Angel One Q3 Profit Dips 4% to Rs 269 Cr, Declares Dividend & Stock Split

Angel One reported a 4% year-on-year decline in consolidated net profit to Rs 269 crore for the third quarter of FY26. The company's board approved an interim dividend of Rs 23 per share and a stock split in the ratio of 1:10. Despite the annual dip, the brokerage showed strong sequential growth with profit after tax rising 26.9% quarter-on-quarter. Key segments like broking, wealth management, and credit disbursals all registered significant growth during the quarter.

Key Points: Angel One Q3 Profit at Rs 269 Cr, Announces Dividend & Stock Split

  • 4% YoY profit dip to Rs 269 cr
  • Revenue up 5.8% YoY to Rs 1,334.8 cr
  • Board approves Rs 23/share dividend & 1:10 stock split
  • Strong QoQ growth with PAT up 26.9%
2 min read

Angel One's Q3 profit falls 4 pc to Rs 269 crore

Angel One's Q3 FY26 net profit fell 4% YoY to Rs 269 crore, while revenue grew. Board approves interim dividend and 1:10 stock split.

"Consolidated profit after tax rose 26.9 per cent quarter-on-quarter - Company Filing"

Mumbai, Jan 15

Stock broking firm Angel One Limited on Thursday reported a 4 per cent year-on-year decline in its consolidated net profit to Rs 269 crore for the third quarter.

Along with the results, the company's board approved an interim dividend of Rs 23 per share and a stock split in the ratio of 1:10, according to its stock exchange filing.

The company's revenue for the quarter rose 5.8 per cent year-on-year to Rs 1,334.8 crore, compared with Rs 1,262.2 crore in the same period last financial year.

EBITDA increased 6.7 per cent to Rs 529.1 crore from Rs 495.9 crore, while the EBITDA margin improved slightly to 39.6 per cent from 39.3 per cent a year ago.

On a quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) basis, Angel One showed strong growth. Consolidated gross revenue rose 11.1 per cent to Rs 1,337.7 crore in Q3 FY26 from Rs 1,204.2 crore in Q2 FY26.

Consolidated EBDAT increased 24.8 per cent to Rs 405 crore, with the margin improving to 39.4 per cent from 34.5 per cent in the previous quarter.

EBDAT from the broking and distribution businesses, including mutual funds and credit, grew 25.3 per cent quarter-on-quarter to Rs 433.6 crore.

The margin in this segment improved to 43 per cent from 37.7 per cent in Q2FY26.

Consolidated profit after tax rose 26.9 per cent quarter-on-quarter to Rs 268.7 crore, while profit from broking and distribution businesses increased 27.4 per cent to Rs 301 crore.

In the broking segment, the client funding book grew to Rs 5,860 crore as of December 2025 -- registering a 10.4 per cent growth over the previous quarter.

In non-broking businesses, the number of unique SIPs reached 23 lakh during the quarter, while credit disbursals jumped 55.7 per cent quarter-on-quarter to Rs 710 crore.

The company's wealth management business also performed well, with assets under management rising 33.7 per cent quarter-on-quarter to Rs 8,220 crore.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the diversification paying off. Non-broking segments like SIPs and credit are growing fast. AUM in wealth management crossing ₹8,200 crore is impressive. Shows they're not just a brokerage anymore.
V
Vikram M
As a long-term shareholder, I'm happy with the 1:10 stock split. It will improve liquidity and make the stock more accessible. The interim dividend is the cherry on top. Hope they maintain this momentum.
R
Rohit P
Credit disbursals up 55.7% QoQ is huge! But I hope they are being responsible with their lending. We've seen other fintechs get into trouble with aggressive credit growth. Otherwise, solid numbers overall.
P
Priya S
The improvement in EBITDA margin is the key takeaway for me. Efficiency is improving even as they scale. 23 lakh unique SIPs also shows they are successfully onboarding new investors into systematic investing. Good for the market.
M
Michael C
Respectfully, while the QoQ numbers look good, we must acknowledge the 4% YoY profit decline. It suggests last year's same quarter was exceptionally strong or there are rising costs. Investors should look at both comparisons, not just the positive one.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50