Andrew Garfield defends his 'controversial' decision watching 'Harry Potter' movies
Los Angeles, March 27
Hollywood actor Andrew Garfield has revealed that he only recently just watched the 'Harry Potter' movie franchise. The actor said that he's aware it is a controversial decision given author J.K. Rowling's anti-trans views.
The Oscar nominee wouldn't even say her name, referring to Rowling instead as "she who shall remain nameless" in an apparent nod to the villainous Voldemort, reports 'Variety'.
The actor also noted that Daniel Radcliffe's performance is so great and the artistry on display so beautiful that one can't just outright dismiss the films because of Rowling.
He said, "Daniel is so goddamn good. Honestly, I hadn't watched the 'Harry Potter' movies until recently. He's really good in those movies. Those 'Harry Potter' movies are really good. I know it's controversial and we shouldn't be putting money in the pocket of inhumane legislation right now through she that shall remain nameless, but the soul and spirit. The essence of the themes of those films and the kids and the artisans and the craft people".
He further mentioned, "I'm working with a wonderful makeup artist, Claire, who worked on the creature, you can't throw the baby out of the bathwater. There are so many beautiful artists that worked on those films. I have a newfound appreciation for all of the artists, and Daniel is great".
As per 'Variety', 'Harry Potter' is currently being rebooted as an HBO television series, the first trailer for which debuted online this month to much fanfare.
Several of the actors in the show have been questioned about joining the franchise despite its creator's anti-trans views. Dumbledore actor John Lithgow told The New York Times he nearly quit due to the backlash he received over being associated with Rowling.
He stayed on because the 'Harry Potter' books themselves were "clearly on the side of the angels, against intolerance and bigotry", something Garfield noted when he spoke of "the essence" of the franchise's themes.
— IANS
Reader Comments
Honestly, I think he's overthinking it. Just watch the movie if you want to. We watch so many things made by problematic people. The story itself is about love and friendship, which are universal values.
Respect for Daniel Radcliffe's acting is one thing, but calling it a "controversial decision" to watch a movie feels very first-world problem to me. We have bigger issues to worry about.
As someone who grew up with Harry Potter, this debate is sad. The books taught me about bravery and standing up for others. It's painful that the author's views now clash with those very lessons. Andrew's nuanced take is appreciated.
The "she who shall remain nameless" bit is clever, I'll give him that. But the core issue remains - by engaging with the franchise, you're still supporting her platform and bank account indirectly. It's not a clean separation.
I think we can enjoy the art while condemning the artist's personal views. Many great works in history were created by flawed people. The message of the story is what matters most. 🪄
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.