"A principal critique is that the Constitution of Bangladesh does not explicitly provide for referenda. Yet, critically, it does not prohibit them either. This silence is a space for constitutional imagination," the report opined.

With Parliament dissolved and the interim authority constrained by Supreme Court rulings against the doctrine of necessity, traditional legal pathways for reform are unavailable.

A referendum thus emerges as the only legitimate mechanism to anchor the new constitutional order in the sovereign will of the people, it said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an observer, the automatic enactment clause if the Council fails is crucial. It prevents future governments from stalling reforms. Bangladesh's political journey is complex, but this seems like a genuine attempt at a reset. The success of this will have implications for democratic movements everywhere.
V
Vikram M
Direct public mandate on constitutional changes is a powerful idea. In India, we've seen how difficult major constitutional amendments can be. If this works, it could be a model for other democracies facing political gridlock. However, the execution will be everything. Wishing our Bangladeshi brothers and sisters a peaceful process.
P
Priya S
The focus on a neutral caretaker government for elections is the most important point. So much political violence in the past has stemmed from disputed elections. If this charter can ensure free and fair polls, it will be a massive achievement. Stability in Bangladesh is good for the entire subcontinent's economy.
R
Rohit P
While the intent seems noble, I have a respectful criticism. Packaging 84 reforms together and asking for a simple yes/no vote is problematic. Do voters really understand each proposal? Some might support term limits but oppose bicameral legislature. A more granular approach might have been better for such monumental changes.
M
Michael C
The report's point about "constitutional imagination" is key. Sometimes, strict adherence to old procedures can stifle necessary change. When traditional pathways are blocked, as they seem to be, a referendum is a logical, democratic tool. Hope the vote is conducted transparently.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50