Maharashtra EC Warns Against Ink Erasure, Re-Voting in Civic Polls

The Maharashtra State Election Commission has issued a stern warning that attempting to erase the indelible ink from a voter's finger to vote again is a punishable electoral malpractice. It clarified that even if the ink is removed, the poll body's records prevent the individual from casting a second vote. The commission reiterated standing orders from 2011 on properly applying ink with marker pens to ensure visibility. This statement follows allegations by Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray that the ink was being easily removed with substances like sanitiser during ongoing local body polls.

Key Points: Maharashtra EC: Erasing Voting Ink Doesn't Allow Re-Voting

  • Legal action for ink erasure
  • SEC maintains voter record
  • Marker pen use mandated since 2011
  • Allegations by Uddhav Thackeray
  • Polls across 29 corporations
3 min read

Anyone erasing ink does not allow re-voting: Maharashtra EC

Maharashtra State Election Commission clarifies that erasing indelible ink is malpractice; legal action will be taken. A record prevents re-voting.

"Even if someone attempts to commit a malpractice... the concerned voter cannot vote again. - State Election Commission"

Mumbai, January 15

Amid allegations of electoral malpractice in the Maharashtra local body polls, the Maharashtra State Election Commission has clarified that attempting to erase the ink applied on a voter's finger and thereby trying to create confusion among voters is a malpractice.

"If it is found that a person has erased the ink from their finger and has come to vote again, appropriate legal action will be taken against them," the State Election Commission has informed in an official statement.

The SEC has also emphasised that even after one erases the indelible ink, it does not mean they can vote again, as the poll body maintains a record of who has cast their vote.

"Even if someone attempts to commit a malpractice by erasing the ink on the finger, the concerned voter cannot vote again. Necessary safeguards in this regard have already been put in place. Once a voter has cast their vote, a record of it is maintained. Therefore, merely erasing the ink does not enable a voter who has committed such malpractice to vote again," the statement read.

The SEC has also issued instructions to all concerned authorities to remain vigilant in this matter have once again been issued.

According to the official statement, the SEC had issued orders on November 19, 2011 and November 28, 2011 regarding the use of marker pens for applying ink on voters' fingers. Since then, marker pens have been used in local self-government elections to mark voters' fingers.

"As per these orders, the ink should be applied with a marker pen in such a way that it is clearly visible on the voter's finger. The ink should be rubbed three to four times on the nail and on the skin above the nail. These instructions have been issued earlier and are also printed on the marker pens themselves," the statement read.

The State Election Commission has therefore appealed to voters not to attempt the malpractice of erasing the ink.

The SEC's clarification comes after Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray raised allegations of electoral malpractice happening in the ongoing local body polls across 29 municipal corporations in Maharashtra.

Thackeray alleged that the indelible ink, which is put on the fingers of electors after voting, is being easily removed with nail polish remover and sanitisers, allowing certain people to seemingly vote more than once.

"Has a sanitiser agency hired by Election Commission? I think action should be taken against the Election Commissioner. What have they done in the last nine years? The Election Commission is a servant, not a king. I urge you to come out in large numbers and vote," he said.

Polling for BMC and 28 other municipal corporations commenced on Thursday morning at 7.30 am, and will continue till 5.30 pm, with vote counting scheduled to begin on Friday, January 16.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
But if Uddhav Thackeray is raising concerns, there must be some truth to it? Why would the ink come off so easily with sanitiser? The EC needs to ensure the ink quality is top-notch. We can't have any doubt about election integrity.
A
Aman W
This is a serious issue. In a democracy, one person, one vote is the foundation. Strict action should be taken against anyone trying to cheat. The vigilance instructions to authorities are a good step.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the technical details about how the ink should be applied. Rubbing 3-4 times on the nail and skin seems thorough. Hopefully, the polling staff is following these instructions correctly at every booth.
V
Vikram M
The real problem is the lack of trust. When political leaders make such allegations, it creates confusion among common voters like us. The EC's appeal is fine, but they need to be more transparent about the safeguards.
K
Kavya N
Instead of just issuing statements, the Election Commission should do random checks at polling stations. See if the ink is really indelible. Action speaks louder than words. Let's protect our vote!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50