Balochistan's Long Simmer: How Pakistan's Militarization Fueled Enduring Insurgency

The recent violence in Balochistan is not a sudden outbreak but the result of long-simmering tensions over the Pakistani military's oppressive policies and human rights abuses. A critical analysis reveals the crisis reflects the structural weakness of the Pakistani state, where politics has been heavily militarized. Despite the region's strategic importance for projects like CPEC and its mineral wealth, the state fails to provide basic security, treating the local populace as an obstacle. The situation has worsened under current military leadership, with enforced disappearances and intimidation silencing dissent, leaving Balochistan a festering wound for Pakistan's future.

Key Points: Balochistan Insurgency: Roots in Pakistan Military Excesses

  • Insurgency roots in long-term oppression
  • Military excesses and human rights abuses
  • CPEC investments face security threats
  • State treats people as obstacles, not assets
3 min read

Balochistan's insurgency not sudden, tensions simmered for long over Pakistan military's excesses: Report

Report analyzes Balochistan's long-standing tensions, linking insurgency to Pakistan's militarized policies, human rights abuses, and CPEC security failures.

"Persistent attacks signal that militarisation has failed to create sustainable stability. - Eurasia Review Report"

New Delhi, Feb 15

The spate of violence and bloody confrontation between the Baloch insurgents and the Pakistani military in recent times has brought the region into the global spotlight, highlighting the scale and intensity of human rights abuses in the region, as the rebels, refusing to give in to the military's pressure and directives, have squared off against it often.

While Pakistan government sees a 'foreign hand' in inciting rebellion in the region, the locals blame it on the former's autocratic and oppressive policies for the hardened sentiments.

Breaking down the complex and intricate relationship between Pakistan government and Baloch residents, a critical analysis by a leading portal, Eurasia Review, finds that it is not just a regional crisis but reflects the structural weakness of the Pakistani state and also shows a mirror on the grave consequences when politics is "militarised" i.e. when military exceeds its mandate and pervades into the decision-making process.

Ironically, the vast swathes of barren land in Balochistan don't contribute substantially to Pakistan's economy, but this remains a "land of opportunity", and the Pakistani establishment also promotes it in the same way on the global stage.

Notably, Balochistan is at the heart of China's investments in Pakistan through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and also remains central to Islamabad's recent attempts to attract US capital into the mining sector.

"The province's vast reserves of copper, gold, coal, and gas have become central to Pakistan's economic recovery narrative. Yet the state struggles to guarantee even basic security for heavily guarded infrastructure projects. Persistent attacks signal that militarisation has failed to create sustainable stability," the report says.

Balochistan's geographical location is of immense significance as it controls Pakistan's access to the Arabian Sea, borders Iran and Afghanistan, and also serves as the indispensable land corridor linking China to the Indian Ocean.

Lately, the province has seen a spate of violence with people rising in revolt against the Pakistan government's oppression and its military's excesses.

Under Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir, recently elevated to the rank of Field Marshal, the military-citizen relations only went downhill, pushing the situation into strategic paralysis.

The report explains that no serious investment, either Chinese or Western, can thrive where geography is treated as a strategic asset but the people who inhabit it are treated as an obstacle.

Making matters worse, the Pakistani military has systematically downplayed its casualties in Balochistan since 2019, when the intensity of security operations increased markedly. Despite the public backlash, nothing has been done to address the long-standing issues of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and mass arrests of Baloch activists.

Islamabad has persistently maintained that Balochistan remains a security issue and never acknowledged the real crisis. When Baloch residents expressed dissent with marches to student protests, they were met with arrests, media blackouts, and intimidation.

The report concludes that Balochistan has remained a festering wound, not only for its people but also for Pakistan's future.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
It's heartbreaking to read about the enforced disappearances and media blackouts. As a neighbour, we see the human cost of this conflict. Pakistan's establishment is so busy securing CPEC for China that it has forgotten the people of Balochistan. Their suffering is immense. 🙏
R
Rahul R
The geographical significance of Balochistan is undeniable. But you cannot build an economic corridor on the graves of your own citizens. The report is correct—treating people as an obstacle is a recipe for perpetual instability. Pakistan's "security issue" narrative is a smokescreen.
S
Sarah B
While the analysis is sharp, I wish Indian media would also apply similar scrutiny to internal conflicts in our own region. It's easier to point fingers. That said, the plight of the Baloch is tragic and the world should take note of these human rights abuses.
A
Aman W
The part about the military downplaying casualties since 2019 is telling. When institutions are not accountable, this is what happens. Balochistan's resources are being exploited while its people are crushed. This is a stark lesson for any nation.
K
Kavya N
"Festering wound" is the perfect term. Pakistan's military-first approach has failed. You can't have stability without justice. My heart goes out to the Baloch students and activists facing arrests for just demanding their rights. Strength to them. ✊

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50