UN Chief Guterres Calls for Asia's Greater Role in Reformed Security Council

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has stated that Asia is underrepresented among the Security Council's permanent members and this imbalance needs correction. He criticized countries blocking the reform process, noting they are often the same ones criticizing the UN's effectiveness. Guterres expressed support for proposals to restrict the veto power of permanent members in cases of genocide or crimes against humanity. He also emphasized that the Security Council alone holds the legally binding authority on international peace and security issues.

Key Points: UNSC Reform: Guterres Says Asia Underrepresented, Backs India

  • Asia underrepresented in UNSC permanent seats
  • Reform blocked by small group of nations
  • Supports limits on veto for genocide cases
  • Only Security Council has binding authority on peace
3 min read

Asia underrepresented among UNSC permanent membership; should be rectified, says Guterres

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres advocates for UN Security Council reform, stating Asia is underrepresented and supports limits on veto power.

"I think that probably Asia is underrepresented, also clearly, and so this rebalancing needs to be done - Antonio Guterres"

United Nations, Jan 30

Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has said that Asia is underrepresented on the Security Council's roster of permanent members, and this should be rectified.

Speaking to reporters on Friday (India time) about his priorities for the year, he pressed for reforming the Council because "the centrality of the peace and security system lies in the UN and within" it.

While as the secretary-general he could not say what the reformed Council should be, his personal opinion, he said, is "that we should have permanent members from Africa in the Security Council, the same representation of Latin America".

"I think that probably Asia is underrepresented, also clearly, and so this rebalancing needs to be done", he said.

India, which has staked a claim to permanent membership, has proposed reform along those lines, and this has broad support among UN members.

Guterres took a swipe at those who are blocking the reform process.

"It's very interesting to see that those who criticise the UN for not being effective are the ones opposing the reform of the Security Council," he said.

"That is the reason why the UN can sometimes not be as effective as we all want," he added.

He did not name those opposing the reforms.

A small group of countries that call themselves Uniting for Consensus, led by Italy and including Pakistan, has been holding up the reform process for more than a decade by opposing the adoption of a negotiating text.

Without such a text laying out the agenda and tracking the progress on issues, the negotiations have virtually stalled.

Guterres said he was also supportive of the idea of putting restrictions on the veto rights of permanent members, which have been a major obstacle to the Council acting on several burning issues.

"I see with a lot of sympathy some initiatives that were presented, namely by two permanent members of the Council, in order to put some limits to the exercise of the right of veto", he said, referring to the proposals by France and Britain.

Under their proposal, vetoes would be restricted "in circumstances of genocide or terrible crimes against humanity", he said.

"These would be the lines of evolution I would like to see the international community come together in order to have a reformed Security Council," he said.

He was asked about the Board of Peace set up by President Donald Trump in Gaza and the development of the war-ravaged territory with the approval of the Council, but which he now wants to assume a broader role that some see as rivalling the UN.

"The Security Council stands alone in its Charter-mandated authority (is able) to act on behalf of all members in questions of peace and security," Guterres said.

"Only the Security Council can adopt decisions binding on all, and no other body or ad hoc coalition can legally require all Member States to comply with decisions on peace and security," he said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an observer, Guterres makes a valid point. The current structure reflects a post-WWII world order. The 21st century needs a council that represents current global realities. Reforming the veto is also crucial to prevent paralysis on critical issues.
P
Priya S
It's high time! We've been talking about UNSC reform for decades. The "Uniting for Consensus" group, led by Italy and including Pakistan, is blocking progress for their own narrow interests. The world can't wait forever. India deserves a seat at the table.
R
Rohit P
While I agree with the need for reform, let's be realistic. The permanent five won't give up power easily. Adding new members might just create more deadlock unless the veto power is seriously curtailed, as France and Britain have suggested. Tough road ahead.
K
Kavya N
Guterres is spot on about those who criticize the UN but block reform. It's hypocrisy. For India, this is a matter of principle and justice. We are a responsible nuclear power, a major contributor to UN peacekeeping, and the world's largest democracy. Our place is long overdue.
M
Michael C
A more representative Security Council could lead to more legitimate and effective global decisions. However, the process needs to be careful. Expansion should not come at the cost of efficiency. The proposal to limit veto in cases of atrocities is a good first step.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50